https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoEUV_UzOL8
More history the "progressives" don't know or don't want anyone to know.
I continue to watch more from Mr. Jackson, and so I add the following:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ypZkZFr8ws
The more of this I see and read, the more I see Dan as a product of it, which speaks volumes about why he says what he says and supports what he supports. I've long regarded him as far, far left, using words like "socialist" or "marxist". What I see in these videos only more solidly validates my impression of the guy as marxist as well in spite of his denials. And Jackson's mention of the "social gospel", "progressive" churches and the things they support (all of which Dan does as well) make it hard to miss the connection between his descriptions of it all and Dan. There's another about W.E.B. Du Bois which should be equally enlightening, but it's another 1.5 hrs, so I'll save it for later. Instead, here's a short one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hmRJhJz89Y
Yet another from Chad O. Jackson, this time only ten minutes in length, which addresses comparisons between the assassinations of MLK JR and Charlie Kirk. The very idea of linking them at all is absurd given what we know of each. Yet, "progressives" laud the sexual deviant, woman-beating MLK, while pretending Kirk was some kind of evil racist or more humorously, "homophobe".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPCc1yberBg
Because I subscribed to Jackson's channel, I see lots of options for learning about what he's uncovered. While I've not yet coughed up whatever cash is required to get his series on MLK, I can still see lots of what he does, watch interviews he gives and hosts, so there's no shortage of information which exposes Dan's "saint" as far more like what Dan accuses Trump of being than Trump has ever actually demonstrated himself to be. What this means is that Dan is truly far more conned by marixts than I felt I already knew, and among the greatest con men is MLK JR himself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTw-v2qenbs
Tuesday, May 26, 2026
BVM. We Should LTT!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Obviously we should LTBV and decide how much weight we give what they say based on something other than skin color.
I'm really impressed by and with the work of Chad O. Jackson and how he exposes, not only the real MKL JR., but the entire "civil rights" movement. I think the only white people he highlighted in this video, be they interview subjects or whatever, were the communists and marxists behind King, the civil rights movement and BLM. Very telling that the "black voices" to whom we're chastised to listen are all...or mostly...white men.
Also notable was the familiarity of so much which was espoused by the various subjects of this documentary. I expected to see a young Dan Trabue somewhere in the crowds!
"Exposing" MLK?
You Anti-Christ-ian conspiracy theorists love to make devils of saints while supporting hedonists and vile, godless humans.
Yes, Dan. Exposing MLK JR for the fraud he was. As Dr. Carol Swain said (paraphrasing here), "If King was advocating for judging another by content of character rather than color of skin, on what basis should we not also judge King's character?" Jackson's case against MLK and the movement he led is beyond YOUR ability to refute, and that's for damned sure. You're a chump for that cause, too, because you're limited in your shallow reasoning. King was no Christian, but exploited the term much as you do to push a marxist agenda which has done little to benefit the black race.
In the meantime, neither I, nor anyone I know (aside from you) support any hedonists or vile, godless humans. Nice projecting there, Karen.
I was under the impression that all humans were intrinsically imperfect, including King. What could possibly be wrong with a black gentleman looking into the parts of King's past which have not gotten as much publicity as perhaps they should.
It's almost as if Dan thinks that the "good" things King did should outweigh the not "good" things and that the not "good" should simply be buried.
Don't kid yourself, Craig (I've no doubt you're not kidding yourself here). Dan never watched any of the videos. At best, he watched but didn't seek to verify or prove false anything which was presented in them. He's merely indulging in the very type of unquestioning worship he accuses of Trump supporters.
Oh, I can't imagine that Dan even hit play on the video, let alone watched it. That would be completely out of character.
Likewise, as I'm working on the data that shows the poor methodology of the data he cites like it's Gospel Truth, I know that it's a waste of time and that he won't bother with any of it.
The LEFT supports evil and crime. Both are exposed in these videos.
I watched that first video and it was excellent as well as eye-opening. I started both the others but decided I need more time so they are on my "to watch" list.
Yeah...I set aside time to watch them. Lately, I've come across a number of videos which require time. So far, each has been worth the time.
Dan is stupid beyond belief. Anyone who gets caught in one of his web strands is bound to become stupid beyond escape or even rescue. Anyone who follows his advice is doomed to be broke.
I don't understand why anyone posts Dan's comments at their blogs. I know that is other people's choice to make, but why dialogue with somebody who clearly thinks you are all uneducated, that you're not able to think deeply, or that you're essentially an uncivilized brute?
He is so ugly, it hurts.
Well, his heretical character certainly is.
Why I allow him? Mostly entertainment, as well as the fact that he encapsulates the current "progressive" mindset very well (not doubt he'd take that as a compliment) and thus one is likely to hear the same crap heard by others of his kind on other forums. This means, it amusing to watch him fail to defend his positions, fail to expose errors in ours and as such fail to justify his arrogant condescension.
Post a Comment