Curious Contradiction?

There are those who regard states like Colorado seeking to remove Trump's name from the ballots as guilty of true voter suppression.  Their excuse for denying him is his guilt for that which he was found not guilty of having perpetrated.  And I agree with this.  It truly is voter suppression.  

But what of term limits?  Is that not also denying a place on a ballot to one deemed no longer eligible simply for having served?  That seems far worse than denying one for an alleged crime...whether it was committed or not!  Indeed, it's punishing them for having ostensibly served the nation honorably.  

Some who righteously oppose the Colorado type suppression at the same time support term limits.  It's among the items brought up when seeking support for a Convention of States under Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  

 Of course, we already have term limits for the office of POTUS, so if Trump survives his many fraudulent attempts to keep him from the White House in November, he'll still be unable to seek a third term.  If he performs no worse than he did while in office the first time, which was far better than the performances of either Obama and certainly the current moron falsely claimed to have actually won the position, I would be inclined to want a third term for him as well.  Why not (setting aside for the sake of conversation how much older he'd be)?  When George W. Bush completed his second term, and we were looking at either Obama or McCain, I was at that time willing to have given Bush a third term if it was legally possible (running as an incumbent without a primary challenger).  Unlike way, way too many, I had looked into Obama and recognized his lack of intelligence and character and saw him as a threat to the good of the nation...a fear fully realized, as it turned out.

I don't want anyone telling me that an office holder with a great record can't be re-elected if that person is willing to continue serving.  I can decide for myself if I think an office holder needs replacing.  

Term limits is true voter suppression.

Justice Denied

 I just read where this E. Jean Carroll hag sought $24 million from Trump for defamation for his response to her wholly unproven accusation of rape from 100 years ago...something the details of which she couldn't remember, nor were any witnesses of any kind brought to bear in support of her allegations.  Instead, however, the jury awarded her over $83 million.  If anyone was defamed here, it was Trump, given her inability to prove her allegations enough to get a guilty verdict in criminal court.  This suggests that civil trials held in order to rob a defendant who isn't convicted of an alleged crime is a problem.  In short, they should not be allowed.  I can see a guilty person being made to compensate monetarily a victim of an actual crime.  But to go after somehow judged not guilty seems unjust in a very real and extreme sense.  

But hey...so long as Trump is the one made to pay, who cares, right?  This is what comes from a nation which has rejected truth and morality.  The real assholes of society will presume to "know" that Trump is guilty, simply due to their irrational hatred of the man.  I can present Dan Trabue as an example of this perversion of humanity.  I personally can't say with any confidence that Trump is either guilty or innocent of raping this person.  While his history of adultery and womanizing isn't a newsflash to anyone, none of the provides any reason to suppose he'd rape anyone at all.  Yet, the haters accept that notion as all but assured and proven.  It's an indictment on so many of their moral corruption.  This is particularly true of those who posture as Christian.  Actual Christians and real Americans don't assume guilt "just because".  

This case is one of the several which should never have seen the inside of a courtroom.  They each are no more than personal attacks...political attacks...on a guy who actually Made American Greater than it had been prior to his time in office.  I can't understand why that's such a problem to any who pretend to care about this nation.  How can anyone who did as well as Trump be so constantly attacked and vilified, especially after so many accusations and allegations against him have turned out to be bullshit?

God save us from the evil who acts this way against a guy who clearly cares more about the nation than his own personal fortunes.  God bless him for caring enough to continually suffer so many unjust indignities thrown his way by a segment of our population which has become horribly vile and contemptible.

Trump is a flawed human being.  Of this there is no doubt and no argument from anyone.  He is nowhere near the degree of flawed human being far worse people continually insist he is.  They hate him because he's done what they can't or won't do.  They hate the nation, while he loves it and wishes to see it become what it was meant to be, not what his haters and detractors are lowering it to be.  

Now he's more likely than ever to be the GOP nominee.  He may maintain support for president regardless of whether or not he falls to the bullshit attempts to criminalize him.  There's not a single Democrat that fucked up and evil party is willing to put up who would serve the nation anywhere near as well as Trump will.  They're all scumbags. 

I'll happily support and imperfect Trump over the best of the left any day.  They are what's wrong with America right now, and some Republicans are as well.  Trump represents those of us who want better than what these assholes have done and will continue to do.  And one thing the left represents without question, is the destruction of a just society.  May the left get what it deserves.  We'll get it, too, if we allow Dems to win in November.

Dan being Dan

It seems little Danny won't play here anymore, and he won't play much at Craig's blog.  You can't imagine how awful I feel.  To lose out on the comedy he brings to the table with each and every spewing of failed leftism is tragic.  One has to go straight to his blog where he'll make demands that one supports a claim one's never made while refusing to support his own claims under the guise of "it's common knowledge" or some other dodge like that.  

In a recent exchange, he made one of his standard claims that we conservatives are a violent lot, looking to cause all manner of death and destruction...because that's what the left is told to believe.  Dan cites some goofy source to validate his claim, and most likely because that's what's implied by the headline of the sourced info.  But the info itself doesn't prove or suggest that at all, even while making the same claim.  The question asked of respondents (a lefty survey is what it is) was basically, "Today, nearly a quarter of Americans (23%) agree that “because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country,” This is portrayed as "support" for violence rather than what truly is the case, which is that true Americans fear violence is what it will take to prevent further erosion of the nation by the Dan Trabues in power relentlessly mucking things up.  It's not like anyone desires taking up arms even against lefties.  Why they didn't simply ask if a respondent is looking to be violent isn't explained.  They simply ask one question, and present it as if it means something the question doesn't affirm.  And Dan runs with it like a happy little girl with a popsicle!

These kinds of distortions of actual conservative/Christian sentiment appears in pretty much every "survey" by "experts" Dan presents to validate his perverse world view and hatred for others.  Another questions the definitionally accurate regard for illegal aliens as "invaders", and even uses the term "invading force" as if they're seen as an army.  While no one suggests an army when justly accusing illegal aliens of invading our country, they accurately represent the very definition of "invaders". 

Elsewhere I saw something which perfectly illustrates the immoral corruption of words and terms in Dan's effort to disparage better people as regards the word "immigrant".  That word implies someone who came legally, not someone who intentionally rejected proper protocols for entering the country.  "Migrant" might work for both, but "immigrant" is not an accurate term for the illegal aliens invading our country.

Dan likes to use this argument to paint better people as "xenophobic", or akin to "white nationalists" who oppose the invasion of illegal aliens because they don't like foreigners.  But these types of people....leftists, mostly...don't like actual immigrants who did indeed follow our laws and protocols.  

So anyway one looks at it, one sees Dan manifesting his blatantly morally corrupt character once again.

As to that, Dan listed his many good works to refute the notion that he's morally corrupt.  He does this ignoring that he ignores the many good deeds Trump has performed (and I've presented them for his edification and like I said, he ignored it) in favor of calling him the most corrupt guy ever.  Doing this is just another way Dan presents as a hypocrite, thereby adding validation to the fact of his corruption.  

But hey...this is among the many reasons few visit his blog and/or allow him to comment at theirs.  He's a pistol!

BIG NEWS!!

 https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/01/ron_desantis_calls_it_quits.html

According to the link above, DeSantis has bowed out!  Sad news in my opinion.  I would much prefer it be Haley (and Asa Huthinson...I didn't even know the dude was still trying!).  

Well...this makes my decision easier when I get to cast my primary choice.  I won't have to vacillate and then second guess until the first year of Trump's/DeSantis' first year is over (I waited for Trump's first year of 2017 for the other shoe to drop, but was relieved to find I made the right choice).  

I've seen it said that DeSantis in the race makes things harder for Trump in terms of beating Haley.  Kind of a stretch, but I get it.  I doubt too many DeSantis supporters will now get on the Haley Train.  Intelligent observers would not suggest that he's not more like Trump than Haley in being non-establishment as well as on actual policy similarities.  

I would hate to think that any of his supporters would refuse to support Trump in the general.  Such people aren't intelligent given what happened the last time Trump was denied.  More importantly, They would be acting contrary to DeSantis' own wishes at this time, that his supporters should rally around Trump.  Here's the link to his concession speech (also linked in the article above), and it's a good one:

https://twitter.com/RonDeSantis/status/1749159384112845285

Now, however, the strife Trump now endures becomes, in my mind, more important than ever.  No one should believe that his luck is without end and that the force allied against him aren't so convicted in their evil desires that they won't up the ante yet again.  All of his legal troubles are no more than fallacious political attacks...not legitimate charges against which anyone else would suffer from these scumbags.  They are enabled by various members of the judiciary, justice system and the great enemy of the people, the mainstream leftist media.  

So our job now becomes to increase our own efforts (assuming we've all been making any effort at all) to keep in regular contact with our senators and reps to support Trump as well and push the America 1st sentiment always.  If you happen to be in a state as I was, where both senators and my rep, were Dems, push them too (as I did) to further truth, justice and righteousness rather than their modern progressive bullshit which has been eroding our way of life for the last fifty years or more.  

Trump...NOT Haley...MUST win in November 2024!

Leftist Shamefulness: "Brutalizers" Edition

The title of this piece is a term used by Dan's troll, feo, and to a lesser extent, by Dan himself.  They apply the term to conservatives, specifically me and others on the blogs, who routinely expose the two of them for the fools they are.  feo has even taken to suggesting I "thrill" to brutalize.  Without any evidence whatsoever, he insists I enjoy seeing people suffer.  He and his benefactor Dan, will speak to how awful I am to blacks, women, homosexuals and other disordered people, as well as those like the Gazastinian civilians who are collateral damage of the actions of their own people against Israel.  

Of course, it's absurd to dare suggest that I "thrill" to see people who have even invited their own demise.  These Gazastinians, for example, or thugs like George Floyd or Michael Brown.  I don't lose any sleep over their meeting their just fates, but I don't enjoy or "thrill" to it.  I'm certainly thrilled to know that fewer bad people mean fewer harm comes to good or innocent people, but that can be achieved by the repentance of the bad people...something neither of these miscreants ever speak to.  

But who are the real brutalizers?  After responding that it was actually those two who "thrill" to human suffering based on their ideological choices and agenda, Dan deleted my comment, because only he and feo can accuse conservatives and actual Christians of "thrilling" to see brutality occur.  So who are the real brutalizers?  Let's see all the ways these two "thrill" to see people die:

1.  Obviously, their support for Politicians & Policies (P&Ps) who push for pro-abortion legislation clearly demonstrates a tolerance for what is the most blatant and heinous form of brutality against the most innocent, vulnerable and defenseless people.  They're certainly "thrilled" that women...who themselves are harmed in a variety of ways to various degrees...can murder their own children without legal consequences.  There are approximately 800,000 surgical abortions every year.  There were over 900K in 2020, depending on one's source.  How many were achieved via "morning after pills" or the routinely taken birth control pills is impossible to know with certainty, but we can easily say a total of a million children were snuffed in utero every year for quite a few years.

What's more, abortions lead to miscarriages later, difficulty in conceiving at all and again, a variety of harm of varying severity to women who have them.  

2.  These two "thrill" to see black people murdered by black people.  Their support for P&Ps who push for relaxed law enforcement, cashless bail, defunding of police departments, outlawing effective law enforcement techniques, DAs and prosecutors who don't prosecute repeat criminals to the extent the law allows...These and other policies lead to a criminal element which has run wild, driving businesses to close and move out of town because of organized gangs of punks cleaning out stores, attacking people leaving work and a host of other forms of criminal behaviors.  Of course, it isn't only black people committing violent crimes, but as these two lament that anyone would dare pretend racism is to blame for the arrest and incarceration rates of black people ignore the realities of criminal behaviors and thus enable more of it.  While they're "down with the cause" in their fake posturing as champions for "justice", black people are suffering.  They're part of the problem offering no legitimate solutions.

3.  As with point #2, these two "thrill" to see not only Israeli citizens, but those who call themselves "palestinians" die constantly because they refuse to support Israel's right to defend herself against the muslims who seek their total annihilation.  If Israel responds to murderous attacks by the followers of the religion of hate and murder world domination, they're accused of "war crimes".  But self defense isn't a crime anywhere in the world, except in the hate filled minds of the modern progressive who constantly assaults reason with stupid positions like "Israeli war crimes".  Has Israel committed any war crimes?  Possibly, but neither of these shallow asshats could provide a case where it's been proven.  I could probably find one before they could because I'm objective in my response to news of that region of the world.  They simply pretend they have a clue because all the other modern progressives say the same stupid shit.   Hamas is just one manifestation of the rampant Jew-hatred in the world, and these two "thrill" at their suffering.

4.  In a recent discussion with Dan, one could see that he has redefined both "refugee" to mean any reason one wishes to illegally cross our southern border, and "invasion" to mean anyone other than those who illegally cross our southern border.  While these two morons pretend immigration and border policies which have long been established, as well as those implemented by President Trump...a far better human being than either of these two Christ-mockers...are somehow "unjust" (another word Dan routinely perverts), they're criticism of those policies has led to so much suffering and death
to which they both clearly "thrill". 

These four points alone clearly expose Dan and his troll as the true "brutalizers" who "thrill" at the human suffering they pretend is on conservatives, conservative Christians (also known as "actual" Christians), the GOP and the hated Donald Trump.  But the fact is, that suffering and more is the result of leftist policies and the politicians and activists who promote and/or enact them.   When the left pushes idiocy and the consequences manifest, they simply point at the other side as the cause. 

ATTN: NEW RULE FOR COMMENT SUBMISSION! 1/4/24

It's hard enough dealing with modern progressive visitors who identify themselves in some way.  One doesn't expect much in the way of intellectual thought, honesty or factual evidence supporting a premise from such.  But recent events have compelled me to raise expectations for visitors who wish to comment.

I would prefer that all visitors have some way to allow for direct contact, most commonly via email.  That would be nice.  I correspond with several visitors in this manner (mostly center-right visitors, because what could I possibly have to say to the lefties I would feel necessary to keep private?), but I don't feel it need be a requirement if one doesn't wish to provide in that way.  

More important than that would be for a visitor to have an actual blog of his/her own as a means of verifying I'm dealing with a person who isn't just a troll.  One person has posted as if he is Dan Trabue.  While I have no particular concern for Dan being victimized in a virtual way, I don't particularly like for anyone to do so here.  Dan's a contemptible putz, but he has a sovereign right to his own name.  And while some of us use pen names, he isn't one of them and one who poses as someone else entirely is a coward of extremely low character.   Conservatives are most likely to post under an assumed name because modern progressives are most likely to personally attack conservatives who use their true names.  Frank Turek is but one example.  No lefty is going to lose their livelihoods by using their real name here and I would support any lawsuits by a lefty who suffers that from any conservative visitor here (an easy promise given that possibility is next to zero).  Having one's own blog to which their name is a link would at least suggest a person of some degree of honor, though that bar is low.

So the rule, which doesn't require anything more than a pair, is to always submit a comment with the same name.  That name can't be "anonymous".  If one wishes to call one's self "Dumbass" and always does, such a person will be treated as would anyone else, unless it is determined one is hiding behind such a moniker in order to simply insult, threaten or spew nonsense. 

I don't like denying anyone from submitting a comment.  To date, feo is the only one who has proven to be unworthy of free access.  Others, like Dan or Vinny, while frustrating in their unjustified condescension, falsehoods, corruptions and whining, obviously are still able to submit comments and their willingness to do so under the same name...their own, in fact...is part of why that is.  

In addition, and with recent trolls in mind, have something to say and a reason for saying it that which can be discussed if anyone cares to do so.  Drive-by bullshit (spewed nonsense) won't be published. 

UPDATE---ADDITIONAL RULE:

Conversations can often go astray...going off on tangents organically and without intent.  That's fine.  It happens.  I don't have a big problem with it except when a particular topic is one about which I'm keen to discuss.  But what really chaps my ass is when some troll decides to spew on a topic with absolutely no relation to the post's topic, as we see so often with feo (not here so much since his sorry ass is unwelcome due to his history of bad behaviors), and now with this atheist dude one can see in the comments section following this post.  This post is not about the truth of God's existence.  I see no sane reason why some asshat would choose to puke his desperate atheist hopes here as if this post is dealing with that issue.   It comes with the first comment of these pathetic miscreants, as if he's simply adding his opinion to ongoing conversation which in truth exists only in his own fevered imaginings.  I will not entertain such attempts.  Such attempts will not be published.

 I will, however, allow someone to submit an invitation to visit another blog to address whatever the trolling individual would like to discuss.  Such a person can then take the chance that no one gives a flying rat's ass about what he/she would like to discuss, or enjoy the company of those who would.  

 This is MY blog.  Only I determine the issue to be discussed.   Get your own fucking blog.          

Hard Not To Cower In Dread

Out with the old and in with the new.  Recapping 2023 has been done by many.  I'm concerned about 2024.  I'm not particularly hopeful as we have one more year of the current DumbAss In Chief.  I'm still amazed anyone was so stupid as to insist he was the better choice in 2020.  But then, the left is mostly incredibly stupid people.  As I've stated many times before...because it's been the obvious truth for many decades...Joe Biden is an absolute moron of a man.  We now see just how corrupt he is.  And what we're seeing is a level of corruption the stupid assigned to Trump, who doesn't come close if he's corrupt at all.  

I'm not saying Trump is an angel, because I never did say or suggest anything so absurd.  His corruption, however, is not of a form or level which was malevolent in terms of harming the nation.  Assholes continue to regard him as "an existential threat to our democracy".  What a f**king laugh!  Only an asshole COULD say something so stupid and pretend it's true.  Thus, it's stupid AS WELL AS a lie!  But that's the left for 'ya!

So now we're heading toward Nov 2024 and the evil ones will pull out all the stops to prevent any possibility of a reversal of all our current president has inflicted upon the nation Trump was leading toward a return to greatness.  Assuming he's not convicted of any of the many fake indictments against him, he's pretty much a lock to be the GOP candidate for president.  And while I'm prepared to vote for whomever the GOP nominee is rather than suffer another four years of Biden or whomever the Dem assholes manage to run instead, I've come to believe Trump is again just what this nation needs.  Yet, I know there are still those who say they can't vote for him.  They'll use each of the moronic bullshit excuses...too old...too crude..."I can't in good conscience serve the Lord by voting for Trump"...and other such nonsensical excuses.  The dude was effective in a beneficial way, despite a few failings.  I believe he'll be even better, though one never knows for certain.  (Very hard to dismiss polls which are so overwhelming in his favor.)  I don't believe he'll be worse and certainly can't be worse than any of the Dem possibilities.  What a collection of clowns!

My worry is the time remaining between now and Nov, and then Inauguration Day.  If Trump's our guy, then my worries will be abated for the most part.  If not, then we're screwed.  But until November, Biden can cause so much more damage.  It's like his super power, if being a total ClusterF**k was a super power.  And there's certainly plenty of time for him to cause more damage.  Just heard that the total amount of illegals allowed unfettered access and undeserved generosity of taxpayer dollars is around 8 million.  This includes 1.7 million KNOWN "gottaways".  Over three hundred thousand migrant invaders in December 2023 alone!  This is madness and stupid people invited this and many other forms of suicidal consequences.  The steal could not have happened if fewer morons rejected the bullshit that Trump was a failure of a president, after doing so much better than a documented failure before and after him.  

So as much as I'm happy 2023 is over, there's no way we can sit back and think things will better in 2024.  That would take a SCOTUS with spine, and for the few good people in the GOP to get pissed enough to make more noise.  There's so much to rectify and those who continue to falsely malign good people have no intention of letting up with their evil agenda.  

May God have mercy on us and give us strength to confront the evil of the Democrat/marxist/modern progressive hellspawn and the wisdom to do it in a way which protects us from serious detrimental consequences.