I've been struggling to decide on what to post. A combination of low motivation together with an abundance of distractions has given me little time to do more than post comments elsewhere. Doing a proper post requires more work. Yet, while commenting elsewhere, especially at Dan's Blog of Lies and Perversion (a newer title I'll be using for the foreseeable future), I tend to collects several links which provide evidence for the facts I present there, though Dan will often delete them without a true perusal and never with any fact based counter response. In any case, I have lots of stuff which actually does support my positions and, as always, totally destroys his. This poses a problem for me, as there is so much that it will be difficult to determine just how to proceed. Thus, I might jump around a bit, and I'm thinking I will simply do something resembling a round up, as we commonly see at Craig's blog or Stan's every Saturday, or maybe just publish a separate post for different angles my stack of stuff can generate. It will all revolve around the case of one Mahmoud Khalil, who is being detained and likely deported for his leading and participation in anti-Semitic events on college campuses and elsewhere. True reprobates like Dan falsely claim this is some kind of infringement on free speech, as if foreigners are welcome to come to our land and speak out against our government and those of our allies, accusing us of being the bad guys responsible for the suffering they themselves have caused. In any case, there likely will be no rhyme or reason regarding what I post first, but they will indeed all be interconnected. As I proceed, I hope I can make changes if I think it's too convoluted or disjointed. It won't matter with regard to Dan, as he won't be posting anything substantive in response no matter how I do this. He will simply do all which he never allows at his Blog of Lies and Perversions (yeah...I changed it again...plural is better given who hosts the blog).
Anyway, let's get started. I've decided I'm going to begin with CUAD and perhaps some related groups. This is the beginning of explaining why bouncing this dude from our shores was totally justified, and also will show how pathetic Dan's defense of the guy, and those like him, truly is. I submit two pieces, one from CUAD and the other a link I posted at Dan's from the Jerusalem Post:
What are the beliefs of Mahmoud Khalil’s activist group CUAD? - The Jerusalem Post
Columbia University Apartheid Divest: Who we are
What we see in just the two links above are clear presentations of what CUAD is, and their false narratives in support of those who falsely call themselves "Palestinians". Throughout the JP article, we see descriptions which are clearly affirmed by the "Who we are" CUAD editorial. What seems clear is their intention of framing their "struggle"...that is, their defense of their indefensible position...as akin to the struggles of others they claim are victims of oppression. Whether they are or not is not the point. The point is that they are trying to project the lie that the Gazans are such people. They are not. They are inhibited to act as the hateful savages they are and monitored for attempts to do so. What they regard as oppression is akin to a rambunctious child being restrained from hitting the other kids, or an overly aggressive dog tightly leashed to prevent it from snapping at passersby. We approve of evil oppressed by good so that evil is contained at the very least. That's Gaza as it now stands.
Further, CUAD speaks of Gaza as having been mercilessly attacked, despite all IDF actions have been in response to murderous attacks by those the Gazans voted to lead them. Israel warns the citizens they're coming for that purpose. The Gazans restrain their own from fleeing the retribution so richly deserved. And all the while, Israel provides aid to those Gazans caught up in what their own initiated, as if Israel is somehow obliged to do so.
CUAD not only perpetuates lies about the inflated death toll...as well as who's responsible for any of it (it's the Gazans themselves who are), they insist that violence is an acceptable means of "freeing" themselves from the oppression which doesn't exist. They speak of this being acceptable when "peaceful" methods have been exhausted. What methods would those be and when were they the first order of business between them and Israel? From the 1940s, when those who had absolutely no claim to the land fled on the certainty that the four Arab nations which sough to defeat and drive off Israel would succeed and they could return to claim whatever spoils were left in the aftermath. They have no "right of return" as if they were driven off. It wasn't theirs in the first place anyway. Indeed, they hadn't yet claimed the fake name "Palestinian" and hadn't begun to spin the false tale that they were an actual people with an actual history tied to Israel/Judea.
From there, there have been scores of peace treaty attempts by Israel, including driving from Gaza their own people in order to give to the Gazans what was never theirs just to appease their murderous intentions. The same was true with the Fatah factions of the West Bank, who also have no claim to any of that land. Negotiations have been held constantly and constantly the fake "Pallies" rejected it all. There was no "Nakba". There was only treachery and hate for the Jews and the covetous desire to take all of it.
This is what CUAD is and Khalil is a leader in that cause. Nowhere in the manifesto does CUAD speak of peace and brotherhood with the Jews, nor do they speak against the murderous evil of Hamas nor is there a call for Hamas to stand down and stow their weapons. But somehow, apologists and idiots like Dan want us to believe this guy isn't a Hamas shill. It's absurd and more so to pretend it's OK for someone to come to our country, profit by an education in our universities and then dare to organize what are too often violent and destructive "protests" (displaying a kinship with lefties everywhere) and make demands about who the university will support based on the lies they spew about the scum they support. If low character instigators like Khalil truly care about the plight of the so-called "Palestinians", he would be better in their service by going to Gaza and leading them to throw off their hatreds and focusing on their own development as the nation they pretend they are.
That's not happening, though. Instead, we hear crap about "colonialists" and "imperialism" of others, all the while pretending that the history of islam is exactly that in the most negative understanding of the terms. Since the 600s AD, islam has been spread by terror and oppression, taking over, not befriending, and everything they touch becomes theirs forever. They still think Spain is theirs. So they lie about that, too. I'll have more to say about those terms later.
So what we've seen thus far, is reason enough for Marco Rubio to cancel Khalil's green card and send him packing. He's free to take his American wife with him and raise his new kid there while he builds Gaza into a peace loving people seeking true fellowship with the non-muslim world.
Friday, April 11, 2025
Khalil Deserves Deportation...The First Of Possibly Many Arguments To That Fact
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)