This is a case for voting GOP, if by chance anyone has failed to do so as yet.
https://townhall.com/columnists/waynegrudem/2024/10/27/20-reasons-to-vote-for-republicans-and-especially-for-donald-trump-n2646824
I can't see how anyone can vote against these realities simply because the nominee is Donald Trump, who for the most part supports these types of policies.
Like most who have or will vote for Trump, I have a few things of his I oppose:
1. Eliminating income tax on tips and overtime.
2. Support for IVF.
3. Elimination of the GOP's previously full-throated opposition to abortion and respect for human life when it begins, as it always does, at conception.
The first item is likely to have minimal effect on the economy, though it will unfairly help a few people and not a lot of others (as such a degree of unequal application of tax law). Points 2 and 3 are connected and could easily have been one point.
But overall, there's no comparison between how much more beneficial Republican...that is, conservative Republican...policy is over the claptrap that is the Democrat Party policies. And as indicated in the previous post, if one can't clearly and intelligently explain why that's not true, please don't vote. Such a person has no idea of the harm they're inviting by supporting the Democrat Party.
Thursday, October 31, 2024
How Can Anyone Say No To This?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Support for IVF? That is a choice, not a medical necessity and insurance providers should not be covering it, which just adds to insurance costs.
I pushed the button before I was through. I also agree with you about no income tax on tips and overtime. IT'S INCOME!!! Why should it be eliminated. How about not taxing my retirement annuity!
Glenn,
IVF is clearly an elective procedure. It doesn't address the underlying causes of a couple's inability to conceive. There are methods which do and don't result in treating scores of embryos like commodities.
As to taxing income, taxing income which was deferred is just taxing income which hadn't yet been taxed. The waters have been muddied by enacting workarounds like "pre-tax dollars" deferred to grow one's retirement nest egg. We should simply be taxing all income, and savings developed from already taxed income should not be taxed a second time when needed in retirement. Social Security shouldn't be taxed, as it came out of our own money while we worked and thus is a second tax on already taxed income.
Post a Comment