What follows are comments I submitted at Dan's Blog Of Lies And Perversions under his post of Aug 9 (https://throughthesewoods.blogspot.com/2026/08/a-curse-to-fourth-generation.html). I don't know if he responded to them, or if he just did his typical deletion thing and then lied about what I said. I never scrolled down to the comments total to see if there's any change in that number one way or the other. When I finished submitting my comments, I just copied them to a file in anticipation of his eventual deletion of them (the probability of deletion is always extremely high, as it's easier for him than confronting that which he deletes), and now I've chosen to post them here. Refer to the link above to find out what nonsense provoked my response, or just pour through Craig's blog post and the subsequent comments there (https://jsmmds.blogspot.com/2026/08/monkey-see.html).
I should also mention an earlier post at Dan's Blog Of Lies And Perversions (https://throughthesewoods.blogspot.com/2026/06/happy-pride-to-beloved-community.html) which is referenced both at Craig's blog and Dan's linked post of pompous poop above. So here we go:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You start right off with lies and fasehoods:
"As always, I'm engaged with conversations with conservatives who believe the best of the white privileged male protesters on days of infamy like the January 6th uprising or nearly every Pride Parade,..."
First is another example of you self-loathing, white-guilted racism against white people, as every white dude who expresses an opposing opinion must be "privileged" to dare speak at all. There's not a person who is born of this nation who is not privileged, some more than others in various ways, but none so much that they deserve the arrogant condescension inherent of every instance whereby liars like you label them "privileged white guys". Worse is that you can't even, nor so much as make the slightest attempt, to connect their skin color to their expressed opinion, as if ONLY white people feel as do those you attack without just cause.
There was no "uprising" on January 6, but only the concerns of decent Americans who were treated badly for daring to express their concerns. Indeed, video evidence proves that from the start, the most vitriolic among them...few in number...were rebuked by those decent people (see Ray Epps, clips of people seeking to restrain the more destructive among them...also few in number), and it got out of hand after the Pelosi people began lobbing tear gas and flash bangs into peaceful crowds of marchers.
Those who protest at "Pride" events are more often than not peaceful in their protests against the participants, particularly given the often lurid behaviors of pro-LGBTQ participants. They almost never (I'm being generous here in suggesting they might ever) get violent with anyone.
"...and one thing that I believe these people are missing is the context of oppressor and oppressed."
Not at all. You just need to believe this. What's missing is the relevance of past oppression having any bearing on the expressed positions of those who disagree with your kind, as it has absolutely no relevance at all.
"In one recent conversation, the conservative posted a video where there was a white guy protesting against abortion rights and health rights for women. In that example, the white anti-abortionist (in THAT example) remained fairly calm and low-key."
Again with the racism! What possible difference does it make what race the protester is? Answer this question for a change!
The lie here is that he wasn't protesting against "abortion rights and health rights for women." He was protesting against the unnecessary murder of people in utero, as there is no medical reason for ever having to do that. He was advocating for life in ways you never do, and in this case, seek to suppress his most righteous message on the basis of the fictitious "right to abortion" and the equally fallacious "health rights for women".
What's more, he didn't "remain" "fairly calm and low-key". He came calm and had no reason to elevate his emotions because his cause is just and those attacking him have no argument rationalizing their doing so.
"In another example, I had offered the story of the interaction (cited in a previous recent post here) of the six white nationalist men protesting at this year's Louisville Gay Pride Day."
And no where in that previous post, nor in your pearl clutching comments at Craig's blog and not in this post either, have you offered any evidence that these six were "nationalists" in any way, but only that because they were white and righteously opposing those at the "Pride" event, they then must be.
"In one, we're talking about rights for women, in the other, we're talking about equal rights and opportunities for LGBTQ folks and their allies"
No. That's what you're trying to make them both to be. The reality is the promotion, defense, celebration and enabling of infanticide and sexual immorality.
"In each of those cases it is vital to remember that we are talking about
groups who have been historically abused,
oppressed,
maligned,
demonized,
harmed, and
killed
on the one hand and the oppressors on the other."
This is a lie. Again, you're trying to make it about that in order to abdicate your obligation to address that actual protests and objections to the things like the sexual immorality and infanticide you promote, celebrate, defend and enable.
"...if the oppressed and their allies were to get loud and yell, we must remember there is a historic memory of abuses towards women and denying the rights to women."
This is abjectly stupid and deceitful! Again, what relevance does past oppression have to the objections of those who protest against you privileged groups? And yes, those you defend are privileged. If you hit me with rocks last year, does that mean you're not allowed to deny me the ability to park my car on your lawn. Because you must remember there is a historic memory of abuses by you against me. How absurd you argument is! It's a dodge and nothing more.
"That makes it a charged situation for those on the side of the oppressed."
But of course, they're not even oppressed! You continue to assert that because some of them had been, then they must be accommodated in all things. That no one must ever oppose any demand for accommodation for even those things unrelated to having been oppressed.
"Trauma is a real thing caused by the real world history of abusive oppressors."
Any and every current "trauma" they experience/endure is totally self-inflicted.
"And in each of these cases, the oppression is not ancient history. It's still a fresh, recent thing, in our lifetimes only - and truly into our children's lifetimes - has it started to get a little bit better."
Yet, to whatever extent that's true at all, it's still wildly irrelevant. Public displays of celebration and lobbying by your "oppressed" people are demands for more privileges akin to the demand for reparations for slavery. There's no justification for it and past offenses aren't justifications. And it's not gotten "a little better"! It's gotten wildly insane and unjustified!
"If LGBTQ folks and their allies or women or others get their ire up and respond a bit frantically in the face of oppression rising back up, that's understandable."
No, it's not. But it is typical. Leftists always want to get violent when told their demands are the nonsense they are. And opposing their demands is not oppression at all, unless you can provide an example of any policy of oppression being proposed and in what way anyone would be truly "oppressed".
"We're talking about human rights and people are rightly, strongly and righteously emotionally defending human rights and warning against returning to days of oppression."
Another willful, intentionally told lie. It's not a matter of human rights at risk, nor about any "oppression" on the rise simply because your "oppressed" might not get yet another accommodation for which they are truly undeserving.
And the lies keep coming!
"In other words, even if the supporters of historic oppression remain relatively calm (and often, they don't), that's not to their credit. It doesn't win them any points."
Who are these "supporters of historic oppression" to whom you refer? You're now lying about those who oppose sexual immorality and infanticide as "supporters of historic oppression"??? What a slander! This is you demonizing better people again to defend those who aren't oppressed at all. What's more, those who oppose infanticide and sexual immorality aren't known for acting in any way other than calm. After all, they're typically not leftists/progressives!
"Picture Jesus pulling together a whip to drive out the money changers from the temple."
Another corruption of Scripture to defend immorality and murder! It's what we've come to expect from you. Here's a better analogy:
Imagine Jesus being crucified for preaching the Word of God against sexual immorality and infanticide. That's what YOU'RE doing by disparaging those who oppose what you celebrate, defend, enable and support. You're "crucifying" followers of Jesus who are defending and promoting HIS teachings. You're "martyring" His followers for the crime of telling the Truth. You seek to oppress them by lying about them and their message and intentions.
"Righteous burning active anger against oppression."
Another lie. It's UNrighteous burning anger against the truth and the fear that all others will wake up to it and accept it as the truth it is. Yet, none of that awakening seeks to oppress, but rather to end oppression...the oppression of sinful sexual desires and compulsions and more so, the oppression of the your kind against those in utero.
"God and reasonable people are rightfully outraged at oppression."
God has no truck with those you defend, celebrate, support and enable, nor with you for doing so. He and truly reasonable people are rightfully outraged at how badly your kind has brought moral decay to our culture.
"There was and continues to be active harm, ongoing harm caused by that oppression and it doesn't go away in a day."
None that you've ever identified, while at the same time you ignore true oppression, particularly the oppression of the unborn.
"Likewise the trauma experienced by all these other groups: women, LGBTQ folks, those with disabilities, immigrants."
Once again, you purposely place into your list those who do not belong...the disabled, as what they experience is not the result of anything unrelated to their disability. Women, "immigrants" (the lie that there's no distinguishing between those who come here according to our laws versus those who don't) and of course your beloved "LGBTQ" people. That's lying. It's like the fruit put on a list of vegetables with full knowledge it's not a vegetable.
"Those who would downplay the trauma from that oppression need to understand what they're asking when they're asking people to be calm in the face of oppression rising back up."
When you can identify specific examples of "oppression rising back up", that'll be the day. And yes, when decent and righteous people of character speak out against that what you falsely support as worthy of concern...speaking out against that which has no relation to any oppression, real or imagined....attacking them as "oppressors", "white privileged people" or worse, you expose yourself as the liar you are.
Now you'll delete some or all of my comments on the basis of your standard lies of disrespectful comments, when simply it's just because I shred your lies. You won't support your lies, or I would have addressed that support. Instead, you just lie, because that's how you roll.
No comments:
Post a Comment