Dems, Leftists, "Progressives"...All Morons

 https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2022/06/30/celebrities-wildest-reactions-scotus-rejection-roe-v-wade

The above link contains a sampling of leftist response to a very Constitutional correction to the unConstitutional Roe v Wade ruling of 1973.  This decision was well known to what used to be semi-moronic lefties..."semi" compared to today's lefties, anway...of all degrees of intelligence and education horrible law.  The ruling by the Supreme Court  last Friday overturning Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood, was no more than correcting that bad ruling from 50 years ago...a ruling which shouldn't have taken 50 years to correct.  

The link begins with foreigner James Corden exposing his ignorance of how the government of his new home operates.  He explains that it would take over 300 MPs to overturn the law which legally allowed abortions to take place in the UK.  He compares this with the six competent, intelligent justices of our Supreme Court who simply did their job and correctly acted in overturning a bad ruling.  He wants to believe these six stalwarts of reason made a decision for the entire United States.  They didn't.  The people who thankfully and righteously elected Donald Trump over a hag who would have further eroded our nation's greatness as Obama did and Biden now does.  The people elected Trump partly due to his promise of appointing Constitutionally sound jurists to the SCOTUS.  And because he came through on that promise...as he did so many others...the PEOPLE of the United States got what they wanted.  Not all the people, of course, and now morons are irate.  What's more, as this ruling returns to the states their authority to each decide for themselves if they wish to continue murdering innocent people, the people of each state will again decide...far, far more people than those 300+ Members of Parliament in the UK.

The rest of the examples are every bit as moronic and demonstrative of either a lack of knowledge about how our government works, abortion itself, or are lying like lefties like to do.  We hear the same nonsense about "women's reproductive choice" despite the fact that when a woman seeks an abortion, she's clearly already "reproduced".  The moronic "guns have more rights than women", the "my body, my choice to murder another body which isn't mine" whine, the "what about Loving v Virginia ruling?" stupidity...all the greatest hits of moronic thinking and dishonest bloviation. 

What the piece leaves out are all the responses by violent leftist assholes whose violence shouldn't be a surprise from the very people who visit the most barbaric violence against the most innocent and defenseless of our kind.  Their rioting and threats to protect their "right" to murder is simply their character showing.  They're just more willing to express it in no uncertain terms.  It's their Democrat Death Cult nature.  And from the morons who complain the center-right portion of America is destroying our democracy, the prove just who it is who cares least about it.  

Double Standard Dan

At Dan's Blog of Bullshit, he likes to put strict rules on conservatives and any who present true Christianity.  Anything which strays from those rules (and by "strict", I mean, rules strictly stifling opposing positions on every shifting grounds) is deleted.  A current trope of his is "stupidly false and unsupported claims" usually directed toward claims which have been supported beyond his ability to rebut in past post threads. 

Yet, when it comes to Dan's behavior, he doesn't in the least abide the rules he imposes on his betters either at his blog, or more egregiously, at the blogs of others.  What follows was a comment he tried to post to the last thread after my request that he refrain from posting any further comments not related to the topic of the post.  I believe it was, in the first place, he who took that discussion on the tangent to which I wished to put an end.  Don't hold me to it, as I didn't check to verify.  But I do know in my own posts on my own blog I tend to stick to the subject, because...well...that's why I wrote the post...to present and/or discuss that specific topic.

But Dan's dismissal of my request...which would have earned me another deletion had I behaved the same way at his Blog of Bullshit (the Bullshit Blog!)...compelled me to post it here to address his list of lies inherent in his platitude filled response to Glenn.  To wit:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Glenn... "Real tolerance from perverts, eh?" Y'all are such incredible snowflakes. You compare expecting businesses to not discriminate is a lack of tolerance, but telling women what medical choices they can and can't make, telling LGBTQ folk who they can and can't marry, telling parents and children who they can and can't listen to telling stories, THREATENING VIOLENCE to Drag Queens for reading stories, kicking LGBTQ people out of your families and churches, that's just making room for "your rights..."? You're confusing having your own liberties with deciding for OTHERS what they can and can't do and threatening jail and violence if they dare to disagree with your religious bigotry? Theo-Fascists! Open your eyes. This is just a great evil on your part. Stop it. You make your decisions, we'll make ours."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's begin:

""Real tolerance from perverts, eh?" Y'all are such incredible snowflakes."

 Given the whining by the left when their bullshit complaints fail to receive complete support by better people, it's amazing "progressives" ("progs") dare suggest that legitimate complaints about true misbehavior indicates the complainant is a "snowflake".  So look how actual snowflakes pervert reality:

"You compare expecting businesses to not discriminate is a lack of tolerance.."

Uh...yeah.  And in a most hypocritical way, given he's refusing to let businesses make their decisions while insisting we all should let his kind make theirs.  But this isn't the type of discrimination liars like him and those he enables assert it is.  The businesses in question, as has been confirmed over and over, aren't denying service to his kind.  In many of them, the person's peculiarities aren't at all unknown to the merchant.  But that person is requesting what the merchant won't provide for anyone regardless of what the person is.  And rather than simply go to where they can get what they seek, Dan favors forcing them to abide the whims of those he defends without the least bit of tolerance for the positions and beliefs of the merchants.  And to make matters worse, his kind will make the absolutely false comparison to race/gender/ethnic discrimination.  An intentional lie.

"...telling women what medical choices they can and can't make"

We would demand of anyone they can't murder their own children, whether father or mother.  No true Christian would do otherwise.  No non-Christian person of similar honor, morality and virtuous character would do otherwise.  We also aren't in the habit of pretending a procedure which has no purpose other than to accomplish that can honestly be described as a "medical" choice.  It is not.  There is no illness or threat to the mother in 99% of the cases which result in the child being murdered.  Dan and his kind exploit that remaining 1%, which themselves exploit cases of rape and incest, but at least are actually victims of those cases, to defend the 99% who simply murder for convenience...to abdicate their obligation to the child who exists by their direct invitation by virtue of having engaged in the very behavior designed for procreation.  Yeah...we see no problem "telling" women not to murder their own children, regardless of the child's age, size or location.  

And of course, though some of us see no legitimacy in any of the excuses provided for allowing abortion...be it rape, incest or a supposed threat to the life of the mother should abortion not be provided...we are willing to make the trade-off.  Victims of those three situations are granted the option to off their child, in exchange for the lives unjustly taken after the offering of all other superficial excuses...that other 99%.  One can see they don't care about that 1%, but are only exploiting them because they're scumbags.

"telling LGBTQ folk who they can and can't marry" 

Since the fallacious Lawrence v Texas ruling...every bit the crap sandwich the Obergefell and Roe rulings were...few could give a flying rat's ass if two perverts wished to live together pretending they're married.  Hell, they can even say it out loud.  What honorable people object to is having the definition of marriage perverted for their sake without any consent of the people.  In the only polls which are real representations of the people, 11 states voted overwhelmingly to block the implementation of SSM...an average of over 60% of those who voted.  After the "LGBTQ folk" realized the nation opposed the perversion of an institution long recognized as defined as the union of one man and one woman (this is when "legal precedent" has no value to progs), they sought an end-around through taking their whine to activist judges, until a SCOTUS majority imposed that abomination on the nation with the Obergefell ruling.  So it was never about who queers could "marry", or whether they were allowed to marry legally (they had been marrying throughout human history, as well as throughout American history).  It was always a battle for the true definition, and the queers couldn't win.  They needed to have it unConstitutionally imposed upon us.  After the SCOTUS overturned Roe, it's possible they'll at some point revisit the fallacious Obergefell decision and return that choice to the states as well.  I'm afraid the culture may be too far gone to see them do the right thing on this issue, but prayers and a really good president got us the anti-Roe ruling, so...

"...telling parents and children who they can and can't listen to telling stories..."

The lie here, of course, is twisted asshat men dressed as sluts reading to kids is no different than Grandma doing it.  That might be true if Grandma was trying to groom kids into pervs and queers, but normally Grandma's not doing anything of the kind (can't say the same for grandmothers Dan knows).  What Dan defends is no different than exposing little kids to pornography or any other adult themed sexual content.  Dan listed four books, and aside from two which have been around for a long time, the other two are standard for use by "gay" "parents" to read to the kids in their possession for the purpose of legitimizing their perversion.  This is the case with "Drag Queen Story Time".  It's not so much the actual books these cretins use, but how they're using it to groom kids into believing their perversion is just fine and dandy.  The data showing the harm to kids who've gone down that path...regardless of which letter of the queer agenda they choose to emulate...is well known, but totally ignored and dismissed by those who push perversion.  Honorable people are just in telling them to leave the kids alone.  Dan and his kind are child molesters by exposing little kids to their deviancy.

"...THREATENING VIOLENCE to Drag Queens for reading stories..."

Dan feigns outrage as evidenced by his putting the first two words in caps.  It's no different than being outraged at the thought of responding violently to child pornographers.  Dan wants to pretend this is an exaggeration...overstating the seriousness of the situation.  But as with the Father of Lies, evil is best inculcated gradually, with little things...like putting small amounts of arsenic in the coffee of one's spouse until the spouse eventually dies.  This describes how our culture became so decayed in the first place, and Dan and his kind continue with that agenda.  

Now, that's not to say that Dan even realizes what he's doing.  I can't confirm that, though I don't believe a word the guy says given all the lying he does.  But regardless of whether he knows he's doing it or rather that he himself is a victim of it doesn't matter.  It's what's happening and if pervs feel they're at risk of physical assault for grooming little kids...that's a good thing, and fewer little kids will be indoctrinated.

"...kicking LGBTQ people out of your families and churches..." 

This is one of Dan's favorites.  It suggests families and churches who cast out pervs at the first discovery of their perversion.  No honest people should buy it.  At best, no honest person should take a position based on this legend alone.  The reason is it's so incredibly one-sided and crafted to portray the queers as hapless victims of cruel and bigoted churches and families.  Again, I don't buy it and won't until any "LGBTQ" person who claims to be so victimized can be cross-examined by moral people and those they accuse can be welcomed to provide their side of the story.  It's an "innocent until proven guilty" sort of thing to which the progs are routinely unwilling to submit themselves.  No.  Just believe the accusation, because why would they lie or embellish?  Stupid question. 

"You're confusing having your own liberties with deciding for OTHERS what they can and can't do and threatening jail and violence if they dare to disagree with your religious bigotry?

No Dan.  You're purposely misrepresenting our position in order to portray us in the worst possible light.  It's what you do.  Lying is the only way to push your agenda, since honest and honorable people are actually devoted to things like truth, reason, morality, honor and compassion for others.  Otherwise we'd be moronic progs, too. 

Reasons To Be Cheerful

There have been two great SCOTUS decisions this week, with of course the one most worthy of celebration being the reversal of the Roe v Wade decision, returning to the states the authority to decide abortion law.  This is a ruling a long time in coming, indeed since Roe was so unconstitutionally decided back in '73.  It was based on the lie regarding privacy, the lie we don't know when life begins and the lie there is some difference between the born and unborn which negates constitutional protections against the taking of life about which we simply can't tell.

The wailing and caterwauling has begun as the poor, oppressed women seeking to murder their own children must now face the prospect their state may further restrict their ability to do so.  Some may even have to travel out of state in order to commit the heinous act, and that has also been promoted as some dire assault on women's rights, as if there won't be plenty of murderous leftists willing to provide transport.  (Of course, we're talking about lefties, so maybe they won't dig deeply to fund such transport after all.)

In time, we may see a reduction in abortions, or we may see an increase in the rate of reduction if it is indeed going down regardless.  Either way, a reduction is a good thing...for those targeted for death mostly...and I don't much care if it's because people are forced to face their obligations regarding the care of the child they invited into this world, or because the character of people is rising (doubtful these days).  All that matters is fewer innocent people being murdered by their parents.  

In the long run, fewer states allowing abortion as it now is will...it is my hope...result in a cultural regard for life increasing, or at least cultural contempt for abortion increasing.  Again, either way....

In any case, God bless those Justices who so ruled to reverse this travesty.

The other ruling concerns overturning a long-standing New York law prohibiting the carrying of firearms based on need determined by the state, not the citizen.  From the NYPost:

"Writing for the 6-3 majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said Thursday that the law’s requirement of New Yorkers who want a permit to carry a handgun in public to show “proper cause” that the weapon is ​specifically needed for self-defense “violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms in public.”"

It's absurd to think one's life must remain at risk until some government entity sees fit to allow one the ability to protect one's self.  This ruling will affect other states who have similar restrictions against the right to defend one's self and will mean more people will be carrying and willing to step up the next time some punk decides to shoot up the place.

In any case, God bless those Justices who so ruled to reverse this travesty.

ADDENDUM:  In yet another righteous manifestation of true American justice, we have this:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-supreme-court-affirms-religious-liberty-rules-in-favor-of-public-high-school-football-coach-punished-for-praying-after-games

Dem Immorality---A Mere Taste

While I will often cite articles from elsewhere to provide context or support for a point or position I present, I don't think I've used one for the text of any post.  But what follows is about as accurate and assessment of the Democrat Party and "progressivism" as one could hope to find.   I'm especially pleased to have found it at AmericanThinker.com given recent disparaging comments about such sites by one who hasn't better to provide better insights into current events and the culture in general.  Soon I hope to do a post on the cruel joke we call the current president of the United States of America.  The same tone as what I've had in mind for that post is present in this link.  It's a tone which is the result of the reality we suffer today:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/06/the_democrats_vs_morality.html

Well! THIS Is Interesting!!

 https://www.theblaze.com/news/democratic-louisville-mayor-gets-punched

I would really, really love to hear what this black voice has to say about why he labeled the mayor!

This is ALSO quite interesting  (I hope it plays):

https://apis.mail.aol.com/ws/v3/mailboxes/@.id==VjN-_7epgfdpgK_tOhs0I4PA7nzc3R2ofSi-m7mgtKIUYcp2FMZULh_sSwzAAihOEAug-OZtZrw2rULBXQ-scIJXZQ/messages/@.id==AIOjRaF8dejKYrI-mgu4AD_syGs/content/parts/@.id==2/refresh?appid=aolwebmail&ymreqid=711089d7-b5ae-2713-302c-5a001b016f00

Stolen? Absolutely!

 I don't have a lot of time, so how this post turns out may not be as pretty as my usual offerings.  But bullshit by lefties requires some clarification...not that doing so will end the bullshit, but at least I'll feel I've done more to counter it.

With this clown show of a hearing put on by the execrable and lying Nancy Pelosi, we can't help but recall the many and varied allegations of election fraud and irregularity which led to the presidency being stolen from a beneficial to the nation effective president in favor of a total failure who in fifty years of service in Congress hasn't accomplished a damned thing but to enrich himself.  Setting aside the fools who would chose not to vote for Trump in 2020, the totally moronic assholes who actually believed Joe Biden to be an improvement is an indictment on the nation as a whole.  How could we have come to a place where so many actually believed that to be true?  There was never any evidence the guy was intelligent, honest, capable or in any way worthy of one's vote for anything, say nothing of being worthy of the presidency.  And his performance from the jump and everything since has been a litany of proofs of the incredible stupidity of any who thought he'd make things better than they were, which was vastly better than they were prior to Jan 2017 and so far beyond what this dunce of a dumbass has done to our nation.  And keep in mind, I'm speaking only of those who thought he was going to make things better, not those who may have voted for him out of hatred for Trump.  That's an irrational issue for another time, as I can't get over how stupid those people were. 

Anyway, this isn't really about that, either.  This is about election fraud and what I mean when I use the term.  Thus, no one should believe themselves welcome to bring around their own definitions.  What follows is a description of what it means in the context of the 2020 elections. 

The previous post dealt a bit with the lame attempts to pretend there was actual arguing in court to determine the merit of a given claim of fraud.  There was very little of it, and most of it resulted in rulings in Trump's or the GOP's favor.  What remained were cases not actually adjudicated and while I'm supposed to take seriously attempts to present evidence to that effect, it has been woefully absent any reference to specific claims and how they may have been deemed without merit.  As I've said, it is a trial or hearing situation wherein one proves a case or has it proven without merit, not in the attempt to have an allegation heard.  In the previous post, I provided a link to a John Lott piece which provided an example of what the GOP and Trump campaign was up against in getting their claims heard and adjudicated.  It accounted for a considerable number of claims.

But here's the thing:  When we talk about election fraud, particularly and specifically regarding the 2020 debacle (a debacle due to how it turned out and what it meant for the United States), it's more than just the typical Democrat stable of dead people voting.  And it doesn't require a nationwide organization of Dem scumbags fanning out to vote twice or under fraudulent names.  Those are just two of the many ways the election was stolen. 

No.  There was no need for such organizing.  All that was needed was the fact that so many stupid people in so many different areas of life were personally committed to seeing Trump lose.  That is, not seeing Biden win, but seeing Trump lose.  That is, the derangement of Trump-haters of all parties, of all walks of American life acted on their own individual selves in service to that goal...sometimes like lone wolves and other times in concert with others.   So in addition to all the perennial voter fraud favorites for which the Dem Party is so historically notorious, we had brand new methods of perverting the electoral process to favor one party (the jackass party) over the other (Trump World).  Let's count the ways:

The Covid-19 situation provided an excellent opportunity for Democrats.  Despite Trump's many great efforts to address it as time went on....inhibiting travel to/from China, working with industry to retool their factories to churn out more needed medical equipment and PPEs, "Operation Warp Speed", moving hospital ships and setting up additional medical facilities only to see most of it go unused, encouraging the investigating of prophylactic treatments, etc., Dems exploited the situation in a number of ways...the first of which was to pretend Trump wasn't getting things done on behalf of the American people struggling with the many unknowns of the illness.  This portrayal of Trump "incompetence" was repeated constantly by Dem politicians, leftists in media as well as the ignorant, hateful and TDS sufferers among the leftist voters.  Add this to the many false accusations against Trump leveled at him since he first threw his hat into the presidential campaign ring, and those who were being conditioned to reject Trump by such falsehoods were now fed even more of it.

As the election season drew close enough for voting to begin, various states ignored the election laws of their respective states on the pretense voting in person was a clear and present danger due to Covid.  After suppressing information regarding the truly at risk, as well as the means to protect one's self from infection, this played well among the electorate, and mail-in became widespread.  Voters were assured that this form of voting would be safe and secure, despite the fact fraud is far more likely and harder to detect.  (It is said that in the European Union, 63% have put a ban on mailing in ballots except for citizens living overseas. Another 22% have imposed a ban even for those overseas. And most of those that allow mail-in ballots require some form of photo ID to get one.)  Ballot harvesting became common place and unsecured drop-boxes appeared in many locations, which ultimately were stuffed by Dems.

Then there's the leftist media, particularly of the Big Tech social variety, who in the most partisan manner possible, blocked stories and information beneficial to the Trump campaign, while at the same time blocking anything which was unfavorable for Dems, specifically Biden.  The most notable among these is the case of the Hunter Biden laptop.  It is said that had this information not be squelched so that so many people were unaware of it, as many as 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for Old Joe had they know of it.  Even if that 17% simply chosen not to vote at all, it would have been more than enough to result in a Trump win.  And since Dan loves experts, I present Dr. Robert Epstein:

https://www.israelunwired.com/hillary-clinton-supporter-testifies-about-massive-big-tech-election-meddling/

Epstein's testimony warns of just how manipulative the social media honchos are and that for them to be more aggressive with their methods than they were in the 2018 midterms is not even a question of "if", but "how badly".  His estimates, even if half, would've made, and thus likely made a significant difference in the outcome of the 2020 election.

We now have a number of sources which detail how the 2020 election was stolen from Trump on behalf of Trump-haters across the United States of America, such as Mollie Hemingways' Rigged:  How the Media, Big Tech and the Democrats Seized Our Elections, Dinesh D'Souza's 2000 Mules and of course, the New York Times' own shenanigans as described here:

https://nypost.com/2021/05/08/how-the-new-york-times-publishes-lies-to-serve-a-biased-narrative/

https://steadfastclash.com/the-latest/new-york-times-writer-brags-about-destroying-thousands-of-trump-ballots/ 

As can be seen by this limited list of examples, there was various means by which this election was stolen from Trump.  And really, this just scratches the surface.  Morons and liars insist the election was pure and honest.  Those words should never be used in any discussion regarding how this election went down. 

Oh Look!! A Kangaroo!!

So the Soviet-style show trial began today.   I didn't watch it.  I don't intend to watch it.  I'm pretty certain I can tell folks what they'll say and win most bets for accuracy.  These are not serious people in this so-called "committee".  They are not seeking truth.  This is just a continuation of what they began from the moment Trump came down that escalator to announce his candidacy for POTUS.  They lied about it being an insurrection.  When has there ever been an insurrection without firearms?  Can't recall any.  Of course, we can regard their behavior since Trump threw his hat into the ring, but "coup" is a more appropriate appellation for what the lying leftists of the Democrat party have been doing. 

It's amazing...though it shouldn't be given the character of the left...how they were keen on defending the rights of morons to burn, loot and murder for most of the summer of 2020, including direct assaults on government buildings, law enforcement vehicles and of course personnel and dare to label that as some sort of Constitutionally protected right, while pretend a few hundred agitated voters getting out of hand at the Capitol is worth this kind of waste of government money.  These rat bastards should be doing the people's business and we are in no way served by this charade.  

The saddest part...at least so far...there's no telling how far these weasels will go to hang Trump or his people...is my fear that it's not enough to be the last straw for any who would normally NOT vote GOP.  Indeed, this whole thing is the result of all those who refused to vote for Trump in the last election.  This bullshit hearing may be enough to distract the incredibly stupid from keeping in mind just how badly the country was harmed by allowing Biden to take the White House. 

It's grating to hear a moron like Dan pretend modern OR traditional conservatism (not much difference between the two that a fool like Dan is capable of pointing out) is a threat to the nation given what we have suffered since Biden was sworn in.  From my engagement with fools on the internet, there are a lot of Dans out there.  That's a serious problem for this nation, its culture and of course its people.  For those idiots, it's as if they have a death wish. 

And now the brain-cell free people they supported are again proving their incompetence and their deceit and their evil intent.  Given how all attempts to date intended to destroy Trump have failed, it's a safe bet these shit-for-brains Dems will fail yet again with his incredible waste of time and money.  They could drop the whole thing, release all those who did next to nothing but stand in or near the capitol and the consequences would not at all involve any negative consequences to anyone, except for when the GOP regains power in Congress come November.  But that's going to happen anyway. 

Here's what the truth is:  there was no insurrection.  There was a dust-up by pissed off people who got out of hand.  Nothing was burned.  Destruction was minimal, and the only people really hurt were the pissed off people.  The lies of the left can't change that.  They can only influence the stupid who put them in power in the first place and did so by cheating, fraud and abuses of power.  Should they prevail, those things will only worsen.  It's the only way they can attain, regain and/or maintain power.

Path To Perdition Month

I wasn't going to do a "Pride Month" post this year.  But then, it seems always to be a good idea to speak out against such a perverse notion as celebrating how perverts prefer to have sex.  Oh, I know...it's about being "gay" and unashamed.  But that's like being a liar and unashamed and we don't see Dan promoting a "Lying Ass Pride Month".  He'd probably bore us with tales of liars being "historically oppressed", as if that's any reason to support liars.

Clearly in the same way, there's no reason to promote pride in perversion.  It really doesn't matter how "historically oppressed" "LGBT-ers" have been.  For those of us who truly believe in equal rights for all humans, that's never been ignored as if meaningless.  But to whatever degree they've indeed been oppressed, that oppression is the consequence of their choice to indulge that which they falsely claim is beyond their ability to transcend...which doesn't seem like something in which to take pride.  "I can't change how badly I want to take stuff which doesn't belong to me, but I'm damned proud to be a thief!" 

Oh, wait!  I'm not supposed to compare the plight of the blessed pervs with others like thieves and liars because they've decided because they're compelled to whatever deviancy they fancy, then by golly it is indeed blessed!!  ...because we say so!!! ...and Dan agrees!!

Over there at Dan's blog of lies, he dared to make a parallel to Pentecost.  Good gosh there's no limit to his sacrilegious blatherings. 

As to "historical oppression", we're told by the disturbed Dan about LGBT-ers being kicked out of homes, churches and jobs as well as by tales of beatings, killings and not finding bras that fit.  (OK.  I made up that last bit.)  But here's the thing which they and their enablers don't get.  While we who strive to be of better character do not abide beatings and killings of even the sexually immoral and disordered, allowing them to remain among us while they promote their vile cause is forcing us to be enablers, and that we WON'T abide.  We don't tolerate such open rebellion, we won't champion it like "progressive" "Christians" do, because both God and science opposes their claims. 

And to this day, I've yet to hear any testimonies from any of those horrid parents, pastors/congregations or employers who exiled the LGBT person from their presence.  Not a single testimony.  All we hear are tales of being cast out and we're to accept the tale of woe from those who insist on indulging their disordered compulsions; that they were treated badly while just trying to be themselves, boo-hoo.  

Well, until I hear from any of those parents, pastors/congregations or employers, I don't want to hear about the whining.  I don't really care.

At the same time, we DO hear both sides when the "Gaystapo" oppresses businesses with their fascistic demands.  And what we hear are tales of assholes who aren't concerned with the concerns of people of faith and virtue who do not wish to associate with the sexually disordered and immoral.  Where do they get off?  It's clear they lied when they claimed they only wanted to be left alone to live their sordid lives as they saw fit in the privacy of their own dens of iniquity.  No.  They intend to destroy the culture and they've succeeded quite well with the aiding and abetting of those who should know better, likely do, but don't care enough about faith and virtue to stand against their bullshit claims of discrimination.

Pride In Perversion Month.  Pride In Spitting In God's Face Month.  Pride In Corrupting Children Month.  Who else takes pride in such things but the perverse and disordered?

Typical Leftist Hypocrisy

"One more time: Can you acknowledge how very evil it is to talk of putting a political enemy on trial when he's committed no crimes??" ---April 28, 2022 at 3:17 PM

The above was directed to me in a recent post at Dan's blog.  My initial response was in the negative.  Of course.  What could possibly make even a moron believe I would be in favor of such a thing, except for the person asking being a moron?  It didn't occur to me at the time, but this very moron voted for the party who does just that and has done that over and over again.

Two impeachment trials for a president who did nothing to warrant such a thing.

Several members of Trump's administration indicted for nothing of any consequence whatsoever, beginning with Michael Flynn.

Several hundred people still awaiting some form of legal action while cooling their heels in a Washington jail over the "insurrection" federal law enforcement said wasn't an insurrection. 

And just this week, Peter Navarro arrested for refusing to respond to a Congressional subpoena citing executive privilege.

The left has no problem arresting and trying political opponents.  It's what they do.  They do it all the time and is one of many reasons we're all the worse off because of all those who refused to vote for Trump in the last election.  Everyone of them have greatly harmed the nation and this is merely one of so many ways.  Morons every one.