I'm All For It

 In one of Craig's recent posts, Dan felt compelled to weigh in with his usual vile hatred for our president.  The issue was the Trump administration's targeting of narco-terrorists from Venezuela running drugs toward our shores.  Our people would blow up their boats in international waters.  Dan was apparently fine with Biden's open border policies which allowed all manner of scumbag to bring their fentanyl and other drugs across our borders for distribution to stupid people as well as the unsuspecting.  It's said 100K died every year from such poisoning, and Dan had nothing much to say in protest.  If Trump opened the borders, instead of protecting his people as is his sworn duty, Dan would be seeking his impeachment and/or imprisonment because...you know...Must Hate Trump.  And Dan does indeed. 

There's absolutely no policy of Trump's which is above scrutiny.  It is fair, reasonable and frankly, the duty of every American to pay attention as closely as possible to discern what he's attempting to do and if it's a good thing or a bad thing.  

Trump has designated several radical and/or blatantly criminal organizations as terrorists.  With regard to assholes like Tren de Aragua, he has designated them as narco-terrorists who have availed themselves of Biden's stupidity and made for themselves a presence in this country.  Trump...being a regular guy who actually loves his country...wasn't cool with that.  Trump...being an actual man who doesn't like to mess around when serious shit hits the fan...chooses to do something about it.  Trump...being an actual man who doesn't bullshit about the seriousness of a problem and what must be done to resolve it...has chosen to go on the offensive against these most offensive people.  

Dan doesn't like that.  Oh...it's not because Dan cares about who might get 86'd.  Oh no!  It's because...you know...Must Hate Trump and anything and everything he does must be opposed because Dan, knowing nothing but Must Hate Trump, presumes he can criticize the best president we've had since Ronald Reagan...another great president Dan hated.  

Anyway, Dan demands people of intelligence join morons like him in pretending Trump is committing war crimes and such.  It takes a modern progressive asshat to suggest protecting the people of our nation against drug cartels and their deadly products is akin to war crimes, if an asshat is what you want, then Dan is definitely your huckleberry.  He's world class and card-carrying!

So Dan pretends the Trump gang has no way to know if those they've bombed out of the water are actually scumbags and by golly, the US Constitution requires the president to run on over to Dan's place and clear it with him, just as God Almighty needs to check with Dan about abominable sexual behaviors.  Thus, I did some checking and in seconds I came up with the following hard core, far right extremist conservative site (?) which lists the many ways our people can identify narco-terrorists Dan is so keen to defend against the evil Donald J. Trump:

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/detecting-drug-boats-9a18ba

Do these methods, tactics and tools ensure 100% certainty?  Probably not.  But I'd wager the probability of that lofty goal is far, far higher than a putz like Dan has the honor and integrity to concede.  These aren't Jeff St chuckle-heads running this administration, nor are they Biden or Obama administration buffoons, either.  They're actual America loving patriots who, while not being perfect, shouldn't be insulted by being mentioned in the same sentence with any of the aforementioned.  None of the other are or were serious players.  They're all posers and posturing frauds not worthy of recognition. 

Good people disagree with this policy.  Dan's not among them.  I applaud it and more than that, I support taking it to the assholes in ways that have true impact on their future intentions, if not their futures altogether.  When dealing with gangs like TDA and Hamas and a few others, nothing says "We're serious about solving this problem" like killing them.

Within our borders, we have laws which require proving someone is guilty before killing them, or in cases of killing them on the streets, agonizing process compels confirming no other recourse.  While this works great for those who are actually innocent, it puts law enforcement and the public at great risk and so much more often than not, law enforcement and neighbors are well aware of who the most dangerous assholes are.  The really bad guys murder publicly or leave the bodies out in the open as a warning.  This works in areas where LE is not truly concerned with E-ing the L or protecting the citizenry.  But good people can use a similar strategy to put fear where it belongs...in the black hearts of the evil.  

Trump is notable for understanding the necessity of this practice.  It's no good to say it incites the evil to be more evil because they're already evil.  As it stands, bad actors on the world stage are not keen to drawing Trump's attention by being assholes.  He made that known in his first time in office and he's done so again with the strike on Iran.  His righteous assaults on drug runners from a narco state is another example and it is absolutely necessary.  

The only problem with it is that it is not enough.  Evil must be vanquished for the good of us all.  There's way too much of it in the world and the evil thinks the world is theirs.  

Dan's good with that.  He's good with that so long as Trump ends up in jail.