Sad News

I don't think I'll be attempting to comment at Dan's blog anymore...except to post snark.  There's no point in trying to engage in legitimate, honest discourse where a major coward can't assure one one's comments and responses won't be deleted on the weakest of reasons.  You'll note that even with multiple demands on my part that Dan refrain from proceeding on tangents and such, as well as repeated requests that his fake Christian ass cease references to God/Christ as if he actually believes in Him, I've not deleted any of his bullshit comments.  I've been pretty clear I'm not into that fascistic cancellation of opposing thoughts, views and opinions, even when they're as stupid, non-factual and immoral as that so common to the likes of Dan.  

In his latest puke-fest, I attempted to respond to his lying about conservative objections to Biden's student loan redistribution, as well as his corruption of Scripture intended to legitimize it.  He hasn't the integrity, maturity or manhood to meet my comments head-on, but instead deletes them as always because he has no legit argument.  

As to Biden's student loan criminality, "forgiveness" can only come from the aggrieved.  I can't forgive someone for an act not perpetrated against me, but against another.  If someone slaps me, I can forgive them.  If someone slaps my friend, it's up to my friend to forgive.  If someone owes me money, I can forgive the debt and take on the hardship of the lost amount out of my own sense of Christian charity.  But if someone owes my friend money, I can't tell the person who owes that he no longer owes and force the hardship of the lost amount on my friend.  It's not my debt to forgive.  Biden didn't lend this money.  The Department of Education...or whatever federal department facilitated the loan of our tax dollars...didn't lend this money.  That money belongs to the people...ALWAYS...not the federal (or state or local) government.  It's bad enough the feds chose to loan out our money.  It's far worse they chose to tell the welchers they don't have to pay us back.  There's no Scripture...despite Dan's listing of verses and passages that have no application to this situation...which supports a government forcing it citizens to pay off the loans of others.  None, and Dan's a liar for daring to corrupt Scripture to appear to do so.  His understanding of Jubilee is false and his use of verses dealing with forgiveness don't at all apply.

In the following article,

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/student_loan_transferral_ought_to_be_the_nail_in_the_coffin_for_democrats.html

...the author asks this question:

"Why should you pay for this agenda if you are among the following people?

• People who never went to college 

• People whose tuition was paid by the Armed Forces for service to our country

• People who worked their way through college and did not incur debt

• People who have already paid off their college debt

• People whose parents were willing and able to pay for their college, perhaps because they chose inexpensive community colleges for their freshman and sophomore years, and in-state universities for their junior and senior years, over pricey private schools

• People who placed out of a semester or even a year of college through high school advanced placement courses

• People who finished their degrees in four years

• People who earned degrees in fields such as nursing, engineering, and physical sciences that pay sufficiently high starting salaries to justify any debt they incurred "

  
  

  
  

  Dan has no real answer, but only perverse bastardizations of the Scripture of which he has no legitimate understanding.

  
  

  UPDATE:  I would be remiss if I didn't clarify one point...Dan did not delete the last comment I posted when I decided to do this post.  The threat, however, was stated for subsequent comments.  Not a whole lot of difference, but I don't want to be accused over such a trivial misstatement. 
  

Important Action Taken

I don't like to delete people.  I prefer to let morons hang themselves with their own stupidity.  Unfortunately, every once in awhile, someone's comments are beyond the pale in some form or fashion.  feo has been banished for his many egregious actions.   Indeed, employing comment moderation was the result of such bad behavior.  Dan's always on the cusp.

Now we have "anonymous", who was nice enough to attempt to post a comment under the moniker "Master Troll" as I requested.  Unfortunately, he chose to make his first comment under that name one I will not post.  It's more of the same willful lies about a willful liar, and intentionally lying about a known liar is no better than the behaviors of the known liar.  Worse, it's done just to troll.  

Well, such comments will not see the light of day here.  I don't much care how the Troll's comments would make Danny wet his panties, but for him to play victim would be too much.  Thus, the Troll's comments are worse than standard trolling would be given who would pout and make demands as if I give a shit about his feelings.  Again.  That's just too much.  

So, sorry Master Troll.  Unless you have something honest and compelling to say, your visits here will be wasted.  As it stands, I've marked you for spam, so I don't know if I'll even see any further comments from you,anyway.  I hope you find the bed you've made for yourself comfortable. 

Visions Of Loveliness

 It's natural for the average human being to gravitate towards what's perceived as beautiful.  One wants to drink in the vision of it, to reach out and touch it or to embrace it.  Given the object of attention, to at least preserve the opportunity to be near it as often as possible.  Such things appeal on an emotional level.  They provoke a visceral response stirring something within and compelling a sense of pleasure while in its presence to the extent one wishes never to leave it.  It can touch some on a spiritual level, as indeed, the beautiful seems heaven-sent.  A gift from the Almighty.  

A sunset, a rainbow, a purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain.  A painting or sculpture of the great masters.  A tune, a flower, a meadow.  A newborn, a flock of birds in flight.

A hot babe.   Oh yes.  A beautiful female. 

Womankind is a gift of God to men.  The female form was intended to appeal to men, and the best of them do sometimes far more than any woman would like.  But every normal man gets it.  Every normal man is enamored of a beautiful woman.  No normal man would pretend they are not taken by the sight of a beautiful woman.  Moved by it.  <i>Aroused</i> by it.  It's automatic.  An involuntary response.  It's as it is meant to be.

It's as it is meant to be.  It would make no sense that God would provide a "helpmate" which man would find repulsive or even easy to disregard.  It would make no sense to then say, "Go forth and multiply" only to have man respond, "Aw, gee, do I have to?"  No.  Man says, "May I obey all your commands with equal pleasure, Sire!" and he does so because he is attracted to the beauty of the female. 

Somehow, this reality is foreign to a particular prog from Kentucky.  It's considered by him to be perversion.  To that end, he cites Donald Trump as a peculiar example.  I recall Trump saying something to the effect that when he sees a beautiful woman, he has to kiss her.  He can't help himself.  Well, here's the actual video showing more than what has commonly been presented:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-hot-mic-when-you-re-star-you-can-do-n662116

So here we see the Donald (or rather, hear the Donald) speaking to others in a situation so incredibly common to men, where they speak in a ribald manner as normal guys are wont to do (note: this is not to say it's what good Christian men do, but even good Christian men do it more often than they ought---it's just a fact).  You'll hear him say what liars like to pervert to mean he actually grabs women by the crotch without their consent.  But what to do we actually see?  They see a woman approaching, make "lecherous" comments about her, but when he steps off the bus and greets her, what does he do?  He shakes her hand!  It's not until Billy Bush encourages here to give Trump a hug does Trump touch her more than that and a hug is ALL which happens!  

Ah, but that's just one incident which Dan can no longer exploit but will nonetheless having seen the video yet again, but with more detail which shows Trump acting in a more gentlemanly manner to Dan's great chagrin.  What's more, it Bush who is acting poorly and without him there, it appears Trump would not have done a damned thing a "grace embracing" fake would hope to see. 

Is Trump fond of hot babes?  He'd be perverse if he wasn't.  So would 99% of the male population.  Does he like to be around them?  He'd be perverse if he didn't.  So would 99% of the male population.  You know what would be perverse?  If Trump had the hots for Billy Bush.  

I was at the beach today.  I ogled, leered and possibly drooled.  At the same time, my wife was enjoying the sight of handsome males.  According to Dan, we're a couple of pervs.

May I obey all your commands
with equal pleasure, sire!

Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood

May I obey all your commands
with equal pleasure, sire!

Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood

May I obey all your commands
with equal pleasure, sire!

Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood

Things Too Many Don't & Won't Consider

 In the last comment thread, Craig and I got into it again about Trump.  I have no problem with such debate, as it's actually necessary given the state of the nation.  But as luck often has it, I came upon something that relates to that discussion in a very direct way.  I present it here in two ways:

First, by virtue of what led to me to the more detailed speech on the subject, which is a synopsis from the perspective of one who was not (and might still not be) a great fan of Trump:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/07/i_was_wrong_about_trump.html

The author admits he focused too much on Trump's particular manner and personality and I'm convinced far too many who should know better do so as well.  Indeed, I can say the same of myself with regard to how I thought of him prior to the 2016 general election, when I was totally opposed to a guy like him serving as president of these United States of America.  

Then came his four years and what follows is the type of objective regard of Trump which those four years must compel of any voter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-GAw1lLWJA

I acknowledge it won't be enough for some.  Certainly the stupid of the left will never see things in such a way, but as with the last post, I speak not to them with this post, but to those who are more often than not like minded. 

Here I must reiterate once more that I am not so much married to Trump, despite his good work as president, but married to the worry there exists no one capable in the manner he has shown himself to be at a time when we absolutely need someone as determined and able to do what must be done for the good of the country.  Only DeSantis has shown himself to be such a person, and he's not running. 

I sincerely and fervently hope that whomever wins the GOP nomination in '24 will know better than to give back ground this guy gained for us all.  Too much is at stake and as bad off as we now are for having rejected him in 2020, we can easily be far worse off by the time that election rolls around. 

Who If Not Him?

 I'm very much interested in legit arguments for an option for president in '24 if Trump is not among them.  Thus, I offer this post as a forum for those leaning to starboard to provide suggestions for who they'd like to see run at that time, and why.  I don't think DeSantis will run, and he could really prove himself worthy of mass support if he serves another term as Florida governor first.  And while I think he could step in immediately and be effective in the same way he's been effective in Florida, he's also setting an example of what a good governor should look like and another term would go a long way toward really cementing that in the minds of people of other states. 

So if not Trump, then who?  I still like Ted Cruz.  I like Mike Pompeo, though I need to study his record more deeply.   Tom Cotton's another possibility.  Who do you think would be good and why?

As I said, this post is meant for those who lean conservative, but I'm always up for a good laugh, so if lefties can't help themselves, it would be fun to see which moron they'd support.

Our Butthead In Chief: Part The Third---Too Huge A Task

 Since that fateful day when we learned the 2020 election was stolen from the best president we've had in decades, I've hoped to have a running series of posts dealing with the consequence of so many having rejected Donald Trump back then.  That "consequence" is none other than Joe Biden: Destroyer.  In my "discussions" on social media, evidence is plentiful of those most moronic of TDS sufferers that actually believe we are still somehow better off by having denied Trump a second term.  It amazes me anyone could ever so much as hint as such a thing, even jokingly.   There's no way to describe just how stupid that position is, and by "stupid", I mean that in the most unambiguous and direct manner possible, with all the hurt feelings which it should provoke.  Those who rejected Trump are deserving of scorn and derision at the very least for the harm which has befallen the nation since that dark day.

But there's a struggle to decide just how to proceed with the plan here.  Every time I feel like I have an idea of just what Biden blunder should be the subject of a post, more serious blunders take place or are revealed.  It makes one's head spin to consider all the ways he's caused harm and all the nuances within each of those ways which have manifested or will manifest.  There's just so much.  From the arming of the Taliban with weapons far more destructive than what he wants to take from us, to the arming of the Ukranians with weapons far more destructive than what he wants to take from us, to the tax dollars each of just those two questionable acts cost us.   The running up of the debt to the running up of the price of just about every damned thing the average American would want or need to buy.

And then there's his lying.  This guy lies in a way only a Louisville moron would pretend Donald Trump lied, but for real and in ways far more damaging.  For example, a routine lie of Biden's is the "Putin Price Hike" or the "Putin Gas Price Hike".  This buffoon creates an inflationary nightmare and blames it boldly on Putin...which leads to another lie, which is that Putin is the great evil of our time, while between Biden and Xi Jinping, Vlady only comes in third at best.  And between Biden and Xi, I have to give the prize to Stutterin' Joe because his stupidity (gosh, I hope it's stupidity!) has greased the skids for everything Xi, and for that matter Putin, hope to do.

So I'm beginning to believe it's enough to state the obvious and leave it at that.  That opens me up to lame criticisms, but absolutely won't lead to any evidence that Biden's elevation to the Big Chair was in any way intelligent or pleasing to God.  The harm we all now suffer is due to that moronic rejection of Trump.  That's not even debatable, and it has manifested in so many ways I'm now left with this inability to choose just how to go about commenting.  I'm sure to leave out so much as there is so much wrong.  We'll see how this plays out.  I just needed to express my frustration.

If Dan Says "Stay Away", Part 3

Continuing on with the moronic, we now come to the what is possibly the worst of it:

"There simply is no corresponding set of "liberal conspiracy theories" that are as common and widespread and widely taken seriously."  

This is as astoundingly false as anything Dan has ever said...and that's truly saying something.  

"In fact, I did a search and just couldn't find anything serious."  

Really.  Where did he search?  His socks and underwear drawer?  But here's the thing:  Dan once again is dictating what counts as "common, widespread or serious".  How convenient.  What this means is that he can once again insist what he regards as "right wing conspiracy theories" as "common, widespread or serious", while describing left wing conspiracies as UNcommon, NOT widespread and UNserious.  This is typical Dan-style lying.  Well, I've shown where those conspiracies he listed were far from widely believed or taken seriously by the average conservative and which weren't even properly presented, but purposely contorted to disparage conservatives and which weren't even "theories" at all, but beliefs based on facts, evidence and reality.  Those like Dan dismisses them in the manner described above.  

But as to a lack of any leftist parallels...well, that suggests what he said about "right wing conspiracy theories" was true in the first place.  IF they are, then there are indeed parallels to the extent the left believes all manner of crap as if proven.  But the truth is, they go way beyond what he wants to believe is true of conservatives.  His first lie is what begins this post, followed by his doubling down that he couldn't find any leftist parallels.  Maybe he should have tried searching the internet.  That's what I did, and you'll see what I've found.

https://i2i.org/left-wing-conspiracy-theories/

https://insidesources.com/tag/liberal-conspiracy-theories/

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/21/speaking-qanon-conspiracies-check-out-these-gems-l/

This next one argues that "conspiracy theories" are no less common among the left-wing as the moral.

https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2020/07/23/how_the_left_fools_themselves_into_thinking_the_right_are_conspiracy_theorists.html

...as does this one, and it also affirms such behavior is not on the rise.

https://www.niskanencenter.org/conspiracy-beliefs-are-not-increasing-or-exclusive-to-the-right/

Now, I didn't do more than a cursory read of these and other links I chose against posting, but the Russian Collusion Hoax is an obvious one which might be among the links above.  Also, the lefty morons like Dan still like to believe Trump is racist, with their very own Joey "Which One Is My Wife" Biden still repeating the "good nazis in Charlottesville" lie.  How many lefties still believe Trump urinated on a bed in Russia because Obama slept in it?  How many believe he grabs women by the crotch, like Dan and some of his leftist "enemy of the people" news sources still do?  Then of course there's the conspiracy that there are more than two genders, that abortion doesn't kill a person, that Border Control Agents on horses whipped innocent Haitians. 

If a "conspiracy theory" is a falsehood one needs to prove and support with evidence and data in order for a conservative to be taken seriously, there is far, far more bullshit the lefties...especially those like Dan...spew as truth.  Hell...just read Dan's blog for a few days, and you'll have your fill of falsehoods.  

Indeed, I haven't scratched the surface of all the nonsense the left puts forth.  We're watching an example of leftist conspiracy theory with the kangaroo court Jan 6 hearings.  Lies are essential for the left, for the Democrat Party, for "progressive" "Christians" and they present them as truth in a far more "this is gospel truth" manner than the wildest conspiracy theorist of the type Dan means when he use the term so pejoratively.  

Dan encourages us:  "Don't lie down with pigs in their stupidly false claim pit."

We don't.  We don't lie with leftists/Democrats/socialists/"progressives" and fake Christians like Dan.

Danny Deception finishes with three links...two of which are far more critically biased to the left than the first of them, and all of which I read when I first saw his drivel posted.  Frankly, I'll need to re-read them in order to comment on them at this point.  I really don't want to put myself through it again, though I likely will, at which point I'll address the crapola therein.  Stay tuned (but don't hold your breath).