I was going to write a post and focus on the many examples of leftist crazy which happens on social media constantly, and of course refer to our own crazy-ass fake Christian marxist, Dan Trabue.
Then Charlie Kirk was murdered.
There's crazy and then there's truly bat-shit crazy and what we've been seeing and hearing all day since this vicious example of what the "progressive left" truly is, the outpouring of hatred by the "peace loving progressives" is about as sick and twisted as Dan is just getting up in the morning. No....scratch that. As loathsome as Dan is, I don't want to get too glib about this murder. Dan's a card-carrying piece of shit, but this is about his "tribe".
Right from the start, lefty news media was on the job, being assholes, because what else are lefties but assholes? I saw a montage of leftist response on various news shows and it was disgusting and abhorrent. One asshole suggested it might have been the result of a MAGA person celebrating, apparently by firing a rifle into a crowd. There was several who hatefully referred to Kirk as "divisive" and "polarizing". But then, speaking truthfully tends to have that effect. The left hates the truth so division forms.
And then there's the run of the mill, everyday progressive assholes who celebrated the murder of a guy whose shit has more class than any of them have:
https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/10/hope-the-bullets-okay-here-are-the-demonic-reactions-from-leftists-to-charlie-kirk-assassination/?sfnsn=mo
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/09/charlie_kirk_and_the_madness_of_the_left.html
What kind of asshole derives joy out of the murder of a political opponent? The progressive assholes who make up Dan's "tribe". And who's most likely to perpetrate these types of heinous crimes against their political/ideological opponents? The progressive assholes who make up Dan's "tribe".
No doubt we'll hear from Dan distancing himself from these people, insisting the typical progressive is peace loving and this guy is yet another of the many outliers who aren't NOT typical. Yeah. Right.
The worst of the worst of us are lefties. May God protect us from them, I pray in Christ's Name. In the meantime, maybe I'll carry more often from now on.
31 comments:
The likelihood that Dan will address this on his won steam seems low. If he does, or if he's forced to, it'll be the same old regurgitated talking points. I find it hard to believe that he'll spend much time at all calling out those celebrating, just as he didn't after 10/7.
Knowing a little bit about Utah, I hesitate to jump to conclusions about the motivation of the shooter at this point. I can absolutely see some whack job Mormon who's pissed about Kirk spreading Christianity into Zion doing this.
Having said that, the roots of all of the left wing celebration of this go back to the "Is it ok to punch a NAZI." from a few years ago. Obviously the answer to that question from the left was, "It is absolutely ok to punch a NAZI." Once you cross the line of doing violence to those your disagree with politically, and go whole hog into demonizing your political opponents, this is just a harder punch. It's a question of degree, nothing more. Once political violence is on the table (Trump assassination attempts, Softball game shooting, SCOTUS threats, CEO murder, riots, arson, attacks on police...) then
contd.
then this is just the next logical step. To kill someone who advocated for respectful, civil, dialogue.
I have to say, and I will post on this soon, I was and am surprised by the number of people who've come out publicly and said some version of "I didn't agree with Charlie, but he had me on his show and was incredibly nice and respectful to me.". This gives me a little hope for some on the left.
https://x.com/_siakamassaquoi/status/1965878509710225823?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Sorry for the multiple comments, but it's almost 24 hours after the Kirk killing and you know who has remained silent on both his cesspool and FB. While the Troll seems to be making excuses to justify the killing.
Failure to respond to this unprovoked, unjustified, killing would seem to render any claims of "moral" superiority or "reasoned morality" completely meaningless. Failure to strongly condemn those who rejoice, shows a morality deficit that cannot be measured.
The ammunition for the rifle used has transgender and antifascist messages. Two bits says it's a radical transgender.
Ah! The true outliers of the left, perhaps? Most of the left seem to be pricks.
No worries. It's a serious thing and you fan feel free to express your thoughts.
The troll submitted a comment for publication here. I didn't read it before deleting it. Confidence was low that it would've been respectful and rational.
I don't want to speculate, but recent events make the odds worth the wager. Reports suggest they're hot on the asshole's trail and closing in. I hope it won't be long.
Craig...
Failure to respond to this unprovoked, unjustified, killing would seem to render any claims of "moral" superiority or "reasoned morality" completely meaningless. Failure to strongly condemn those who rejoice, shows a morality deficit that cannot be measured.
I'm currently working 2 jobs and recovering from a minor surgery. If I don't respond quickly enough for you, you're just going to have to practice some of that Grace of our Lord, Jesus.
Since you want to know:
This death/assassination is a horrible thing. You can know that's my position because I'm always against senseless violence, so you really didn't need to wonder what my position is.
This is a great tragedy and a great wrong, whether the shooter turns out to be liberal-leaning, conservative-leaning or just plain confused and apolitical. That this young man's family is now missing their husband/father is a tragedy.
ALL violence and attacks and deliberate efforts to harm innocent people is a great wrong and evil.
It was wrong when Representative Hortman and her husband were assassinated by a right leaning anti-abortion religious zealot. (by the way, how long did it take you to condemn those murders? Did you condemn your Felon for choosing to NOT fly the flags at half-staff? For his joking about these assassinations and not reaching out to Governor Walz because "it's a waste of time" and who went GOLFING on the day of Hortman's funeral? Did you say ANYTHING about all of that?)
It was wrong when the Felon consistently (for over ten years, now) called Liberals, Democrats, judges who disagreed with him, the free press, Republicans who disagreed with him, immigrants, etc, etc, etc "fascists," "Totalitarians," "enemies of the state" and otherwise demonized political enemies. It was wrong when Kirk did the same.
It was wrong for the Felon and Kirk to attack LGBTQ folks and advocate policies that will and have caused harm to them and endangered them and their basic human rights.
Violence is wrong and you can KNOW that I'm opposed to it because I'm consistently opposed to harming innocent people. EVEN IF they espouse evil, awful, damaging claims about others.
And that's the difference between you all and me, it appears.
But you tell me: WILL you condemn as grossly evil the religious conservative assassin of Hortman? WILL you condemn the inflammatory language used by the Felon and the late Mr Kirk? Will you condemn his overtly racist and sexist and anti-trans language they've used?
I hope so, but you tell me.
As for me, you already know my position.
And yes, anyone who is actually celebrating Mr Kirk's murder should be ashamed of themselves. AND, anyone who is using this murder to suggest that "the Democrats will pay for this!" are ALSO in the wrong, especially when we literally don't know the motive of the shooter.
I've not seen any liberals rejoicing in this death. I HAVE seen some (who have been harmed by his harmful attacking words against LGBTQ and black folk) say they won't be mourning him, but that's not the same as rejoicing in his death.
And given his vulgar verbal attacks on women, black people, immigrants and LGBTQ folks, you can't blame them (or their allies) for not really mourning his death - his words and policies he's advocated HAVE caused harm to innocent people, and that harm, too, is wrong.
But that's not the same as celebrating.
And I have seen WAY more conservatives using this to justify a war or attacks on liberals, even though they don't know the motive of the shooter(s). (See Marshal and Glenn's rumor-mongering about the shooter being trans).
Will you condemn THOSE harmful attacks, too?
Or are you thinking we should show empathy (something that Kirk condemned) for conservatives when they're harmed, but not for others who are harmed?
You tell me. You know my answer.
Conservatives advocating for war and punishment of liberals and immigrants - without ANY evidence of anything - in the aftermath of the Kirk assassination:
“If they won’t leave us in peace, then our choice is to fight or die,” wrote Elon Musk on X.
“They are at war with us, whether we want to accept it or not. What are we gonna do about it?” Fox News host Jesse Watters said on air Wednesday night. “Everybody’s accountable … the politicians, the media, and all these rats out there. This can never happen again. It ends now. This is a turning point and we know which direction we’re going.”
“We are up against demonic forces from the pit of Hell,” wrote commentator and podcaster Matt Walsh on X. “This is existential. A fight for our own existence and the existence of our country.”
The Felon: put out a video statement on Wednesday night saying that rhetoric from “the radical left” was “directly responsible for the terrorism we are seeing in our country today”.
Without ANY evidence of motive.
White supremacist Matt Forney, in a post that has been viewed over one million times, compared Kirk’s death to the Reichstag fire of 1933 (the arson attack on the German parliament building by a Dutch communist, which Hitler used to justify his aggressive crackdown against communists). “It is time for a complete crackdown on the left,” said Forney. “Every Democratic politician must be arrested and the party banned under RICO … they caused this.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-death-trump-reaction
“This is a war, this is a war, this is a war,” said [literal hatemonger idiot] Alex Jones
Rhodes then called on Trump to “do what’s right, what’s necessary” and “invoke the Insurrection Act” in the wake of the shooting. “You should declare the left in this country is in obvious open rebellion against the law of the United States. They’re committing insurrection, they're aiding and abetting an invasion, and they're blocking the execution of federal law,” Rhodes said....
“You could be next,” influencer and unofficial Trump adviser Laura Loomer posted on X. “The Left are terrorists.”
Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist who popularized the demonization of critical race theory, suggested in a post on X that the “radical left” was responsible for the shooting, and urged the US government “to infiltrate, disrupt, arrest, and incarcerate all of those who are responsible for this chaos.”
Republican representative Derrick Van Orden from Wisconsin also blamed the shooting on “leftwing political violence” and warned on X that “whoever does not condemn this is part of the problem. The gloves are off.”
https://www.wired.com/story/far-right-reactions-charlie-kirk-shooting-civil-war/
etc, etc. WILL YOU condemn these ignorant attacks on innocent liberals and Democrats and denounce any calls for retribution (sans evidence) by the rightwing nutjobs out there fomenting unrest and violence against fellow citizens?
Again, you can KNOW my response. I'm quite dubious of yours.
Maybe, I'm not sure. What is interesting is comparing the response of those on the right to the MN legislator shootings, to many of those on the left now.
Part of the point is that people who knew Kirk, liked and respected hi regardless of whether or not they agreed with him. At one point, I was convinced that I could sit down and have a beer with Dan (before he made a point of proudly announcing his abstinence) and actually have an enjoyable conversation. I'm not sure anymore, but some people who should have strongly disliked Kirk have been eloquent in their praise for him.
I occaisionally get a gist of his topic in the first line before I delete his comments.
The pictures and video of the shooter seem to contradict this, at least potentially.
I do suspect that if it's a leftist, that it'll be a radical "trans"/alphabet soup supporter.
As noted elsewhere, I wouldn't discount the possibility of an extremist Mormon who objected to Kirk's presentation of a Gospel that might not go over well in parts of UT.
I saw a piece yesterday which suggests that there is a nihilistic subculture which many of these younger shooters seem to have embraced. From what I saw, it seems to be left leaning (I'd argue that nihilism falls on the left side of the political spectrum). Obviously there have been an increasing number of "trans" shooters as well.
I watched some of Charlie Kirk's videos after the reports because before then I knew the name but not much else. His stock in trade seemed to be engaging in "debate" with students who were ill-prepared for his tactics. He constantly interrupted them while they were talking, which is performance, not honest debate. On other videos he engaged mostly in sloganeering and question-begging. Maybe I just had a bad selection, but I doubt it. Anyhow, he never should have been assassinated.
Me, too. This time I simply saw his name and hit "delete".
As we can see in Dan's latest offerings here (there should be three, but I deleted one due to his indulgence in his typical perverse Trump-hatred), he tries the moral equivalency route, pretending the Hortman killings were met with exactly the same type of celebratory response we're seeing from his people.
I do appreciate lefties expressing sympathy for Kirk and his family as well as opposition to these constant violent attacks. If only there were more of that than the attacks themselves.
You're clearly working off a small sample size. I've seen him interrupt, but typically I see him preventing filibustering and/or guiding his opponent (usually a college or high school student) back to the point. He's generally debating multiple people and as such he can't be mucking about with nonsense, as so many wish to have their turn with him. That lowers the probability of a perfect rendering of his positions, but doesn't make them bad positions.
You might not like his style, but he's been effective at confronting common lefty fallacies with truth and hard facts. As to "sloganeering and question-begging", I'd be keen on seeing a few examples with your explanation as to how they they're either.
Jesse,
I have watched many, many of Kirk's videos and the only time I ever saw him interrupt was when the person refused to give him a chance to respond or if the person was spewing lies and such. 90% of the time it was the other person who continually interrupted.
I'll tell you what, you must be watching a whole different person from the hundreds of videos I've seen. "sloganeering and question-begging"?!? Examples, please.
The only reason the students were ill prepared because that's how they come out of public schools and colleges/universities. All they get from this rancid educational system is propaganda indoctrination.
Charley was a genius
"If I don't respond quickly enough for you, you're just going to have to practice some of that Grace of our Lord, Jesus."
Way to misinterpret what I actually said to paint yourself as a victim.
"by the way, how long did it take you to condemn those murders?"
I literally condemned those murders within 12 hours of them being reported.
I'm not playing your bash Trump, false equivalence game.
"But you tell me: WILL you condemn as grossly evil the religious conservative assassin of Hortman?"
1. We don't have definitive proof that the shooter was "conservative".
2. Notwithstanding that bit of minutia, I condemned the shooter/shooting within hours of seeing the reporting on local news. I believe it was a Friday night/Saturday when it happened, and I was up pretty early that Saturday. I had a condemnation written by early afternoon on Saturday.
3. This is bullshit. You demand that I specifically condemn this in very specific ways, while you continue to offer your bland, vague, general, platitudes.
WILL you condemn the inflammatory language used by the Felon and the late Mr Kirk? Will you condemn his overtly racist and sexist and anti-trans language they've used?
I have repeatedly condemned the language used by Trump, and in the absence of proof of "inflammatory language" on the part of Kirk, so I won't condemn what doesn't exist. "inflammatory langue" is protected by the 1st amendment and isn't grounds for murder.
As you give little evidence of actually having listened to Kirk, and complete unawareness of the number of Alphabet soup, and POC, who call him a friend, I'll wait until you prove your bullshit false claims, or admit your slander.
Again, listen to what people say and read what people write. What IS being said is that the huge number of people responding with glee to this murder is going to drive more mainstream people away from the DFL. When y'all harbor insane people who are threatening Vance and other conservatives with harm or death, you need to accept that there might be consequences.
If such attacks are real, of course. But you making vague, general, claims isn't helpful.
If all you're going to base your claims on is second or third hand information, don't bother the expect your bullshit to be taken seriously. Kirk was referring to what some call "Toxic Empathy", and was very clear about what he actually said and meant.
I've showed sympathy for all sorts of people. I show sympathy for the thousands of children raped in Europe courtesy of the type of immigration policies you support. Unlike you.
If your response to the assassination of a significant figure on the conservative side of the aisle, the gleeful, hateful, celebration of this event along with the death threats to other conservatives, is to blame other conservatives then screw you. Your moral code is shit and you disgust me.
If a college student was unprepared for engaging in a debate with someone who's "tactics" are well known and publicly available, isn't it their own fault for stepping up to the microphone to debate? I guess asking questions and knowing facts is somehow some tricky debate tactic. FYI, when these kids step up, many of them bash him for not having a degree, then are unable to answer simple questions.
Nice try. There is no one on the left who does anything close to what Kirk does. He goes into hostile crowds regularly and responds to anyone. No curated crowds of supporters, no bullshit, just an open mic.
This second and third hand bullshit is getting old. Hell even Steven King had to apologize for believing lies spread by the left.
One of my favoriet clips is him sitting silently waiting for a young woman to make her point/ask her question while she simply complains that he "won't let her talk". He's literally set his mic down and is just looking at her make a complete fool of herself.
Sure, preparation matters—but I’m not here to grade students on how well they perform in someone else’s viral clip.
Nice try right back at ya. Most of these talking heads—left or right—are just echo chambers with a fanbase. I’ve got better things to do than watch political theater dressed up as "intellectual" debate. That said, I get why some people might find Kirk’s approach compelling—there’s value in showing up and engaging.
So one author changed his mind—cool story, not that I cared anyway. That doesn’t make every criticism “lies” or every disagreement “bullshit.” If we’re going to dismiss everything as second-hand, maybe we should start with the talking points people repeat without ever checking the source.
Thanks for playing.
This person is always so hateful. She really needs a ladder to get over herself:
https://x.com/JasmineForUS/status/1961555259324776528?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
How can one live in the real world if he cannot accept the fact that there are many others who see things differently and even many different ways than himself? Honestly, I laughed out loud as I read this text. I would have laughed in Crockett's face if she had been near me. She isn't worthy of the last name that she has.
"I'm currently working 2 jobs and recovering from a minor surgery."
So they removed your head from your ass easily I trust?
"If I don't respond quickly enough for you..."
I don't care how long it takes you to respond. I care that you stop responding with lies and insults about YOUR president. One of the worst lies you commonly tell these days is that he's a "felon" simply because a kangaroo court with a predetermined verdict found him guilty, surprise surprise. I deleted your third comment because it was the worst of the three, but any repeat of this bullshit won't result in such a gracious response.
"ALL violence and attacks and deliberate efforts to harm innocent people is a great wrong and evil."
Unless they're in the womb, then you defend the violent attacks which are deliberate efforts to harm these most innocent of people, you hypocritical shithead.
"It was wrong when the" [best president since Reagan] "consistently (for over ten years, now) called Liberals, Democrats, judges who disagreed with him, the free press, Republicans who disagreed with him, immigrants, etc, etc, etc "fascists," "Totalitarians," "enemies of the state" and otherwise demonized political enemies. It was wrong when Kirk did the same."
I don't recall Donald Trump...the president who is far superior to any for whom you've ever voted or hoped to see behind the Resolute Desk...ever used the words "fascists" or "Totalitarians" to describe the leftist enemies of the state, but I could be wrong. But as opposed to Trump, they're clearly more deserving due to their actions and policies.
In the meantime, Trump is called all manner of things by progressives which cannot be connected to anything he's done policy-wise. It's just how leftists treat better people. And let's be clear..."demonize" is a conscious attempt to portray an generally decent person as a horrible person. This is what YOU do constantly with regard to our president, and what you're now also doing regarding Kirk.
But when one is already a scumbag, like the left in general, but more specifically the leftist politicians, leftist media people, leftists activist judges, etc., it's not "demonizing" to point out the truly demonic. That would be YOUR people (as well as you in particular).
"It was wrong for the" [greatest president since Reagan] "and Kirk to attack LGBTQ folks and advocate policies that will and have caused harm to them and endangered them and their basic human rights."
There have been no such policies advocated by either the president who is a far better man than you'll ever be, or Charlie Kirk, who now dead will continue to be a far better Christian than you pretend to be, which have caused any queers any harm, you lying sack of shit. And thus you again demonize good people, while defending those plagued by the demonic.
"Violence is wrong and you can KNOW that I'm opposed to it because I'm consistently opposed to harming innocent people."
Unless they're in the womb and then all bets are off. Rip them to shreds if you want to do so. You're also not so keen on opposing policies Joe Biden enacted which gravely harmed thousands of Americans. So you're a liar.
"And that's the difference between you all and me"
Yeah. You lie. We don't. You hate. We don't. You defend and promote perversion and the murder of innocents. We don't.
More coming now....
"But you tell me: WILL you condemn as grossly evil the religious conservative assassin of Hortman?"
I condemn any murderer. I'm unaware of the Hortman's assassin being a "religious conservative". I've tried to find anything which suggests this. What I've found is that he worked for Tim Waltz or was appointed by Waltz to some position or other in the state's government. I've found that he had in his car a significant amount of leftist literature of some kind. I've found nothing thus far which suggests he's conservative at all, though I wouldn't go so far, at this point, as to say he wasn't. I will confidently state that it is absolutely routine for criminal shooters to be assumed by leftists to be conservative from the jump until all info comes out. I'm also quite confident you'll do no more than the most cursory search for such info if you do any at all. If you it, it's likely a lie. So you're mandated here to support all your claims with actual verifiable evidence.
"WILL you condemn the inflammatory language used by the" [the best president since Reagan] and the late Mr Kirk?"
There's been none. You count as "inflammatory" anything which conflicts with the lies you espouse. Speaking the truth is always "inflammatory" to those for whom the truth is inconvenient. Those would be liars like you.
"Will you condemn his overtly racist and sexist and anti-trans language they've used?"
Neither use "overtly racist and sexist and anti-trans language". You're just lying again. They don't even use language which any honest person might mistake for possibly being even slightly racist and sexist or "anti-trans" language.
"As for me, you already know my position."
Yeah...pro=-perv and pro-infanticide...and very anti-Christian.
"...anyone who is using this murder to suggest that "the Democrats will pay for this!" are ALSO in the wrong, especially when we literally don't know the motive of the shooter."
Well, we do now. We may not have when you first submitted this diatribe, but we do now. He's a lefty.
But as far as Dems paying, that means a variety of things, but it's not likely to manifest in violent response...as badly as you'd like to see that because it would validate your many claims that conservatives are violent. This heinous act, and the response to it by your kind has elevated the probability of winning more seats in Congress in '26 and other political defeats by your party. THAT is a form of manifested Dem payment for this murder. I've seen a bunch of videos of people insisting they're done with your kind and no longer wish to be in any way connected to your kind. THAT is a form of manifested payment for this murder. Pistol sales will probably spike because of this murder due to people afraid of being shot by lefties.
More coming....
"I've not seen any liberals rejoicing in this death."
Not anywhere near "hard to find". Try actually looking when you're told your kind is acting badly again.
"I HAVE seen some (who have been harmed by his harmful attacking words against LGBTQ and black folk) say they won't be mourning him..."
You're a perverted liar. No one has been "harmed" by anything Kirk's ever said. "Hurt feelings", when facing someone speaking the truth doesn't count. You couldn't....even if I helped you lie....present any evidence of any harm resulting from Kirk's honest and factual comments about either your perverts or black people.
"And given his vulgar verbal attacks on women, black people, immigrants and LGBTQ folks, you can't blame them (or their allies) for not really mourning his death..."
Kirk has NEVER indulged in "vulgar verbal attacks" on ANYONE, you lying little bitch. Those whose feelings are hurt from hearing the truth should mourn their own eternal destination.
"...his words and policies he's advocated HAVE caused harm to innocent people..."
Bullshit. Provide evidence or retract this comment and apologize for daring to write what you only wish was true. The only way his words could possibly have caused any harm to actually innocent people is if some queer hears him tell the truth about being queer and the queer goes out and shoots up a school full of kids. The innocent in this case being the kids.
"And I have seen WAY more conservatives using this to justify a war or attacks on liberals, even though they don't know the motive of the shooter(s). (See Marshal and Glenn's rumor-mongering about the shooter being trans)."
First of all, you lying, Christ-hating fuck...Glenn and I were speaking about what was reported about the the weapon and cartridges found after the murder. Try reading something other than pro-perv sites.
Secondly, it is not unusual for those under attack to wonder if return fire is appropriate. You're such a fucking turd of a pervert human being. When black people rant about cops targeting blacks, you're all on board and rationalize any who might then murder cops. But we're supposed to just sit back and pretend there's no growing violent animus against us by your kind. You're fucking turd of a pervert human being. There's not an honest corpuscle in your God-hating body. These people are talking about self-defense, not attacking people who can't be identified as the scummiest and most likely violent Dan-like person. We don't operate like your kind. We try to get along. Your kind murders. But keep pushing.
A little more coming...
"Or are you thinking we should show empathy (something that Kirk condemned) for conservatives when they're harmed, but not for others who are harmed?"
First of all, you pervert of a turd of low class Christ-hater, Kirk NEVER condemned empathy. Why do you even comment on things about which you know nothing. Oh...never mind... I know the answer: You're an asshole.
The concept of empathy has been perverted (what a surprise) by your kind. You use it to legitimize the illegitimate.
We do NOT celebrate anyone's murder.
Way back when John Wayne Gacy was on death row, and his appeals ran out unsuccessfully, there was a morning talk show host on WLS radio in Chicago named Don Wade (and his wife, Roma), who were originally just disk jockeys until the station turned to talk. This was a local guy and Gacy's sentence was about to be carried out. Wade spoke of going to the prison and demonstrating in celebration of Gacy's well deserved execution being carried out. I was appalled and tried repeatedly to get through to his radio show to express my strong disapproval of his attitude regarding this execution. This guy pretty much postured as a conservative and was indulging in what I still regard as reprehensible behavior. Gacy deserved his sentence. He murdered so many. But there's a big ass difference between seeing justice done, being relieved a threat is eliminated versus a celebration of his death.
I didn't celebrate when Osama bin Lade was taken out. I didn't celebrate when Qassem Soleimani was taken out. While I agree with such actions, I am saddened they made themselves worthy of those just punishments. THAT is how I see the deaths of my enemies. I'd prefer they cut the crap and be cool. The prefer otherwise, and when that preference results in their deaths, it's not a reason to celebrate. I sympathize with their victims, not with them. But while I don't sympathize, I'd much prefer they didn't choose the path they chose.
I didn't celebrate when Horton was killed, or Pelosi's husband was attacked or when Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies or when Ted Kennedy died. I doubt you could find too many conservatives who do, because we don't have as many assholes among us as the horde of them associated with your kind. Including you, you baby-killing asshole.
Well, she's certainly bat-shit crazy, that's for sure! She's kinda cute, though. I wonder what she looks like with all the enhancements (most of which constitute cultural appropriation, though, right?).
Craig had a link to a comment made by my current favorite movie reviewer, the great "Critical Drinker", in which is expressed his opposition to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Now, I present two videos from one of my favorite "historians", a man who goes by the name of "the Metatron" (look it up). The dude's always informative as well as entertaining in the process. Looking for a diversion from all things Charlie, I chose to see what he's been covering. Turns out, it's been Charlie Kirk and his stuff is as good as always:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et5NmxZqiBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YDzf5E6PRU&t=13s
Post a Comment