These days when people ask someone, "How was your vacation?" the common response is so often, "Too short."
Well, Parkie's been posting comments again after an absence that has indeed been WAY too short. Naturally, he's been posting the usual pathetic, pitiful and woefully non-clever comments so typical for him and why we must continue to keep him in our prayers, and naturally I've been deleting them. BUT!! THIS comment, posted at the thread below the last was just so incredibly perfect in illustrating how far gone he is that I reprint it here in it's entirety:
""we hate"
Most honest comment of the year from MA..."
Ed Schultz would be proud, nay, envious for just how out of context the quote was and how Parkie used it to imply something completely false, as in, he's a freaking liar.
Maybe he thinks he's being funny. That would be sad and another example of the pathetic, pitiful and non-clever nature of the poor boy (or girl, as the case may be).
In the future, should anyone have the unfortunate experience of actually reading his drivel before I've had a chance to delete it, my advice would be to cut and paste it into your comment and respond that way. I'm gonna continue deleting his worthless drool until he decides to put on his big-boy pants and actually risk by posting a comment of substance that attempts to put seriously his own thoughts (such as they may be) on whatever topic is being discussed. I don't expect he has it in him, so don't hold your breath. The poor little troll.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
68 comments:
The troll commented in his usual manner and I deleted his comments yet again. But part of his last I saved for here:
""imply something completely false"
Hmm.. out of context.. yes..
but.. "false".. going to have say no on that one."
The clinical idiot can say "no" to that all he wants, and he can continue to say that Mark, Neil and I hate homosexuals. But what he can't do is provide evidence of this hatred and he doesn't have the spine or wits to do so. He'd fail if he tried, but his schtick is simply to throw crap against the wall and watch it slide off (since none of it could possibly stick). How completely and utterly pathetic he is.
The troll has been trying to leave this, as well as some other inane comments:
"Evidence?
lol.. ma.. you have have a blog. Try reading it sometime."
First, the ever present and psychotic "lol" affixed to his every comment. But worse, he thinks pointing to my blog is evidence of my hatred and biogtry. But the question is where has hatred and bigotry ever been displayed on my blog by me or my like-minded visitors? He could read every post from its inception a thousand times and never find evidence for that charge. What a pathetic little troll.
Maybe Porkie could man up, grow a pair and actually start his own blog, life would be perfect for him.
As I like Craig, and because he is generally a civil human being, and also because his comments normally contain typos (perhaps he hurries too much and/or doesn't proof read), I'm going to assume the "Porkie" bit was a typo. Yeah, it's a stretch, given the position of "o" and "a" on the keyboard, but like I said, I like Craig and I can't recall him ever making such a crack before.
But it did lead to another stupid comment by the troll-boy:
"Porkie? LOL.. And to think its MA that has trouble getting out the door to do his exercise."
I tell ya...that Parkie laughs at anything! But I don't know what to make of his homo-like fixation on my physique. I don't know what makes him think I would have any trouble getting out the door to do anything? What a queer dude!
Marshall,
Let's call it an intentional typo. After being taken to task by troll boy over a couple of typos over the past months I occasionally drop a typo into comments for or about the troll. I learned the blog etiquette about taking shots at typos early and find that people who do, only do so because they have nothing else.
Sorry if it caused a problem.
My point still regarding parkies cojones still stands though.
Craig,
I can live with that.
Marshall,
I just posted some quotes from a great book at my blog.
If you have a chance check it out.
Oh my...
You two really have major isssues with sexuality. Craig talks about my "cojones" and Ma thinks that having an interest in physical activity makes somebody gay.
Last.. if you're going to delete my comments, then repost them. At least have the courtesy to re-post the entire comment.
Actually I was speaking of the trolls lack of cojones. If he had some he'd stop hiding and write his own blog. Come on, troll up.
thats your comeback?
No it's just an observation.
Since Craig responded, I'll leave the troll's comment up. But I'll respond as well.
"...Ma thinks that having an interest in physical activity makes somebody gay."
Not at all. I think you having a strange interest in my physical shape is "homo-like". Whether you are a homosexual or not, I've not made any such comment. Don't try to make it a matter of physical activity when you clearly and routinely refer to whether or not I'm in shape, as if you have any idea.
"if you're going to delete my comments, then repost them. At least have the courtesy to re-post the entire comment"
"We hate" Sound familiar, troll-boy? Where do you get off demanding how I quote you? Unlike you, there is no mistaking what your comment implies when I post such snippets. And as if that wasn't enough, I do as I please with my own blog. See how that works?
What I don't think troll boy has the ability to comprehend is that is lack of substance is the issue. Oh and the hiding behind the pseudonym and empty blog.
Marshall, how dare you run your blog the way you want, you evil evil man.
(insert tantrum here)
It should also be noted that mis-quoting me only adds more evidence to MA being a complete liar. But, we knew that already. Eh.
"It should also be noted that mis-quoting me only adds more evidence to MA being a complete liar."
Troll makes two major mistakes here:
1) I've never misquoted him at all.
2) Stating that I've done something I haven't done cannot be evidence of wrongdoing on my part, but it certainly shows wrongdoing on his.
Perhaps if he can muster the spine, intelligence and real proof, he might be able to shore up his lame assertion.
I'm sorry. That is a lie. There's no way he can support what isn't true.
Ma.. you deleted my comment. Then.. posted your version of my comment. Such is life. I dont expect you to ever have an honest conversation and I'm not shocked by your actions. Craig, apparently, is and has decided to throw a hissy fit. I suggest the both of you get over it.
It's long been crystal clear that it is beneath me to respond to the troll, considering how much effort he's put into making himself so contemptible, but sometimes I've some free time...
"Ma.. you deleted my comment. Then.. posted your version of my comment."
Negative, foolish little troll. I delete your comments and sometimes re-post those segments of your comments to which I care to respond. They aren't "my version" of your comments, but actual comments of yours that I copy and paste. Don't you even recognize your own pathetic words? Or perhaps you think making such a blatantly false accusation will compel me to allow your comments to remain posted. Silly little troll.
"Such is life."
Clearly not. Such is you lying.
"I dont expect you to ever have an honest conversation..."
There's no way of anyone knowing if you could tell the difference, you never having engaged in actual conversation at this blog. You make drive-by accusations, none of which contain substance, wit, or the least sign that you even know what's going on. You don't support any of them with evidence. You DO, however, play cheap games like posting "We hate" and act as if you've made a case. How childish.
Craig points out how you hide behind a false name with no blog or access to a profile that would give any hint as to who you are. He is correct in assessing this as abject cowardice on your part. I suggest that you continue with that, since to identify yourself can't do any better than to embarrass yourself to anyone who knows you personally, or worse, embarrass them.
No parkie, the problem is that you can't do better than this.
"Ma.. you can do better than that."
Troll-boy said,
"...you really dont get it."
Well, twit. Anytime you wanna risk describing what it is I don't get, why I need to get it and how I might benefit from having gotten it, why you just suit up and bring it. I'm betting you don't even know anything of value anyone should get, or that I don't already have what should be had by all.
To be sure, accusing another of not "getting it", does not prove that you do. In fact, it's generally a pretty clear indication that you never got it, don't get it now, and have no idea of what "it" even is. Saying "you really don't get it" is a way for the clueless to be condescending toward people who get it easily and have had it for along time. It's the perfect line for a troll-boy like yourself.
"Craig points out how you hide behind a false name with no blog or access to a profile that would give any hint as to who you are."
Aww.. you guys really DO care. Its touching that you want to know all about me. :)
Fav. Color: Red, White and Blue.. How could I pick just one!
Fav. President: G. Washington.. aka.. Big Pappi. Close second is Honest Abe. You know, b/c he did it all to free slaves.
And.. my fav. beach to take a long walk on is in Hawaii.
How typical. All we get is another lame comment that only Parkie and his imaginary fans could find clever, and it's uncertain all of them do.
And talk about "not getting it"! We don't really give a flying rat's ass about you and your empty personal life. What we've been striving in vein to acquire is some idea of why you oppose our positions. We know, for example, that you think I'm a racist, a "homophobe" and a hater, yet you've yet to produce any substantive evidence that would even suggest a slight possibility that any of this is true. Craig's suggestion that you actually begin your own blog would give you a forum to express you opposing views and to show why they might be views worth adopting by at least other brain-dead losers like yourself. Do you "get it" now?
""We know, for example, that you think I'm a racist, a "homophobe" and a hater"
Well.. for starters.. I have pointed it out to you. Then, others have pointed it out. If you choose not to get it, its not my problem."
Poor little troll. I can't get what isn't true. YOUR job, had you the spine and intelligence, is to support your allegations with fact. For example, Dan did as much as you, quoting me without the statement that followed, and suggested it was a reason a reasonable black person would deem me racist. No explanation for why that would be so, UNLESS he chose to expose only the truncated portion of my comment. Sort of like, "We hate".
"we've been striving in vein to acquire is some idea of why you oppose our positions"
Umm.. liar. At no time have you made the slightest effort to understand any counter-argument put forth by me or anybody else. Rather, you respond, mostly with, name calling."
No. It is YOU who lies here. First, by offering any substantive response or comment, and secondly, by suggesting that we respond only with name calling. Try again, troll. Try by actually offering a counter ARGUMENT, and not some worthless throw away line that implies much without proving anything.
Correction: you lie by suggesting that you've ever offered any substantive comment or response. You haven't. EVER.
"...first you want to find out all about me, then you dont care?"
You really are a clinical idiot, aren't you, troll? No one has ever said they want to know about YOU. We want to see if you have the brains to really back up your stupid comments and accusations with substance. That would be something akin to an opinion with an explanation for it.
As to editing your comments, you know without question that nothing has been lifted out of context in anything close to the manner of "We hate" and nothing is lost by omitting you incessant "LOL"s, so you've got no legitimate complaint on that score. However, know that if your complaint WAS legitimate, you aren't worthy of consideration. You've worked hard to achieve such a status and I'm not about to mess that up for you. But rather than whine, you should be happy even snippets of your stupidity is being re-posted. If it makes you happier, I'll continue to delete any new attempts to comment. Only a true attempt at honest discussion will be allowed to stand, unless you say something really stupid that compels me to mock you.
My point about the cowardly troll hiding behind anonymity is that it is a it doesn't really take much of anything to hide and throw out stupid comments.
Maybe this whole concept is just too much for trolls.
"No one has ever said they want to know about YOU. We want to see if you have the brains to really back up your stupid comments and accusations with substance."
Here's a deal. First, you back up your "stupid" comments. Or.. just act like an adult and have a regular conversation. You pick.
"Here's a deal. First, you back up your "stupid" comments. Or.. just act like an adult and have a regular conversation."
You don't get to set terms, troll. You prove the charge of stupidity everytime you post a comment here. I have regular conversations with everyone else, even Dan and psuedo-intellectual false priests like feodor. It has always been you who lacks the ability to engage like an adult and have a regular conversation, despite my many and ongoing welcome should you decide to do so. Instead, you consistently choose to be a prick and bore us with your pathetic attempts at clever rejoinders. Spare us or risk exposing the limitations of your intellect as everyone else does.
"I have regular conversations with everyone else"
yes.. I've seen those and how terrible you treat people. Such is life. Get over it MA.. You dont like a different opinion for the simple fact that it is different. In the end nobody cares. Most of the time you end up crying anyway.
If you've truly seen, trol-boy, you know that I treat everyone with respect, even jerks like you, when people are interested in merely debated, conversing and having a discussion. But when jerks like you, or feo, or when anyone else tries to imply something that is plainly false, such as idiocy regarding whether or not I'm a racist, I will treat them badly ONLY if they fail to present evidence to support the charge. You never offer anything but crappy comments and baseless attacks. So it is YOU that needs to get over the fact that I treat you as you insist on being treated.
As I said, even if feodor visited and tried to put forth a point with which I disagreed, I match it with whatever tone he brings along with it. You bring nothing but pathetic attempts at cleverness. Your every post begs for mockery. So it is YOU that needs to "get over it" as WELL as to somehow "get it".
You say nobody cares anyway. Obviously you care or you wouldn't spend so much time here. You'd like to think I end up crying. Dream on, little troll.
"Obviously you care or you wouldn't spend so much time here"
Honestly.. Im amused at how much time you spend responding.
"I'm a racist"
Yes.. you dont want to swing anybody from a rope, but your comments tend to smell a little like an old white guy livin' on the plantation.
"So it is YOU that needs to "get over it" as WELL as to somehow "get it"."
Wait.. hold on now.. Let me get the box of Kleenex.
"I match it with whatever tone he brings along with it."
Let me tell you about this guy called Jesus.
Second, you're comment is completly false. Much of the time you equate a different opinon with giving you the right to call somebody an idiot.
Again, I'm not sure what the point of arguing with you is if your only support is some radical or fear mongering crazy conservative report. Or worse.. an op-ed from Rush Limbaugh.
Just to re-cap, you're the guy that doesnt believe people are animals, cant figure out science, and openly hates gay people. Thats just life MA.. Do something about it or continue the status quo. You just so happen to blog about all these issues. And, I comment on them.
Thanks for proving my point, troll.
"Yes.. you dont want to swing anybody from a rope, but your comments tend to smell a little like an old white guy livin' on the plantation."
Smells like that, huh? In what way? This is what I mean. You spew crap and don't back it up. Whatever you're smelling is emanating from your own self. It ain't coming from here, and you don't have a chance of proving your perception. You see what you want to see, not what is actually written by me.
I'll have to get to the rest later. Try to control you sociopathic desire to make another stupid comment until then.
"?? MA.. put down the hash pipe."
I could do bong after bong, line after line, trip my ass off while drinkin' Jack and STILL take you on, troll-boy. But as it is, I don't do any of that (except for some Jack when I don't have to drive or work the next day).
""It's enough to make one wonder if black people really do need the government to take care of them!"
Case rested."
You've got no case. As Danny T had done, you've copied only part of my words in order to pretend you've proven I'm a racist. Indeed, you've done what you accuse ME of doing, posting less than my entire comment. Go back and read it again, liar, and then have the decency to retract your lie.
"you've copied only part of my words in order to pretend you've proven I'm a racist."
ahh.. yes.. thast it.
"Go back and read it again, liar, and then have the decency to retract your lie."
I thought we decided that you're not a racist unless you want to join the KKK. Simply owning a plantation is not enough. So, yes.. I'm sorry.. you are no longer a racist.
Same thing goes for your views on homosexuality. Since you do not have the desire to round up a posse and hunt down people wearing rainbow colored socks, you are not homophobic.
I feel much better now, dont you?
"That explains why you are losing this argument."
I could be in a coma and STILL not lose a debate or argument against you. Worse, you can have all the world feel the pity I have for you being unable to see your own impotence and that STILL wouldn't get you closer to winning anything.
"btw.. I believe his name is Dan."
You might be right, Parkie. Idiot.
"I feel much better now, dont you?"
I felt just fine as it was, and feel fine now seeing you try to run THAT crap as a legitimate point. Indeed, for all my faults, I feel damn near perfect when I consider that YOU exist in the same world as I do.
"I thought we decided..." Of course by "we" you obviously mean you and your head-lice. No one with a brain would think like you do.
So, butthead. Do you have anything in the way of substantive evidence to support your wild claims about my position on race relations and deviant sexual behavior? Or are you just going to play the same old race card and homophobe card? Sad, pathetic little troll.
wow.. try climbing back on your rocker. Then say something coherent.
wow...climb onto your highchair and then try to indicate where I've shown a lack of coherence. Is there ANY possibility that you could make a comment that is backed up by something substantial, and, if it's not asking too much, honest and truthful? Such a sad and pathetic little troll!
You never cease to amaze.
Yeah. It IS pretty amazing that I continue to hope for something more than the usual from you. Most people would have blocked you years ago. I guess I'm just curious as to just how stupid you really are, and a legitimate comment by you on any topic here or elsewhere would go a long ways toward either confirming or dispelling that notion. It's just too bad you don't have a shred of courage to risk attempting a thoughtful comment and exposing whatever level of depth you possess. I'm guessing it's no deeper than the remaining dampness before the sun has totally dried the pavement after a rain.
But is my patience and unrealized hope more amazing than your total lack of substance? THAT'S a tough call.
Ma.. you can't handle the truth.
Still waiting for you to risk personal embarrassment by stating what you think "the truth" is about anything. I don't believe you even know what truth is or how to recognize it. Take a chance, troll-boy. Try to leave a sensible comment and then we'll talk about handling truth. Got the spine for it? I've no reason to suspect you do.
"risk personal embarrassment"
What are you talking about?
"Got the spine for it?"
You really have lost it.
These are actually reasonable questions, so I'll answer them instead of just deleting them.
When one dares publish one's opinion, or hazards an argument, one risks embarrassment should the opinion/argument prove to be unsound or easily rebutted. All who actually engage, rather than simply throw out drive-by comments, ala Parklike, are showing the backbone of people willing to take that risk. YOU have never displayed such behavior in any of your comments. YOU prefer to be a troll.
"When one dares publish one's opinion"
Do you know where you are?
"backbone"
Perhaps contrary to what you have "learned" in what passed for "science" class during your era, as members of the animal kingdom, and more specifically humans, we all have backbones.
Feel free to research this topic.
"YOU"
While I'm sure you appreciate the opportunity to beat your chest following one of my posts, I fail to see how being a bully and tossing insults helps your cause.
For something completely different, how did you feel about yesterday? Does Troy Davis make you feel like a superior part of the animal kingdom? Or does the murder of two death row inmates yesterday prove that racism has finally been extinguished in this country? Ma.. what does crazy have to say?
"Do you know where you are?"
Yes. Why? Are you having trouble locating your position?
"Feel free to research this topic."
No need. But perhaps you could research "idioms".
"While I'm sure you appreciate the opportunity to beat your chest following one of my posts..."
No. I don't. Otherwise I wouldn't delete the vast majority of them. What I would appreciate is the opportunity to engage in an actual discussion with you, replete with something akin to substance by you. As yet, you have displayed no stomach, backbone, heart, intestinal fortitude for it (these are also idioms).
"...I fail to see how being a bully and tossing insults helps your cause."
Indeed. My cause, as expressed just above, is likely a lost one, as you seem to prefer snark (and bad snark at that) to real opinion. But notable here is your whiney "being a bully and tossing insults" crap. Poor baby.
"Ma.. what does crazy have to say?"
Exactly the question I've been asking ever since you've darkened my blog with your insufferable presence. But instead, you make with the bad snark. So, I'll give you some rope and allow you to change the subject IF you'll provide some elaboration about it. Why do you ask the question in the first place? Perhaps you can start by providing evidence that I've ever stated that racism has been completely extinguished in this country. Maybe you could provide some insights that you have regarding the Davis case. I'm betting you know roughly jack-shit. If you want to know how I feel about two executions, any honest visitor to this blog would not have to ask. But, since you're not one of those, I'll respond to that question ONLY after you come across with the answers to mine.
Your whinning never stops.
"real opinion"
lol.. ma.. priceless.
"Why do you ask the question in the first place?"
Mostly because I'm curious how a fringe right winger sees this issue.
"Your whinning never stops."
Whining? You mean like this:
"...I fail to see how being a bully and tossing insults helps your cause."
Whining is what trolls do when their antics result in their being labeled accordingly.
But what I do is to relate truths, to present facts. If you dispute anything I say, provide an argument supported by evidence of some kind. You haven't ever done anything like that. You prefer to act like a troll.
Real opinion IS priceless. A real opinion from YOU would definitely be priceless as it would be the one and only real opinion you've ever expressed. Indeed, you've never even expressed support for positions opposite mine. Instead you merely mock (or try to mock) what I say without ever offering substance.
"Mostly because I'm curious how a fringe right winger sees this issue."
Then go visit and bother a fringe right-winger, whatever the hell that is. There has been no fringe positions taken here, except where looney lefties attempt to oppose truth.
But I've already indicated that you will get no answers for your questions until you've answered mine. That's the only way any further comments of yours will stand undeleted.
"Hmm.. Feel free to state what your questions are. But im sure you will not like my answers."
Hmm.. You really are an idiot. I'm referring to the questions asked in the last paragraph of my very, very recent comment of September 23, 2011 1:24 AM. And yes, I too am sure I won't like your answers because I don't have any confidence whatsoever that they will be substantive or in any way truly responsive to the questions asked.
Referring to "fringe", you say:
"That’s you! Few (do any?) of your positions fall into something considered the mainstream or conventional. This is evidenced by your lack of citing anything conventional when drawing your conclusions."
Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions? Your statement, such as it is, is merely another example of you assuming what you have made no effort to support. And if there was any doubt in your feeble mind, your word is worthless here and doesn't possess the weight or value necessary to constitute evidence or substance. You'll need to link to some other source for that.
"To borrow one of your tactics.. Are you chicken? Too scared to post a personal opinion. I get it. Thats okay. I wouldnt post if I had that much hate bottled up in me either."
This is pathetic given the thousands of comments I've posted on matters of race relations over the years. More so given the fact that I've just indicated a willingness to explain fully my thoughts on the subject AFTER you come across with some answers. You seem to suffer from this whacked out notion that you can dictate terms here, or goad me with your lame attempt of implying I'm hateful; another accusation you've never been able to support, even a little bit. And as you NEVER post any personal opinion of your own, I guess by YOUR stupid reasoning, it must be because of all that hate you have bottled up inside you.
"And, for heavens sake.. Go for a walk outside!"
There's that homo-like concern for my physical shape again. What's up with that?
once again.. ma.. you go above and beyond.
Feel free to state what your questions are.
Ma:......
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"?"
.. hmm... You have heard of the mainstream? If you have to parse this, you have already lost. Again.
"This is pathetic given the thousands of comments I've posted on matters of race relations over the years."
soo.. you ARE racist...
MA.. I asked about a specific event. You dont want to give a response. Such is life. You keep saying that I should provide you answers. But, feel free to ask a question.
"There's that homo-like concern for my physical shape again. What's up with that?"
and.. homophobic...
In the meantime, I pray that you can respond with dignity and respect.
Here ya go, troll, the questions I asked that were so easy to see by merely looking where I told you to look:
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions?"
" If you have to parse this, you have already lost."
What a cowardly dodge. I know what "mainstream" is. I'm just not sure YOU know what it is. So clarify by answering my questions as they are asked.
"
"This is pathetic given the thousands of comments I've posted on matters of race relations over the years."
soo.. you ARE racist..."
Once again, an accusation without substance or supportive evidence. Find something somewhere in any of my posts that denotes racism and explain why you think it does. That way, I can correct your idiotic conclusion.
""There's that homo-like concern for my physical shape again. What's up with that?"
and.. homophobic..."
Yeah. Sure. Except that there is nothing "homophobic" about pointing out that your concern for my physical shape is very much like a homo's attraction to one of the same gender. The only thing that would make this different is if you said you were a broad.
"In the meantime, I pray that you can respond with dignity and respect."
I don't believe you ever pray or that you know what dignity or respect is.
lol..
"I don't believe you ever pray or that you know what dignity or respect is."
Says the guy responding with "idiot" in nearly evey post.
"homo-like concern"
Ma.. is homophobic because you are trying to turn this conversation into something that is about homosexuality when it never has been, just to make you feel better. You are trying to insult me by turning my suggestion you get more exercise into that of my personal sexual choice. Its sad that this is what you have decided. But again, for somebody that continues to treat others the way you do, its no surprise.
"I know what "mainstream" is."
lol.. ma.. you complain about the MSM. You complain about Obama being elected. You complain that the world doesnt work the way you think it should. You use nutty fringe blogs to support your opinions and listen to conservative talk radio.
oops.. forgot one..
"soo.. you ARE racist"
Yes.. you make racist comments on your blog, as we have been through this many many times.
""I don't believe you ever pray or that you know what dignity or respect is."
Says the guy responding with "idiot" in nearly evey post."
If you insist on acting like an idiot, why would you object?
""homo-like concern"
Ma.. is homophobic because you are trying to turn this conversation into something that is about homosexuality when it never has been, just to make you feel better. You are trying to insult me...etc"
Try to follow along here. You have no legitimate reason to suppose that I need more exercise, having no idea of what my lifestyle consists. Thus, your constant creepy obsession with my physical shape is homo-like in that is like an unnatural attraction. But, as you have no trouble with homosexuality, see it as normal and morally benign, what is your problem here?
As to how I treat others, anyone who is honest can see that I treat others as they want to be treated based on their behavior here. I don't call Dan and idiot (not with any regularity anyway), but only say his comments and opinions are idiotic and then go on to explain why. Even feodor gets better treatment than you until he acts very much like you and makes baseless accusations he refuses to support. YOU are special. YOU just spew crap. You provoke and then complain about the consequences of your provocations. Poor baby idiot.
"You use nutty fringe blogs to support your opinions and listen to conservative talk radio."
Feel free to pick one of those nutty fringe blogs and explain what makes them nutty or fringe. I'll wait without holding my breath.
And yes, I listen to conservative talk radio where one gets a far more in depth analysis of lefty views than anyone on the left gives of the right. Try to rebut THAT one, troll.
""soo.. you ARE racist"
Yes.. you make racist comments on your blog, as we have been through this many many times."
Yet, even with one post on race relations nearby, you've been unable to produce any racist comments, but only comments YOU view as racist without explaining why it is so. Try to be more honest.
Troy Davis.. remember him?
ma.. still you cant come up with a response.
"idiot"
and.. still you dont get it. Im not complaining as much as I'm pointing out how unchristian you are. You cant navigate this world without tossing insults around and trying to bully people. All I am doing is inviting you to be just a little like the man you claim to follow. Obviously you can say whatever you like. But, it is more of a reflection of you.
For example...
"But, as you have no trouble with homosexuality, see it as normal and morally benign, what is your problem here?"
I approach your issue from a health and well-being standpoint. You twist it into something about homosexuality. It is curious that somebody would take a suggestion to go for a hike as "creepy homosexual behavior". But, as we all know, you are homophobic. You are trying to brand me as something you dont like. When you respond this way, you are only speaking to yourself and reflecting on yourself.
This has to be the strangest response to exercise I have ever had.
"Feel free to pick one of those nutty fringe blogs and explain what makes them nutty or fringe."
I will say that it doesnt look like you have much support for any of the opinions you have. Rather the racists and homophobic comments you make are largely from your own brain. However, I believe you have used American Thinker in the past. Michael Medved and Ann Coulter have written for them and they are noted more for the crazy things they say and do than actually providing rational analysis.
"And yes, I listen to conservative talk radio where one gets a far more in depth analysis of lefty views than anyone on the left gives of the right. Try to rebut THAT one, troll."
Really.. both of us know this isnt a defense.
"Troy Davis.. remember him?
ma.. still you cant come up with a response."
Yes I do remember him. Do you remember the questions you've yet to answer? If not, re-read the previous comments. My response is ready and waiting for you to do so.
"and.. still you dont get it. Im not complaining as much as I'm pointing out how unchristian you are."
No. It is you that doesn't get it. I'm not impressed with a non-Christian's chastising a Christian for not acting in a manner the non-Christian expects a Christian to act. The Lord I DO follow actually did the same things I do in calling hypocrits by their name. I call idiots by their name. Don't act like an idiot with every comment you post and I will come to believe you're not the idiot you once appeared to be. And as far as dignity and respect are concerned, you have yet to show any toward me or my conservative guests as I have by virtue of allowing you to continue posting here at all, waiting in vein for that first substance filled comment that shows you are truly interested in dialogue rather than cheap and unfounded accusations. I continue to not hold my breath.
"I approach your issue from a health and well-being standpoint."
Bullshit. You have no reason to suppose my health should be any of your concern. You've got it in your mishapen head that I'm out of shape and have latched onto that as a window of opportunity to make stupid and unclever cracks. And you still don't get that comparing this obsession to a homo-like attraction is not a homosexual remark, any more than describing someone's swiftness as being gazelle-like is bringing up the animal world. It is you that hopes to make this an issue of "homophobia", a charge you also have repeatedly failed to justify. An it is not the suggestion to take a hike that is creepy, as I've suggested that to you myself. It is the obsessive nature of your concern for my physical shape that is creepy.
"I will say that it doesnt look like you have much support for any of the opinions you have."
That you cannot see or understand them doesn't mean they don't exist.
"Rather the racists and homophobic comments you make are largely from your own brain."
No. They are a figment of your wild imagination. I don't make such remarks and you've yet to point any out.
"I believe you have used American Thinker in the past. Michael Medved and Ann Coulter have...etc"
I use AT often. They are a good source for thoughtful conservative opinion, most of whom use a plethora of links to support their opinions. Medved and Coulter have never posted columns there to my knowledge, so you once again show you know nothing. BUT, that libs think them notable for saying crazy things only indicates that libs don't pay attention to the opposition.
"Really.. both of us know this isnt a defense."
It wasn't a defense, but a statement of fact.
Now, go back to those questions and answer one or two of them.
Ma.. obviously we disagree.
I find you to be a lying egomaniac. Worse than all of that, you are rather boring. I really wish one day you would prove me wrong.
It's true that we obviously disagree, and about a host of issues. But more so, of the two of us, you fail to provide any hint as to what your true opinion on any issue is or why you feel as you do. Worse, you offer nothing as to what is wrong with the positions with which you disagree. You simply disagree. Big deal. Who cares?
Boring is a matter of personal opinion and not an opinion of yours that is of any importance whatsoever. That a troll finds me boring is no indictment of the quality of my commentary. That you find me boring is insignificant and of no value.
But this:
"I find you to be a lying egomaniac."
...is nothing more but another baseless accusation unsupported by you with any evidence, links or anything. Again, mere subjective opinion of no value as a stand alone statement. Who cares what you think?
So, one more time:
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions?"
Pick one. I'm most interested in the last one, so if you respond to that, then you'll get your answer to the Davis question. I've all ready to go with that. How badly do you want it? Enough to actually engage? I doubt you have the courage. Oh! Is that too much of a bully tactic for little Parkie? Tough.
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions?"
I've told you. You choose not to listen / read. Much like you're homophobic / racist comments, we have pasted the number of times I care to explain it to you.
"Is that too much of a bully tactic for little Parkie?"
No. Being a bully is exhibited through your relentless name calling and degrading comments.
"Tough"
Ma.. you're all talk.. no action.
After asking yet again...
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions?"
...the troll dares to respond:
"I've told you. You choose not to listen / read."
...yet the following are the only responses he's posted:
"lol.. ma.. you complain about the MSM. You complain about Obama being elected. You complain that the world doesnt work the way you think it should. You use nutty fringe blogs to support your opinions and listen to conservative talk radio."
".. hmm... You have heard of the mainstream? If you have to parse this, you have already lost."
I don't understand how either answers any of the three questions. That's likely because they don't. At all.
Then he says...
"Much like you're homophobic / racist comments, we have pasted the number of times I care to explain it to you."
You would think he could find one example of my so-called hatred for either homos or blacks. Just one from the many he claims exist. (Now, I deleted one of his corrections and I don't think he even corrected himself properly, posting this---pasted=passed---which doesn't make any sense in the comment above. I think he means "posted", but that doesn't help that much either.) But who is "we"? Parkie cannot honestly include himself in any "we" (unless he means himself and the crabs in his shorts) since he has never explained at any time how any of my comments demonstrate hatred on my part for either homos or blacks. So he lies once again.
He goes on to drool...
"No. Being a bully is exhibited through your relentless name calling and degrading comments."
Once again, I only respond as you insist I respond by your incessantly provocative comments, which themselves are posted for the purpose of demeaning me and/or my guests. To now whine about being bullied is laughable, to say nothing of hypocritical, since they appear sans substance or serious counterpoint. I am not moved that you now show weakness in the face of being exposed for the troll you have always been.
Finally, there's this curious comment:
"Tough"
Ma.. you're all talk.. no action."
What does this mean, I wonder? Is the troll challenging me? I mean, what more can one do on a blog but talk? To what other action can he be referring? He should email his answer to these questions to avoid further embarrassment.
But for all else, there is only one more chance. Answer the questions now posted for a fourth time...
"Who is defining "mainstream" or "conventional"? What polls are you using to insist I am outside of convention? What is "unconventional" about ANY of my positions?"
...or go away. They're easy questions and fear of answering is delaying my opportunity to respond to the Davis question, which I really want to do and am totally prepared and itching to do. C'mon little troll. I know you can do it. I won't even "bully" you.
Well, based on the last two comments of Parkie's that I've just deleted, it's quite obvious the little troll doesn't have the courage to answer simple questions while at the same time believing he is in a position to demand anything from me. What he demands, by the way, is something that has been expressed before and would not be new. I may go ahead and comment anyway, since I did have a desire to weigh in on the subject of the Davis execution anyway. We'll see. What is becoming most apparent is that the little weasel doesn't even understand the accusations he makes. That can be the only explanation for why he refuses to elaborate on them and support them with any evidence. He's just parroting the false charges of other liberals with no brain of his own to explore the differences between the two ideologies. Many libs are like that.
I have to respond to one more comment of stupidity:
"
"That can be the only explanation for why he refuses to elaborate on them and support them with any evidence."
lol.. ma.. I've told you 1,000 times. You choose not to understand. Either stop lying or get over it. I'm guessing you will continue to not understand."
Idiot (yes, I'm calling you what you are every time I respond to you---stop whining about what your many comments have demanded from me). You've only accused me 1000 times, but you've never explained why those accusations are appropriate. Thus, there is no lie on my part. Yeah, I get you think I'm a racist and homophobe. No, you have not provided any evidence or argument to support this contention. Merely copying and pasting incomplete and out of context portions of my comments does not provide this insight. It only reiterates that you think the incomplete and out of context portions of my comments are racist or homophobic.
What I've just provided is an argument for why you are an idiot. See how that works? I've given something that, if you are honest and willing to prove me wrong with evidence, you can now do so because of my explanation. You can't, because there is no such evidence available, though you are welcome to try. This is something YOU need to get over. I have no fear of anything your small mind might conjure as you are incapable of proving me wrong.
Oh, I missed THIS gem:
"Coming from the guy that sees no problem using the terms "fag" or "homo"."
No. I have no problem using an abbreviation for a legitimate term that accurately describes the people about whom I'm speaking. None whatsoever. I have no problem calling evil what it is, nor do I have a problem calling a sinful behavior what it is or calling those who engage in the sinful behavior what they are. Why the hell would I? Because they claim speaking the truth is offensive? That's really too bad.
As to the use of the word "fag", no, I don't have a big problem with it, though I don't use it here. But again, it is only a slang for a person who engages in bad behavior, just as they try to insist I use the word "gay". I don't believe I'm under any obligation to adhere to the wishes of those who engage in bad behavior as regards how I refer to them. But if you think that means I hate them, you'll have to explain how that works. I don't hate thieves, but I might use any number of words to describe them. This is your problem. You don't have the honesty that would easily distinguish between such actions on my part. No. You lie about my intentions and actions in your defense of the indefensible. Typical.
"You lie about my intentions and actions in your defense of the indefensible. Typical."
Yet.. another lie. Typical.
Ma. We, obviously, have a disagreement on this topic. I explain to you why you are homophobic. You give a reason for why you are not. You find my explanation inadequate, while I find you defense poor (to say the least). Same thing goes for your reasoning behind the name calling. Such is life. One day I hope you can find the strength to be a better human being. Until then, at least recognize that I have provided you with an example as to why I find your opinions homophobic. Further, you can stop the whining and crying when I do make these observations. Its getting really old, and nobody likes a crybaby.
As for Troy Davis, I dont care if you ever post on capital punishment or not. I thought it was an interesting topic. Of which you decided to ignore in favor of throwing a hissy fit.
The troll is absolutely delusional.
""You lie about my intentions and actions in your defense of the indefensible. Typical."
Yet.. another lie. Typical."
Not at all. It would be nice to see some support for your objection. I hope you won't offer the following as an example of support. That would be pathetic:
"I explain to you why you are homophobic. You give a reason for why you are not. You find my explanation inadequate, while I find you defense poor (to say the least)."
Perhaps its just that you have a distinctly personal definition of the term "homophobic", but I cannot recall any explanation of yours why I could possibly be so. I have to believe it is simply a case that if a homo or a homo enabler, whichever of the two you are, happens to insist a word or action is homophobic, then voila! it is.
But that puts you in some position of importance, one that grants you some standing that entitles you to make such judgements which becomes fact and reality. So sorry to tell you that you are not so significant, if you are significant at all. Which I doubt.
But what is more to the point is that I don't find your explanations inadequate. I can't. You don't provide one. You simply accuse. Perhaps you could spend less time trying to pretend you've EVER posted anything of substance and go find the thread where you actually have provided such insights. I know I can't recall anything like one from you. If you insist you have, then surely you have some idea of what discussion it appeared and you can then link to it and provide the date and time of your profound expressions and I can then peruse it, as can anyone else who might give a rat's ass, to which I will gladly give you proper recognition. I'll wait here.
Furthermore, you claim you find my defense poor. No shit, Sherlock. What you can't claim is that you've ever provided an argument that explain what makes it so. Again, link to the post and give date and time of the argument. I'll wait here.
"Same thing goes for your reasoning behind the name calling."
Oh. You don't like my reasons for calling you "idiot" when you post idiotic comments with no substance? You don't like my reasons for calling you "troll-boy" after months and months of nothing but drive by comments failing to demonstrate cleverness, wit or true insights on ANY topic you've chosen to soil with your presence? Once again, child, if you insist on acting like an idiot, I can only assume you are indeed an idiot, especially after countless attempts to draw out from you something more substantial than your typical drivel. Now, after all that, you weep over how badly you're being treated. I am unmoved. SUCH is life.
moving on...
"One day I hope you can find the strength to be a better human being."
A daily prayer of my own, Parkie. I pray as much for you as well. Or are you arrogant, too, and believe you have no need for such introspection?
"Until then, at least recognize that I have provided you with an example as to why I find your opinions homophobic."
But you haven't. EVER. So how can I? Here's a way: Link, date and time. OR, actually provide an explanation right now. (You'll have to start with defining what you mean by "homophobic".)
"Further, you can stop the whining and crying when I do make these observations."
I don't whine. I don't cry. You can't even prove THAT, but what I actually do is continue to hope and pray you'll deliver some reason for the observations. What about my comments is "homophobic" to you? Don't tell me its the use of a legitimate abbreviation, such as "homo". Tell me why that use is "homophobic".
"As for Troy Davis, I dont care if you ever post on capital punishment or not. I thought it was an interesting topic."
No. You thought it was a great way to change the subject, likely to find some "evidence" of racism (as the original comment bringing it up led to a false statement about me believing no racism exists in this country), or simply because you were having your head handed to you once again regarding your "Parkie-like" comments and behavior. In any event, we now see that your request for my opinion on the Davis case was NOT sincere since you claim to not care about it now. More dishonesty.
And what you call a "hissy-fit" is simply a more accurate rendering of this ongoing and boring conversation. YOU are the one having a hissy fit as you continue to whine about being bullied.
Im amazed you can put together the amount of hate you do on a daily basis. It would seem exhausting. Go outside.. enjoy the day. Enjoy the weekend.
I think I get it now. By this...
"Im amazed you can put together the amount of hate you do on a daily basis."
...you're referring to how small the amount of hate contained in my comments, as in, NONE. That's the only way you could make such a statement and be honest at the same time. OR, you are engaging in more pathetic accusations for which you cannot find proof.
Yeah. It's the latter. Let me know when you can point to any hate professed in any of my comments. And keep in mind, hating is not a problem, even for God. It is what or who one hates that is. So, if I'm the hater you pretend I am, there must be some proof that I hate anyone somewhere in any of the comments or posts I've ever published. Find one, link to it and present it here for our perusal.
Post a Comment