Enemy Action III

 This is a short post, the purpose of which is to point out the lack of reports of police "brutality" against white people.  We know the stats prove there are more white people killed by cops, the argument only being one of proportion with regard to percentage of population.  But regardless of that lame angle played by the lying left...in this case the media, not just people like Dan...one would think that for the sake of objectivity and to prove one's news organization is balanced in their reporting, we'd see something regarding incidents where white suspects or detainees are shot by cops.  

 But no.  We only see story after story of black people being "victimized" by cops as if it never ever happens to anyone else.  That's intentional.  That's the media pushing the leftist, race-hustling narrative.

Of course we're never treated to violent protests of any kind by the families and friends of all those many more whites killed by cops.  Grace-embracers might argue it's because whites haven't been oppressed for 250 years in this country...as if that freakin' matters in any case with which we've been inundated in the past five years or more.  If one is truly concerned about out of control law enforcement, what difference would that make anyhow and why only provide examples of black people victimized by it?  

The answer is clear and obvious.  It's because the left and their media shills aren't at all concerned about ANY victims of police misconduct.  They're only concerned with appeasing the radical marxists behind the "racist cop" narrative and the ultimate goal of taking money from those who have it and giving it to those who aren't interested in engaging in wealth building activity and the effort it takes to be successful...after taking their cut, of course. 

So it's a lie of omission as well as a lie of misdirection every time you see another story of cops killing black suspects, while never seeing any involving white suspects.  This distortion of reality results in a distortion of perception by the general public, particularly those who don't or won't take the time to look beyond the headlines.  The leftist media counts on these sheep.  It's intentional and more proof that the leftist media is indeed the enemy of the people. 

Conned!!

 I just have to take a moment to seek understanding.  I'm told that I've been conned by Trump, though I'm not exactly certain how.  Now, those supporting BLM are now faced with the curious revelation that its marxist founder has purchased four properties totally over $3 million?  Who knew marxism could be so profitable?  In the meantime, how many have been lifted out of poverty and despair by the millions of dollars taken in by the organization? 

Seems their donors have been taken in!

Enemy Action II

 Rather than add this to the previous post, where it is more likely to be overlooked, I decided to put the following in its own post, and perhaps add to it should another example come to light:

https://amgreatness.com/2021/04/05/media-politicians-still-spreading-the-big-lie-about-officer-sicknick/

In it, we see that the media is just too damned invested in making sure everyone believes the riot at the Capitol last January 6 was on orders from the evil Donald Trump.  Thus, even when there is contradicting evidence regarding a false claim by the media, they insist on perpetrating that story nonetheless.  If they did nothing more than say the death of a Capitol cop, William F. Evans, by islamist Noah Green of Indiana was the "second death in the line of duty", that all by itself would be false reporting.  

 

Officer Sicknick, who died the day after the January 6 riot, has not been confirmed to have died of any reason related to that riot.  At first, the press ran with the false story he was beaten with a fire extinguisher, despite the duty of journalists to get the facts right before reporting anything. 

Then, they report he may have died from complications resulting from exposure to bear spray.  But that hasn't been at all confirmed, either.  Sicknick's family believes he simply died of a stroke, which despite possibly being the result of said exposure, it again hasn't been confirmed and shouldn't be publicized as anything more than a possibility. 

But it's just so important to make sure people believe it's all Trump's fault, so they'll continue to play this game of letting people believe what they'd like them to believe...because the leftist media is indeed the enemy of the people.  No responsible journalist or news source would do this the news consuming public...just because the journalist or news source doesn't like the president. 

In the meantime, why do we still not know the name of the cop who shot Ashli E. Babbitt?  Where's the leftist media's concern for her?  We knew Derrick Chauvin's name immediately. 

Enemy Action

 I wanted to do this post a few days ago when the info was fresher.  Then I let it go and changed my mind.  Then I saw something that changed my mind again, so here it is:

The title refers to the leftist media, A.K.A., the enemy of the people.  Except for the final example, I'm not going to bother with specific citations of which leftist source was guilty of the infractions I will present, except to say the last isn't a leftist source.  I'll deal with that when I get to it.

The first is how the trial of Officer Derek Chauvin for his allegedly being the reason massively high criminal suspect George Floyd died while in police custody.  Constant references to this trial refer to "the killing of George Floyd".  Note how I said "for his allegedly being the reason massively high criminal suspect George Floyd died".  Various news sources I've heard on radio and TV haven't used the word "allegedly" when referring to "the killing of George Floyd".  The reason journalists and their employers are supposed to use the word "allegedly" is to avoid tainting the trial and improperly influencing the jury.  Sure, the awarding of millions of dollars by the city to the "family" of Floyd...with no mention that I've seen regarding if any of those family members were actual dependents Floyd supported, like children, aging mother, etc....would surely carry such a risk of influence and news sources were irresponsible in reporting that as well.  (For the moronic, this means that a jury might figure if the city would award anything to the Floyd family...whoever they are...it's as good as an admission that their cops were definitely guilty of causing his death.)

Here, I must add that I can't guarantee that I didn't also hear this lawsuit-worthy mistake uttered from a more right-wing source as well.  But that wouldn't mitigate the reality of leftist media malfeasance. 

The next example of irresponsible behavior was presented in a montage of clips from a variety of lefty sources...and politicians, as well...presented on a recent episode of Tucker Carlson's show.   In it, they were all lamenting the horror of the Georgia legislature in the passing of their recent election integrity bill.  Aside from the lie that it is intended to suppress the voting ability of minorities, one exceptionally pernicious lie being repeated by the above usual suspects is about providing drinking water for those waiting in line to vote.  The fact is that it does allow poll workers to hand out water.  There's nothing in the bill that prevents voters from bringing along their own water and even snacks.  All of these lefty liars could have easily studied the bill to find this out, yet they chose to pretend the GOP majority of the Georgia legislature is out to hurt people and deny their voting rights, comparing them to their very own Jim Crow brethren of years past.  It one of the most egregious examples of outright lying by news sources, and the politicians they support, that's come down the pike in...what time is it now?

Finally, this one is actually on Tucker Carlson in his show of a few nights ago referencing a CNN piece by one Devin Cole writing for its website, wherein he states:

"It's not possible to know a person's gender identity at birth, and there's no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth."  

Now, I was torn by how I regarded Carlson's reporting of this, as it is easy to mock the idiocy of such a statement, simply because one can easily tell the sex of a newborn without even having ever studied biology or human anatomy for a single second.  Then I wondered if the article was truly referring to that, Carlson was just going after low hanging fruit.  Not having any desire to look it up, I simply point to the statement itself to see two very obvious and moronic problems:

1.  The notion of gender identity is a fraud.  While I certainly understand that I'm a man, the concept of "identity" as a man is rather absurd.  It's just a given and obvious for the same reasons it's really easy to tell the sex of an infant.  The left gives credence to this fantasy ideology that one can actually be of the sex opposite of what one's biology clearly indicates one is.  The "transgender" activists like to think they'll get humanity to buy into this crap, but there's no legitimate reason anyone in the media must enable it and promote it as if true.  But the leftist media does, willingly.

2.  There is indeed "consensus" criteria for identifying the sex of a newborn, which is what the obstetrician does.  It's kind of his specialty, one might say.  The child's DNA has assigned to the child it's sex...or one might be better off saying the child's father assigned the sex via his personal donation of reproductive material during intercourse with the child's mother nine months prior. 

So point #2 is simply a matter of understanding what the CNN "journalist" means by assigning sex, though it's incredibly difficult to believe he's not simply parroting the propaganda of the LGBT activists and their enablers. 

Thus, we have three more very recent cases of the media misinforming the public, either purposely or through contemptible incompetence.  There's no excuse and the public suffers either way.  They are without a doubt enemies of the people.