I don't think I'll be attempting to comment at Dan's blog anymore...except to post snark. There's no point in trying to engage in legitimate, honest discourse where a major coward can't assure one one's comments and responses won't be deleted on the weakest of reasons. You'll note that even with multiple demands on my part that Dan refrain from proceeding on tangents and such, as well as repeated requests that his fake Christian ass cease references to God/Christ as if he actually believes in Him, I've not deleted any of his bullshit comments. I've been pretty clear I'm not into that fascistic cancellation of opposing thoughts, views and opinions, even when they're as stupid, non-factual and immoral as that so common to the likes of Dan.
In his latest puke-fest, I attempted to respond to his lying about conservative objections to Biden's student loan redistribution, as well as his corruption of Scripture intended to legitimize it. He hasn't the integrity, maturity or manhood to meet my comments head-on, but instead deletes them as always because he has no legit argument.
As to Biden's student loan criminality, "forgiveness" can only come from the aggrieved. I can't forgive someone for an act not perpetrated against me, but against another. If someone slaps me, I can forgive them. If someone slaps my friend, it's up to my friend to forgive. If someone owes me money, I can forgive the debt and take on the hardship of the lost amount out of my own sense of Christian charity. But if someone owes my friend money, I can't tell the person who owes that he no longer owes and force the hardship of the lost amount on my friend. It's not my debt to forgive. Biden didn't lend this money. The Department of Education...or whatever federal department facilitated the loan of our tax dollars...didn't lend this money. That money belongs to the people...ALWAYS...not the federal (or state or local) government. It's bad enough the feds chose to loan out our money. It's far worse they chose to tell the welchers they don't have to pay us back. There's no Scripture...despite Dan's listing of verses and passages that have no application to this situation...which supports a government forcing it citizens to pay off the loans of others. None, and Dan's a liar for daring to corrupt Scripture to appear to do so. His understanding of Jubilee is false and his use of verses dealing with forgiveness don't at all apply.
In the following article,
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/student_loan_transferral_ought_to_be_the_nail_in_the_coffin_for_democrats.html
...the author asks this question:
"Why should you pay for this agenda if you are among the following people?
-
People who never went to college
-
People whose tuition was paid by the Armed Forces for service to our country
-
People who worked their way through college and did not incur debt
-
People who have already paid off their college debt
-
People whose parents were willing and able to pay for their college, perhaps because they chose inexpensive community colleges for their freshman and sophomore years, and in-state universities for their junior and senior years, over pricey private schools
-
People who placed out of a semester or even a year of college through high school advanced placement courses
-
People who finished their degrees in four years
-
People who earned degrees in fields such as nursing, engineering, and physical sciences that pay sufficiently high starting salaries to justify any debt they incurred "
Dan has no real answer, but only perverse bastardizations of the Scripture of which he has no legitimate understanding.
UPDATE: I would be remiss if I didn't clarify one point...Dan did not delete the last comment I posted when I decided to do this post. The threat, however, was stated for subsequent comments. Not a whole lot of difference, but I don't want to be accused over such a trivial misstatement.
