I'm a little overwhelmed. There's so much going on in the news that it's hard for me to keep up. I'd like to comment on most everything I hear, see or read but there's just so much. Between other blogs I like to visit, news sources of various types and just people talking, it's hard for me to decide on which I'd like to comment without something else coming up before I put fingers to keyboard.
My series on the shamefulness of the shameless left is difficult given one single topic could provide fodder for a completely dedicated blog of its own to truly cover. I'm not sure I didn't bite off more than I could choose with that one. There's nothing of the left...the modern progressive...which isn't shameful and there's no end to the manifestations of their shamefulness. It's like they're competing with each other to determine which of them is the most shameful.
It could be just referencing all the stupid crap Dan Trabue says and supports. That alone could be a separate blog just responding to his moronic heresies of his fake Christianity, or his vile hatred of Donald Trump and the GOP or his laughable defense of various progressive narratives and initiatives.
The disaster of the Biden administration, put in power after a fraudulent election rife with fraud can all by itself provide fodder for a renewed "American Descent" type blog (God rest Eric Ashley's kind soul!). To think some people saw him as a panacea for the invented dangers of the Trump years is sheer insanity, given what an incompetent and waste of Congressional space that asshole has always been. And now we have absolutely unequivocal proof of what a stupid, moronic asinine and asshole notion it was to suspect we could ever be better off with this putz in office instead of the beneficially effective Trump modern progressive lying assholes demonize as a pox on our nation. Who could be more unfit for the presidency than Biden? Obama was unfit compared to Trump. BUSH was unfit compared to Trump.
Then we have this: Some Proud Boys guy named Biggs was given 17 years in prison for doing pretty much no harm of any kind on Jan 6, 2021 at the Capitol. Terrorist enhancements by a Trump appointed judge (Trump's picks for his world were among his few, but serious mistakes) were leveled on this poor guy when his worst move was shaking a fence. (Some reports suggest he helped to push one fence down. Even so...) "Terrorists" brought down the World Trade Center. They don't protest at school board meetings when their kids are exposed to filth and porn and homo crap. They don't pray at baby murder abortion mills hoping to persuade "mothers" to let their children live. They don't protest against the certification of potentially unlawful electoral ballots. They do burn cities over the lie that racist cops are targeting black people and have "murdered" black people who were actually thugs being combative during a legitimate and justified detainment. They do rob merchants in hoards in broad daylight.
Even among those who actually destroyed things at the Capitol, who actually laid hands on cops (who acted badly first...they or the cops), there are none who should be treated as enemies of the state when the real enemies are those who f**ked with the election from the very beginning.
Then there's the renewed calls for masking and "vaccinations" which someone pulled from their asses. There's the asshat green energy liars. There's the "trans" pervs and the worthless living on our streets, crapping on it, doing drugs and other vile things in front of kids and women.
What this all is the the consequence of modern progressive ideology...the true and present danger to our nation. How can I cover all the aspects...all the many manifestations of this abomination?
I'm aging fast. I'm far closer to the end than the beginning. I have daughters and granddaughters. What will become of them when I'm gone with these leftist assholes running free? I know family and friends who support all this shit. I'm willing to be forever estranged from every damned one of them in order to broach the subject in hopes of opening their eyes to the obvious they should already be seeing clearly. Should they decide to avoid me from that point, so be it. They hated Him first, so they will hate me as well for all the same and similar reasons.
People like Dan are reprobates. He's been given over to his corruption. I need to believe there are those who can be drawn to Truth, even it's only truth, for the lack of either is killing us. I'm ready now, anytime He wants to call me home. Until then, I intend to be a real pain in the ass because there's no being Mr. Nice Guy anymore if we're to push the needle to the light. Being nice won't get it done.
So what shall I post on next? What of the many crimes of the left will I highlight? Who will I piss off and what side of the divide will that person be?
I may take me some time before my next post in order to determine my direction. I may be forever retired now and I may be more active than merely blogging. I've much to think about in the coming months.
13 comments:
Then we have this: Some Proud Boys guy named Biggs was given 17 years in prison for doing pretty much no harm of any kind on Jan 6, 2021 at the Capitol. Terrorist enhancements by a Trump appointed judge (Trump's picks for his world were among his few, but serious mistakes) were leveled on this poor guy when his worst move was shaking a fence.
So we shouldn't prosecute him for trying to subvert the Constitution just because he didn't succeed? I suppose if the rioters had managed to catch and hang Mike Pence, you would excuse that too on the grounds that everyone had been so mean to Trump that his followers couldn't help but get carried away. Is there anything they could have done that you wouldn't excuse?
Even among those who actually destroyed things at the Capitol, who actually laid hands on cops (who acted badly first...they or the cops), there are none who should be treated as enemies of the state when the real enemies are those who f**ked with the election from the very beginning.
The only ones who tried to f**k with the election were Trump and his minions. I like the way you want to blame the cops for acting badly first. I guess the only people the cops ever mistreat are Trumpers. When a cop kills a Black man, it's always the Black man's fault.
They hated Him first, so they will hate me as well for all the same and similar reasons.
I love it when Trumpers compare themselves to Jesus.
Until then, I intend to be a real pain in the ass because there's no being Mr. Nice Guy anymore if we're to push the needle to the light. Being nice won't get it done.
And being a jackass will? The last three election cycles might suggest otherwise.
Like all your kind, you come here and spew nonsense. Let's review:
"So we shouldn't prosecute him for trying to subvert the Constitution just because he didn't succeed?"
How could he have succeeded at something he wasn't trying to do? I've seen no admission by anyone of his group that their intention was to "subvert the Constitution". That's just how you lying lefties spin (that is, LIE) the circumstances. The funny part (as in, egregiously dishonest and anti-American part) is how clearly your kind has ignored the Constitution with extreme prejudice. That's so particularly true regarding the entire Jan 6 Committee Hearings and the subsequent trials and convictions which resulted from that mockery of Congressional obligation.
"I suppose if the rioters had managed to catch and hang Mike Pence, you would excuse that too on the grounds that everyone had been so mean to Trump that his followers couldn't help but get carried away."
People said stupid things. What evidence was presented in hopes of proving anyone had any plan or intention to hang anyone? Was it that laughable scaffold someone slapped together which couldn't hold a puppy without falling over? The amazing part is that your kind says this shit with a straight face.
"Is there anything they could have done that you wouldn't excuse?"
Yes. Actual crimes.
"The only ones who tried to f**k with the election were Trump and his minions."
An absolute straight up lie from a lefty who chooses not to pay attention to all the facts. "Trump and his minions" have done nothing your asshole overlords haven't done in spades. See Trump's 2016 election, GW Bush's 2000 victory, and Brian Kemp's win over Stacey (I'm An Abject Moron) Abrams. More specifically, there were actual actions of election interference, irregularity and fraud in the 2020 and as president, is Constitutionally mandated to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". If Bill Barr, a one time chief law enforcement officer of the nation, did his job, Trump wouldn't be victimized by lying lefty assholes to the extent he is now.
"I like the way you want to blame the cops for acting badly first."
Thank you. I like to deal in facts. A very detailed chronological report, with video evidence time stamped to help the case, demonstrated how cops initiated a lot of the violent behavior by first lobbing smoke bombs and flash grenades on truly peaceful protesters (contrasted with the violent assholes your kind defended in previous years as they rioted over lies about racist cops) And actual, honest review of the events clearly suggest most of those at the Capitol were peaceful, and those who acted violently were either provoked by the DC cops or by agents provocateurs planted for the purpose (like Ray Epps).
"I guess the only people the cops ever mistreat are Trumpers."
The only people YOUR kind mistreats are "Trumpers", defenders of the unborn, opponents of CRT brainwashing and others who stand up for truth and righteousness.
"When a cop kills a Black man, it's always the Black man's fault."
Ahh...! That race card! I don't believe I've ever seen you play that card, Vinny. I shocked...a little bit anyway, given you are a leftist. What that black man is Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, George Floyd and the like, it has been the black man's fault. Do you lefties EVER deal in truth, reality and fact??? It seems the answer is an unequivocal "NO!"
"I love it when Trumpers compare themselves to Jesus."
I love it when lefties straight up lie about what is clearly intended. It was Jesus who asserted that we will be hated for doing what Jesus did, promoting and defending what He did, objecting to and opposing what He did. It's how I try to live my life and where I've succeeded, I get crap from asshats like you. Not at all a comparison of myself to Jesus, no matter how desperately you intend to assert otherwise. You know, and it pains me to acknowledge this, but your comments over the last year or so are not of the Vinny I once knew. It saddens me greatly to find you're not much different in your level of dishonesty as Dan and his troll. Has your life gotten hard these past few years? You used to actually challenge me.
"And being a jackass will? The last three election cycles might suggest otherwise."
There's no greater, more obvious jackass than a Democrat politician. The lies and unjustified arrogance which flows from them like a person suffering from terminal diarrhea after a severe drunk makes Trump's famous crudeness and inarticulate manner seem like Mother Theresa.
For our part, being civil has done no more than allowed your kind to be far less so. While it may displease my God (Lord, please forgive me), I no longer intend to be civil to those who have led our nation down a dark path, and that includes those of my own side of the ideological divide. I have grandchildren to consider and you fuckers are a clear and present danger to them. You've no idea what a real jackass can look like.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/is-removing-a-fence-an-act-of-terrorism-5485218
The first ten minutes of the above are relevant to the Biggs case. It highlights modern progressive corruption of whatever truth, facts or law stands in their way.
The Constitution's 6th Amendment demands a quick and speedy trial yet how many Jan 6th defendants are still sitting in jail without a trial. The 8th amendment says there can be no cruel and unusual punishment, so how does that fit with the extremely cruel an unusual punishment meted out to Jan 6 defendants?
It's meted out by cruel and unusual people...the Democrats/leftists/modern progressives/marxists.
How could he have succeeded at something he wasn't trying to do? I've seen no admission by anyone of his group that their intention was to "subvert the Constitution". That's just how you lying lefties spin (that is, LIE) the circumstances.
The jury inferred his intentions from his statements and his actions. The law does not require him to admit that his intention was felonious in order to be convicted.
The funny part (as in, egregiously dishonest and anti-American part) is how clearly your kind has ignored the Constitution with extreme prejudice. That's so particularly true regarding the entire Jan 6 Committee Hearings and the subsequent trials and convictions which resulted from that mockery of Congressional obligation.
That would be the hearings that you refused to watch.
People said stupid things. What evidence was presented in hopes of proving anyone had any plan or intention to hang anyone? Was it that laughable scaffold someone slapped together which couldn't hold a puppy without falling over? The amazing part is that your kind says this shit with a straight face.
As far as I know, no one was charged with attempting to murder Pence, so I wouldn't expect any evidence to be introduced on that issue.
Yes. Actual crimes.
They were convicted of actual crimes by a court of law. I know that doesn't mean anything to you.
An absolute straight up lie from a lefty who chooses not to pay attention to all the facts. "Trump and his minions" have done nothing your asshole overlords haven't done in spades.
It's amusing the way conservative Christians always bemoan moral relativism while they excuse their own conduct with “whataboutisms.”
Thank you. I like to deal in facts. A very detailed chronological report, with video evidence time stamped to help the case, demonstrated how cops initiated a lot of the violent behavior by first lobbing smoke bombs and flash grenades on truly peaceful protesters (contrasted with the violent assholes your kind defended in previous years as they rioted over lies about racist cops) And actual, honest review of the events clearly suggest most of those at the Capitol were peaceful, and those who acted violently were either provoked by the DC cops or by agents provocateurs planted for the purpose (like Ray Epps).
You probably shouldn't use a big word like “facts” when you don't know what it means. Tucker's paranoid fantasies about Ray Epps are not facts.
Ahh...! That race card! I don't believe I've ever seen you play that card, Vinny. I shocked...a little bit anyway, given you are a leftist. What that black man is Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, George Floyd and the like, it has been the black man's fault. Do you lefties EVER deal in truth, reality and fact??? It seems the answer is an unequivocal "NO!"
Oh my gosh! Are we in Florida now where it's illegal to say anything about race if it might make a white person feel bad?
When a Black man is shot by a police officer, conservatives always insist that he should have obeyed the cops. Why doesn't the same hold for the white insurrectionists on January 6th?
I love it when lefties straight up lie about what is clearly intended. It was Jesus who asserted that we will be hated for doing what Jesus did, promoting and defending what He did, objecting to and opposing what He did. It's how I try to live my life and where I've succeeded, I get crap from asshats like you. Not at all a comparison of myself to Jesus, no matter how desperately you intend to assert otherwise.
You claim that you are being hated for doing things that Jesus did. That is comparing your conduct to his.
There's no greater, more obvious jackass than a Democrat politician. The lies and unjustified arrogance which flows from them like a person suffering from terminal diarrhea after a severe drunk makes Trump's famous crudeness and inarticulate manner seem like Mother Theresa.
More moral relativism.
For our part, being civil has done no more than allowed your kind to be far less so. While it may displease my God (Lord, please forgive me), I no longer intend to be civil to those who have led our nation down a dark path, and that includes those of my own side of the ideological divide.
Don't let Jesus' teachings get in the way of your vitriol.
September 5, at 11:38 AM
"The jury inferred his intentions from his statements and his actions."
Bullshit. First, what actions? Do not the actions have to be criminal in some way? So what were his actions?
--He showed up to the rally carrying no weapons.
--He entered the Capitol (twice, I believe) without incident.
--He assaulted no one.
--He shook and possibly knocked down a fence.
Even the strained charge of trespassing is the worst a honorable prosecutor could bring to bear. Nothing which can be shown he did in any way justly merits a terrorism enhancement. Even a twisted leftist like yourself should be honest enough to acknowledge that fact.
And what did he say? I can't respond to that question as I haven't looked at the court transcripts. But did he say he came to "overturn the election"? Or did he more likely say he came to encourage investigating cited problems with the Electoral ballots of swing states before certifying the election? I would wager it's more the latter than the former, but leftist Trump-haters, including juries infer whatever they need to be true. That's how you roll.
The law does require clearing the hurdle of reasonable doubt. But you need reasonable and honest, objective people working the case for that. We know from the terrorism enhancement we didn't have a reasonable, honest and objective judge.
"That would be the hearings you refused to watch."
Yeah. The hearings covered extensively in the desperate and excited hopes of finding fault in Trump supporters. Even clips of your media couldn't hide the open distortion of reality put forth as truth. There was plenty of coverage which relieved me of the task. I'm not going to wager on whether or not you were in front of the TV for the entirety of the hearings, but are only parroting what your leftist media and Dem/Trump-hating heroes tell you.
"As far as I know, no one was charged with attempting to murder Pence..."
But you felt it significant enough to mention as if random outbursts were expressions of intent. Nice backpedal.
"They were convicted of actual crimes by a court of law."
The history of mankind is rife with examples of your kind using that excuse to justify persecuting the innocent. Stalin did, Communist China's done it, islamic governments do it, your kind did in in the American south up until the first half of the 20th century. You're kind is doing it now. When Hillary supporting legal scholars see it happening, you might want to check yourself.
"It's amusing the way conservative Christians always bemoan moral relativism when they excuse their own conduct with "whataboutisms".
Except that the reality is what you write off as "whataboutisms" is pointing out actual crimes and sins of your kind which have no better than a superficial resemblance to actions by mine. For example, the many examples of your kind whining about stolen/illegitimate elections by Trump, GW Bush and Brian Kemp to name just a few. There was nothing untoward in those election wins as there so clearly was with the 2020 elections. With Jan 6, nothing which happened during those few hours compares to the actual assaults on cops, neighborhoods and government buildings by your kind during "Summer of Love". So what you write off as "whataboutisms" is in reality the highlighting of left-wing hypocrisy. Glad I could clear that up for you. You're welcome.
"You probably shouldn't use a big word like "facts" when you don't know what it means."
That's funny. Where are you performing this weekend?
"Tucker's paranoid fantasies about Ray Epps are not facts."
But the facts he reported about Ray Epps are not fantasies...paranoid or otherwise. They're realities which have not been resolved by those who have been railroading old ladies on the charge of "insurrection" and accusing Trump of having incited one.
I'll get to your second comedy comment later.
September 5, 2023 at 11:41 AM
"Oh my gosh! Are we in Florida now where it's illegal to say anything about race if it might make a white person feel bad?"
Oh my gosh! Are we at Dan's blog that you'd try to pretend the comment to which this is in response could in any honest way provoke it?
"When a Black man is shot by a police officer, conservatives always insist that he should have obeyed the cops."
When a black man is shot by a cop, it's usually after the black man's choice to be combative leaves the cop little choice. As even Chris Rock notes from a stand-up bit in the '90s, doing what the cop says will result in not being shot or having your ass beaten. We on the right call it "common sense" and "respect for lawful authorities".
The funny part...in a very "uh-oh! A lefty just indicted himself" kinda way"...is that in the comment above, you rationalized a bullshit verdict over the "inference" of the jury. In these cop shootings you people hold up as evidence of unjust brutality, the cops "inferred" a threat based on threatening behavior by the guy who ultimately gets aggressively restrained or even shot to death.
"Why doesn't the same hold for the white insurrectionists on January 6th?"
Because the two small women killed on Jan 6 weren't a threat. There's even video of Babbitt facing the crowd to get them to calm down before trying to go through the window to her totally unjustified death.
But more importantly, no conservative is defending actual criminal behavior by any on Jan 6 who perpetrated them. While it's so often called "the People's House", we would allow for simple trespassing charge against the vast majority still languishing in jail without a trial. But you can't rail against these people after making no noise against actual terrorists acts by your own as described in the previous comment, given even at its worst, this protest doesn't come close to what your kind did and continue to do.
"You claim that you are being hated for doing things that Jesus did. That is comparing your conduct to his."
Ah...moving the goal posts. You said, "I love it when Trumpers compare themselves to Jesus." That's different than what you're more honestly presenting now. But I referred to Christ's own words with regard to how we will be treated in following His Way. You know this but tried to pretend I'm comparing myself to Jesus. But hey...another nice backpedal. You're really good at that!
"More moral relativism."
No. It's more pointing out your hypocrisy for criticizing Trump for that which you and your kind perpetrate in a far more false manner.
"Don't let Jesus' teachings get in the way of your vitriol."
I'm talking about the unvarnished truth about the lies and crimes of your kind...taking off the kid gloves and disregarding how sensitive you are and how offended you pretend to be. And given the great harm your kind continues to inflict upon the USA, it's not in conflict with Christ's teachings to point out your crimes and lies for the crimes and lies they are. Too many have suffered enough and I have grandchildren to think about. If you wish to falsely posture as pious and worthy of civility, you might want to be more pious and civil yourself. It's not at all reflected in your accusations and criticisms of conservatives or right-leaning people in general. And that's another case of your hypocrisy, not "whataboutisms".
And what did he say? I can't respond to that question as I haven't looked at the court transcripts. But did he say he came to "overturn the election"? Or did he more likely say he came to encourage investigating cited problems with the Electoral ballots of swing states before certifying the election? I would wager it's more the latter than the former, but leftist Trump-haters, including juries infer whatever they need to be true.
Really? How much would you care to wager?
I'm not going to wager on whether or not you were in front of the TV for the entirety of the hearings, but are only parroting what your leftist media and Dem/Trump-hating heroes tell you.
That's another wager you would lose, because I'm pretty sure I watched all the hearings.
There's even video of Babbitt facing the crowd to get them to calm down before trying to go through the window to her totally unjustified death.
Maybe she should have considered setting a better example by not climbing through the broken window.
While it's so often called "the People's House", we would allow for simple trespassing charge against the vast majority still languishing in jail without a trial.
That's very big of you.
"Really? How much would you care to wager?"
It's an expression, Vinny. I'm sure you know that. Well...not really sure, given it's you. But rather than your sad attempt to be clever, how about you simply produce his exact words. After all, you watched it all on the TV and pretend you were looking at justice and honesty.
"That's another wager you would lose, because I'm pretty sure I watched all the hearings."
More's the pity. I'm sure you experienced constant tingling up your thigh while your itching ears were more than satisfied. And then you parrot what your Trump-hating heroes tell you. Sad.
"Maybe she should have considered setting a better example by not climbing through the broken window."
Maybe your Nancy Pelosi shouldn't have rejected Trump's offer of security. You clearly aren't a good source for "good examples".
"That's very big of you."
No. That's just simple honesty given that's the worst most of those 800 arrested should charged. There's no legit charge of sedition or insurrection except what is actually perpetrated by your people.
Post a Comment