This is interesting:
https://amgreatness.com/2024/11/02/social-media-influencers-say-they-were-offered-big-bucks-to-promote-harris-on-their-platforms/
Given the biggest crowds Harris could muster included entertainers, where the crowds thinned when the entertainers left for failed to entertain at all, paying for support doesn't seem at all far-fetched.
There's always quid pro quo in politics, and more specifically, in political campaigns. There's the proper kind, which is "I promise to work toward XYZ" and the people who really hope to have XYZ vote for the candidate. Those who really want to be free to kill their babies in utero flock to Harris because Harris promises she'll protect that heinous "freedom" on their behalf. Those who really want to see crime reduced, prices of groceries reduced, illegal invasions reduced flock to Trump because Trump intends to see those reduction happen. Quid pro quo.
But paying people to pretend to like you? That's not cricket. It's lying. It's what the left does. They've always been the most dangerous of liars and they ain't about to change anytime soon. They have no beneficial policy proposals and no track record of beneficial provision. Lying is all they have. That and all the social decay they support.
Decent people who are aware, informed and intelligent don't vote Democrat.
13 comments:
That's no surprise. Any celebrity supporting the Left is likely being paid or blackmailed, or they are just reprobates. Consider how many are part of the Hollywood pedo rings or attendees at Diddy parties. And I bet that a lot of black pastors get paid to bus their congregants to vote, just like Margaret Sanger paid off black pastors to get them to euthanize those that Sanger hated.
When her entire campaign was built on lies, why is this a surprise.
Kamala sits on a throne of lies.
Wait a minute, Craig! I thought Trump was supposed to be the big liar, liar, pants on fire guy!
Trump just doesn't compare to lefties on that score at all.
Neil,
That's a lot of speculation. Sadly, there's solid precedent for it. The history of the Democrat party, for instance, is rife with tales of unethical behavior during campaigns. We're rightly suspicious of dogs with a history of biting people. We're justified in being suspicious of Democrats during election season.
The fact that the Harris campaign paid the celebrities and attempted to pay influencers is pretty well attested at this point.
Craig:
"the 'fact' that Harris paid celebrities is pretty well attested..."
I've done a few searches and can't find ONE news story about this "well-attested" claim.
https://www.google.com/search?q=did+harris+campaign+pay+for+celebrities&sca_esv=041c8bf141f061d1&sxsrf=ADLYWILWyrrA2M8Se-WsH6XPTtKqaIdeMg%3A1731021418095&source=hp&ei=akotZ8KoA5qHw8cPuZaD2Qw&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZy1YepjVUIaUrWBOvTWs9t-nFWOhIWHW&oq=did+harris+campaign+pay+for+cele&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IiBkaWQgaGFycmlzIGNhbXBhaWduIHBheSBmb3IgY2VsZSoCCAAyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABSKU3UABYrSpwAHgAkAEAmAGqAaABzx-qAQQwLjMyuAEDyAEA-AEBmAIdoALRHcICExAuGIAEGMcBGCcYigUYjgUYrwHCAgoQIxiABBgnGIoFwgIEECMYJ8ICChAuGIAEGCcYigXCAhEQLhiABBiRAhjRAxjHARiKBcICCxAAGIAEGJECGIoFwgILEC4YgAQYsQMYgwHCAgUQABiABMICDhAuGIAEGLEDGNEDGMcBwgILEC4YgAQYkQIYigXCAggQABiABBixA8ICERAuGIAEGLEDGNEDGIMBGMcBwgIIEC4YgAQYsQPCAgQQABgDwgIOEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEYigXCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAcICCBAAGIAEGMcDwgIFECEYqwLCAgUQIRifBZgDAJIHBDAuMjmgB-ynAQ&sclient=gws-wiz
Hell, I can't even find a Wing Nut Daily level site saying this.
That you all (Maga-world, in general, including maga defenders like Craig) feel entirely comfortable passing on false claims and unsupported gossip like irresponsible children is part of the problem facing our world and our nation.
But the Russians and others who like to sow mis/disinformation are pretty proud of you all.
Come on, men. Be better than this.
And no, Craig, there were NO riots following Trump's win from the left. Biden and Harris are, of course, handing over the Whitehouse to Trump. There are no serious claims from OUR side that the election was "rigged."
But you all know, somewhere in your souls, that of course, Trump and some portion of MAGA world would have protested and rioted if he lost. HOW do we know this? Because they've already shown us that's what they do.
Look, one perverted sexually predatory, convicted con man like Trump is not a problem for our world. The problem is when he can convince half a nation to support him.
Sadly, that's been lost on you all.
By all means, keep pushing ridiculous false claims and gossip. But no that the Bible says that those who spread rumors, gossip and false claims are not part of the realm of God. IF you're into taking the Bible seriously.
I recently read a story of two podcasters having been offered money to support Harris on their podcasts (they refused), but I can't seem to find the stories at the moment. Hopefully I saved it somewhere. In the meantime, to assert one can't find evidence of this type of thing is absurd:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/harris-and-dems-spent-millions-on-social-media-influence-but-irrelevant-tiktok-users-likely-won-t-vote/ar-AA1thilo
Should I come up with the story I read, I'll certainly post a link to it. Thus, in light of the story I read and this MSN story to which I linked above, the claims are hardly "false" nor "unsupported". Harder to support is the claim by Dan that he actually looks hard for stories which support claims we pass along which he doesn't want to believe are true.
But stories which can't be proven are hardly a significant problem facing us today. No. That would be all which has been claimed and found to be true about the evil of Dan's kind in both government, religion and anywhere else.
"But the Russians and others who like to sow mis/disinformation are pretty proud of you all."
Naw...they're still putting Hillary's "Russian collusion" hoax as the gold standard. Then of course is the multiple gender hoax, the racist police hoax, the insurrection hoax, the climate change hoax, the COVID came from bats hoax, the six-foot rule and masking hoax, the Joe Biden is better for America than Donald Trump hoax, followed by the Kamala Harris is better for America than Donald Trump hoax...and the list goes on for miles. We're already far better than this and more so, we're better than Dan.
"And no, Craig, there were NO riots following Trump's win from the left."
It's early yet, but store owners were preparing for it in many places because there's precedent. To pretend they were fearful of Trump supporters because of a minor disturbance on Jan 6, 2021 is absurd. There's never been such before or since by Trump supporters, Tea Party rally-goers or any other conservative gathering. Note how few shooters there are at gun shows!
But the left? Riots galore!
"Biden and Harris are, of course, handing over the Whitehouse to Trump."
Just as Trump and Pence handed over the Whitehouse to Biden in 2021 in the standard orderly fashion. He didn't even trash the place as Clinton people did in handing the Whitehouse over to GW Bush! No. Despite how badly progressive fake Christian assholes like Dan like to pretend there's some kind of threat from the right, history proves it's the left who can't control themselves.
Here's the link to the article to which I referred above:
https://amgreatness.com/2024/11/02/social-media-influencers-say-they-were-offered-big-bucks-to-promote-harris-on-their-platforms/
And if one wishes to get technical, there is a quid pro quo in every campaign: elect me and I will do this for you. However, there's a marked difference between promising to do what one is Constitutionally mandated to do, without doing what one is Constitutionally prohibited from doing. In the case of both of these candidates, there were promises made which did not reflect that concept. Trump spoke of tax free tips and overtime (I oppose these), which Harris commandeered, having nothing much else at the time to draw people to her. Then, she goes and promises federally funded down payments on first time purchases of homes. So, these are cases where each seems to be buying support.
But it's also helpful to remember that buying votes is another traditional strategy of the Dem Party, just as election fraud is. And Dem voters are more likely to choose on the basis of what candidates can do for them personally ("I'm gonna get some of that Obama money!"). Paying off college debt is just another example of buying support.
So while it may be hard to prove celebs were paid for their support, that's not to say that it didn't happen, and it certainly doesn't say others weren't bribed.
I believe that if a president or senator or congressman does what the Constitution mandates, I will profit in so many ways according to that which the founders believed was important for the nation to thrive and still are.
That you can't find something is hardly conclusive evidence of your claim.
There was an ANTIFA attempt at a riot in Seattle that the Seattle police (strangely) dealt with pretty effectively, and there was apparently a pro-Hamas protest that was "mostly peaceful". You do understand the difference between predicting the likelihood of something happening and some sort of guarantee, don't you. Despite the evidence to the contrary, people like you have been predicting for months that a Trump loss was going to result in a bloodbath. Pointed out the reality that the likelihood of Trump supporters rioting was less than that of Harris supporters rioting. That we only had one quickly controlled riot and one pro-terrorist group protest is hardly the badge of honor you think it is.
There is a likelihood that the Biden/Harris administration will hand over power peacefully, just like Trump did to them, so what?
I made a "prediction", I was wrong. So what?
As Art noted, there are multiple "influencers" who are claiming they were offered money to endorse Harris as well as reports of Harris paying performers for her rallies.
You engaging in more of your "false claims and gossip" mere column inches before your ridiculous charges against us, is simply more of the double standard we've come to expect from you. But I guess admitting that you are not part of the "realm of God" and don't take the Bible "seriously" is something. That you bitch about this sort of minor stuff while ignoring the massive amount of well documented lies perpetrated by the Harris/Walz campaign, and surrogates, and the MSM, is evidence that you don't care much about Truth when it's those on your side.
Dan clinging to the "Russia disinformation" hoax which has been discredited for years, while ignoring a bomb threat by a DFL supporter is prime double standard.
He's clearly ramping up for four years of lying, recycling hoaxes, hatred, and vitriol.
One last thought. If the claims made about Harris paying celebrities turn out to be incorrect, that's what it is. At the time I wrote this, I'd seen no evidence to refute the reports I'd seen. As always, if the evidence changes and new information comes out, I will acknowledge that and move on.
It's just hilarious that after a significant loss by Dan's candidate that all he has is this nit picky bullshit to bitch about.
Craig,
No doubt Dan and his peeps are gearing up to thwart any effort by Trump to do his duty and to continue pursuing all manner of false charges against him. And Dan himself will continue to be obsessed with pu**ies being grabbed. It excites him!
I'm not sure that particular body part excites him at all. With him, all roads lead to one expression of sexual activity.
Post a Comment