I may take a couple or more posts to deal with the midterms elections. One of the most moronic outcomes was the re-election of Democrat morons governors. For example, my former home of IL re-elected JB Prickster who had already announced, and had analyzed by intelligent people, an act which will aid and abet criminals, called, "the SAFE-T Act"(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asVws3Ef9XI)(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC_qdm501LM). It's a horror. Then in Michigan, voters rejected a bright woman of character, Tudor Dixon in favor of retaining Gretchen Whitless (https://michiganrisingaction.org/2022/08/01/governor-gretchen-whitmer-is-failing-michiganders/) so that they can be locked down again at a moment's notice should anyone get the sniffles. It's a horror. And of course there's Kathy Hochul. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11394505/NY-Governor-Hochul-slammed-woke-MSNBC-anchor-NYCs-control-crime-wave.html) She's just a horror. (SIDE BAR: As regards the last link above, it shows murder and shooting victim rates are down. Is it the result of better law enforcement, poor ability to murder and/or hit one's target or a target poor environment due to fewer people venturing out where their lives are more at risk?)
So the sad troll feo tried posting this below in celebration of his stupidity and that of fellow New Yorkers who apparently want more crime, cost and emigrants so they can pay all the taxes themselves:
Oh. And we New Yorkers voted to protect our city from White Supremacists like you. All amendment proposals passed.
1. Ballot Question #1: Add a Statement of Values to Guide Government This proposal would amend the New York City Charter to: Add a preamble, which would be an introductory statement of values and vision aspiring toward “a just and equitable city for all” New Yorkers; and Include in the preamble a statement that the City must strive to remedy “past and continuing harms and to reconstruct, revise, and reimagine our foundations, structures, institutions, and laws to promote justice and equity for all New Yorkers.”
2. Ballot Question #2: Establish a Racial Equity Office, Plan, and Commission This proposal would amend the City Charter to: Require citywide and agency-specific Racial Equity Plans every two years. The plans would include intended strategies and goals to improve racial equity and to reduce or eliminate racial disparities; Establish an Office of Racial Equity and appoint a Chief Equity Officer to advance racial equity and coordinate the City’s racial equity planning process. The Office would support City agencies in improving access to City services and programs for those people and communities who have been negatively affected by previous policies or actions, and collect and report data related to equity; and Establish a Commission on Racial Equity, appointed by City elected officials. In making appointments to this Commission, elected officials would be required to consider appointees who are representative of or have experience advocating for a diverse range of communities. The Commission would identify and propose priorities to inform the racial equity planning process and review agency and citywide Racial Equity Plans.
3. Ballot Question #3: Measure the True Cost of Living This proposal would amend the City Charter to: Require the City to create a “true cost of living” measure to track the actual cost in New York City of meeting essential needs, including housing, food, childcare, transportation, and other necessary costs, and without considering public, private, or informal assistance, in order to inform programmatic and policy decisions; and Require the City government to report annually on the “true cost of living” measure.
Apparently, feo, being a self-loathing, white-guilted race-hustler thinks he knows a white supremacist when he sees one. Obviously, he's a moron because there's nothing he could ever find among almost 15 years of blogging anything among my comments which suggests racism on my part. But like a good little lefty, he regards everyone not as ideologically stupid as he is as a racist. It's what lefties do. They see "white supremacists" everywhere. So rather than protect their fellow citizens, particularly lower income black citizens who are disproportionately victims of violent crime, they choose to protect themselves against a myth of their own making with the above laughably impotent amendments to their city charter. Let's look at each briefly:
1. The chief concern of this point and the next is "equity" (https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/political-correctness/equity-when-the-left-goes-too-far/) which at its heart for the left is simply equal outcomes or, the notion that lack of good outcome is somehow based on some form or prejudice or discrimination. It never means a given failure is a failure through that failure's failure to strive for excellence or is limited by physical or mental challenges. Equity, to the left, means "white man bad". This is true because rarely (I'm being generously open-minded here) do we ever see anyone defend a white guy as being a victim of a lack of equity. Thus, it's a racist concept because of how the racist lefties have perverted the term. So the problem is in just how they will determine a failure to achieve or succeed is the result of some lack of equity? So far, they simply assert it. Point one doesn't provide any hints.
2. This point suggests part of whatever that plan is begins with a commission to provide plans to ensure "racial" equity, demonstrating the racism of the plan and the people who came up with this crap sandwich. You'll note as you read through it that it's difficult to imagine that subjectivity won't play a major role in the implementation and enforcement of any "racial equity" plan. What guarantee will there be to prevent and punish frivolous claims one is a victim? As has been the case thus far, every charge of racism or "white supremacist"...and feo's the perfect example of this grievous slander...will require those charged to prove their innocence. The accusation will be proof of guilt. That's how it works with the left.
3. This point is government interference codified into law. They'll tally what they believe the cost of living has become and then provide that to activists who'll seek to force employers to raise wages and benefits to accommodate that cost. Not only will they not do a damned thing to teach and encourage people to live within their means while the costs is what it is at the time of implementation, they likely will never allow those wages and benefits to be reduced to reflect any positive change in the cost of living...that is, should things get less expensive. What a great way to compel more businesses to flee the city!!
Frankly, I can't see how any of these three reflect Constitutional principles which can't lead to their being struck down by a state or federal court, particularly the last one. The second will likely increase the case load as every attempt to punish an entity for a perceived lack of equity will potentially wind up in court.
So here we have a people...the citizens of New York City...doubling down on stupidity with these nonsensical amendments the City Idiot feo regards as reason for celebration and feeling superior to better people he falsely regards as "white supremacists". Electing Hochul should have been enough to prove what morons New Yorkers are. But they couldn't help themselves.
Well, good luck to you New York (city AND state). You deserve the suffering which will now increase. You clearly wanted more of it.
11 comments:
But they're not just morons. Some of them are murderous as well. Some of their candidates, like Kelley in AZ, who at this writing may be the winner against Blake Masters, was vague about his abortion beliefs other than to repeat that he supported Roe v Wade. This turns on the most morally bankrupt of the party who believe there's nothing more important in life than getting off one's rocks by engaging in the very act designed to create a new person...and then murdering that person because its presence is inconvenient. These are among the most vile people in the United States (second only to those who support the practice while daring to call themselves Christians). But then, there is so much about the Democratic Party which is so incredibly selfish and self-serving and always at the expense of others. God help us that such people are such a stain our national culture and character. We all have sin natures. Some of us...the leftists among us...are intent on promoting it as a "good".
Come one, you can't blame those of us who DID vote AGAINST Kathy Hocul. I can't afford to move elsewhere.
Here is a policy supported by another democrat senator from Arizona:
https://twitter.com/kyrstensinema/status/1588214432995352576
Why is this person dressed up in scarecrow attire?!?!? Why the weird background music?
I don't know who you are, but welcome (unless you're the "anonymous" person from above).
Dems like to pretend that these "Dreamers" are somehow entitled simply because they, or at least some of them, were brought here by their parents and as such are not responsible for their presence here and thus should not be punished for being here illegally. It's certainly unfortunate for them, especially if some of them can't even speak their native tongue. But we can't simply pretend the don't belong here because of their illegal status and treat them as if they're actual citizens. I'm not sure how to deal with it, except that they should be deported along with their parents, or any legal relatives or friends of the family should take complete custody of them with the stipulation that no other relatives...immediate family or otherwise...should be allowed to enter the country because they're already here, as if they're all anchor babies.
Regarding the link, these kids are still non-citizens. How, then, do they qualify for in-state tuition given they are of the state? It "sounds" like a charitable move, but it sets a bad precedent others will follow to exploit as these kids (or their families) are. I would vote "no" if I was an AZ citizen.
Are any of you going to condemn unequivocally the shooting of gay folk at the Club Q in Colorado, apparently by a conservative?
November 21, 2022 at 8:51 PM
"Are any of you going to condemn unequivocally the shooting of gay folk at the Club Q in Colorado, apparently by a conservative?"
How can you possibly feel that we must? I've been trying to find out about this guy, and to date I've found nothing that suggests motive in any way. For all I know, he's a homosexual who couldn't get a date in that bar.
Personally, I'm not particularly more or less concerned about who gets shot up by lunatics. I'm far more concerned with the wanton destruction of people in utero and the assholes who enable it. It's far harder to write that off as mental illness, though it's clearly the most vile of corruptness of the souls of such people. But those are the morons who vote, too.
And indeed, I don't think Dan's EVER condemned unequivocally the 100's of thousands of innocents murdered in utero, nor have I seen him unequivocally condemn the political jailing of hundreds of people who did nothing more than perhaps trespass in "the People's House" on Jan 6, 2021...hundreds denied their Constitutional right to a speedy trial. Many have been treated poorly...on purpose...with one guy being denied his medications for his early stage cancer, which progressed to stage three before a judge ordered him released. All of which happened because morons voted.
As to this dude in Colorado, he was a known to have threatened his mother with a bomb and then released after his arrest with his record sealed, which allowed him the ability to get the gun he used on Club Q...because morons voted.
I read an article about this shooting, by some jackwagon "journalist" who claims "nearly" 1 in five hate crimes is now motivated by an anti-LGBTQ+ bias. ("Nearly"??? You mean it could be 1 in 6?) But then this "journalist" goes on to list examples of "hate crimes" against LGBT people. Among them was the Pulse Nightclub attack, in which the perp was a regular customer and several people claimed he was "gay", which family members claimed the FBI requested they not say that to the media.
Then there was the Uptown Lounge fire in '73, which there remains suspicion the perp was a disturbed "gay" guy.
Harvey Milk, like Mathew Shepard also mentioned, were not killed because they were "gay".
When you add cases like these (I didn't peruse them all and was aware of these prior), it's easy to pad the stats so as to convince people this community is under greater siege than it is.
Personally, I don't care what one's motivation is. I also don't view a targeted murder any different than any other, since the vast majority of victims are targeted for some reason or another. I condemn that unequivocally. This "hate crime" crap is just to stoke sympathy for a particular group, in this case, one which continues to grapple with the knowledge they're disordered in their attractions and immoral in their behavior. I condemn that unequivocally as well. But this community is hardly the most oppressed and targeted and those like Dan who believes we should all rally with him in their defense cares nothing for a far more innocent and defenseless segment of our society and he unequivocally doesn't give a shit. So Dan can go pound sand.
Oh...and here's another thing I condemn unequivocally but Dan won't: the political exploitation of this crime by Biden and other lefties to push for ineffective gun control. Sickening bastards all.
Good gosh! I just thought of ANOTHER thing this shooting compels me to condemn unequivocally: "Stochastic terrorism"!!!!! Scientific America defines it thusly:
“Dehumanizing and vilifying a person or group of people via ideologically driven hate speech increases the likelihood that people will violently and unpredictably attack the targets of vicious claims.
“Stochastic terrorism exploits one of our strongest and most complicated emotions: disgust.”
What patent crap which only leftists could conjure!!! Here, the idea is that because honest people of character rightly speak out against the abomination of pervert adult men dressed as sleazy bitches sexualizing small children, the LGBT community is at greater risk!! Doesn't matter than even some "gay" people have come out against the horrors now being perpetrated against children (see Gays Against Groomin). Perhaps my mentioning this term now might preclude Dan using it as nauseum. I doubt it. It's just the kind of thing he adopts as if it has any validity.
It's not crap, it's reality. It's just that you, living your life of white straight privilege, can't fathom that a group of people being demonized could be that big of a deal. But marginalized, historically oppressed groups KNOW the reality that repeated demonizations and attacks bring.
The world is much bigger than your little white straight conservative closet, Marshal. Open the door and come out.
It's always a big deal when a group of people are targeted because they belong to that group...such as "white, 'straight' (read: normal people) conservatives", or true Christians. But what makes it a big deal has far less to do with the group than that murderous intent of the person(s) doing the attacking.
It's also a bigger deal when leftist assholes exploit such situations by engaging in their attacks on truth tellers, like "white, 'straight' (read: normal people) conservatives" and true Christians, as if they must stop speaking truthfully because some lunatic appears compelled by their truth telling to perpetuate murder.
And of course, lying leftists like you have no real defense of the positions you take, which is why you label truth telling as "demonization", thereby demonizing truth. Honest people have come to expect that from you liars because you really have nothing else.
So once again, conservatives abhor murder...be it the murder of the immoral minding their own business when engaging in their immorality, or the murder of far, far more innocent people in utero by assholes who pretend their victims aren't even people endowed by their Creator with the unalienable right to life...just as those immoral and disordered LGBT people are.
Post a Comment