Friday, October 16, 2020

Can't Be Surprised

 I have come to pretty much ignore everything from Dan's troll, due to his never-ending childish, hateful and truly evil character and manner.  But now and then one stumbles upon a special piece of evidence that my description of him is accurate.  Here's one such piece...and you know what I mean by that:
 

"If Obama had paid off a porn star, or said he grabbed women by the pussy, he wouldn't have been nominated.  He wouldn't have been a Senator.  He would have been a State Senator.  Take all the days of Trump after and pile them on that."

Lefties think their opponents are like them.  It's typical of the low character individual to believe since he does it, then his opponents are likely to do it as well.  This isn't unusual necessarily.  If one acts a particular way, one generally leans toward the belief that one is acting normally or typically, and thus, others are similarly prone to acting in the same manner.  That's why good people get taken for rides so often.  

It's the same for the wicked.  If they are untrustworthy, for example, they won't trust anyone else, assuming everyone else is just likely to be as untrustworthy as they are.  Here, since Dan's troll agrees with attacking Trump as the left is wont to do, he assumes those on the other side of the divide act in the same manner.  But while that might be true for a few, it's hardly typical of that which is so common for the left...especially those like Dan and his troll...of which there are shamefully too many. 

For example, Dan's troll refers to Trump paying off a porn star.  As has been said before, and is far from uncommon among the wealthy, especially celebs, there are those who see them as targets of opportunity.  For those running for public office, or simply wish to maintain a good image, attempts at blackmail will compel the target to choose the payoff for reasons of expediency.  For a candidate for public office, to stifle the blackmailer's threat to expose the candidate to public scrutiny to behaviors real or fiction, especially in the eleventh hour of a campaign, a payoff to insure silence might be made.  Once the deal is made, and the election is over, any breech of contract or other new allegations won't be as damaging.  The target can better deal with the allegations at that time without concern to any campaign.  Was this the case with Trump?  Who knows.  Besides Trump and Stormy, that is.  All we know for sure is that a deal was made, she broke her promise after taking the money and the Trump-haters and lefty liars will continue to insist that the payoff means the affair took place.  They need people to believe an affair took place because their only goal is to make Trump look bad...because they have no way to truly overcome his good work for America...because a guy like Trump just can't be smarter than they are.

Then there's the lie about grabbing women by the crotch.  The sick, morally bankrupt left can't let this one go.  They need to believe, and have everyone else believe, that Trump admitted grabbing women in this manner.  The truth was never hidden.  The truth is that he never said he actually grabbed women in this manner, but that because of his celebrity and wealth, gold-diggers will allow that behavior from those who might do such things, in order to profit by the association.  Pretty much like lefties.

But here's the truth:  If Obama had paid off a whore for her silence, he still would have been elected State Senator because he's from Illinois and still would've maintained support of the Dem voters of the state.  He's a scumbag, and scumbags from Chicago play the game in a crooked manner:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/06/the_irs_the_nsa_and_obamas_dirty_tricks.html

https://stoneformayor.com/obamas-strategy-to-win-at-all-costs-violated-his-challengers-civil-rights/

https://humanevents.com/2012/08/01/ann-coulter-obamas-signature-move-unsealing-private-records/

If Obama survived dirty tricks as described in the above links, paying off a whore wouldn't have seen the light of day in Illinois.  It would've been reduced to scant rumors easily ignored, as Obama had ignored so many rumors his entire career.

The same is true about grabbing women.  First, if he actually was recorded as saying he grabbed women in the aforementioned manner, that too wouldn't have gotten media release.  The media always shields the Democrat.  However, if he had the same exact conversation with Billy Bush that Trump had had, the media would be all over it insisting that he never actually said he personally ever actually grabbed a woman in that manner, as the media...and liars like Dan and his troll...refuse to do.  The video of Trump is still available, no doubt.  I've posted it for Dan at least twice, if not more. 

Dan's troll is wrong (again) and the fact is that the right doesn't behave as the left does.  We clean up where we hold our rallies.  We seek the truth with a willingness to accept it, rather than a self-serving desire to spin it.  We don't defend or hide bad behavior of our own.  We are not the left, and at the risk of coming off like the Pharisee in the synagogue (Luke 18:9-14), I thank God.  May we never be so.

2 comments:

Dan Trabue said...

That's really cute, how you give this disgusting perverted scumbag, Trump, the benefit of the doubt. Or it would be cute if the man were not such a deviant sack of s*** who has harmed countless numbers of lives with his oppression of women, his employees and minorities.

Marshal Art said...

So you think giving a person the benefit of the doubt is "cute"? Is that not what you've done with those you favor? Of course you have, and in spades. While you pretend Trump grabbed some woman by the crotch, Biden's victim, Tara Reade, has described Biden as having done exactly that, with one important distinction: Trump speaks of women who would LET him do it. Biden attacked Reade in a blatant sexual assault. You ignore real rape to chastise a guy who's speaking of a consensual act. Typical.