It's natural for the average human being to gravitate towards what's perceived as beautiful. One wants to drink in the vision of it, to reach out and touch it or to embrace it. Given the object of attention, to at least preserve the opportunity to be near it as often as possible. Such things appeal on an emotional level. They provoke a visceral response stirring something within and compelling a sense of pleasure while in its presence to the extent one wishes never to leave it. It can touch some on a spiritual level, as indeed, the beautiful seems heaven-sent. A gift from the Almighty.
A sunset, a rainbow, a purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain. A painting or sculpture of the great masters. A tune, a flower, a meadow. A newborn, a flock of birds in flight.
A hot babe. Oh yes. A beautiful female.
Womankind is a gift of God to men. The female form was intended to appeal to men, and the best of them do sometimes far more than any woman would like. But every normal man gets it. Every normal man is enamored of a beautiful woman. No normal man would pretend they are not taken by the sight of a beautiful woman. Moved by it. <i>Aroused</i> by it. It's automatic. An involuntary response. It's as it is meant to be.
It's as it is meant to be. It would make no sense that God would provide a "helpmate" which man would find repulsive or even easy to disregard. It would make no sense to then say, "Go forth and multiply" only to have man respond, "Aw, gee, do I have to?" No. Man says, "May I obey all your commands with equal pleasure, Sire!" and he does so because he is attracted to the beauty of the female.
Somehow, this reality is foreign to a particular prog from Kentucky. It's considered by him to be perversion. To that end, he cites Donald Trump as a peculiar example. I recall Trump saying something to the effect that when he sees a beautiful woman, he has to kiss her. He can't help himself. Well, here's the actual video showing more than what has commonly been presented:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-hot-mic-when-you-re-star-you-can-do-n662116
So here we see the Donald (or rather, hear the Donald) speaking to others in a situation so incredibly common to men, where they speak in a ribald manner as normal guys are wont to do (note: this is not to say it's what good Christian men do, but even good Christian men do it more often than they ought---it's just a fact). You'll hear him say what liars like to pervert to mean he actually grabs women by the crotch without their consent. But what to do we actually see? They see a woman approaching, make "lecherous" comments about her, but when he steps off the bus and greets her, what does he do? He shakes her hand! It's not until Billy Bush encourages here to give Trump a hug does Trump touch her more than that and a hug is ALL which happens!
Ah, but that's just one incident which Dan can no longer exploit but will nonetheless having seen the video yet again, but with more detail which shows Trump acting in a more gentlemanly manner to Dan's great chagrin. What's more, it Bush who is acting poorly and without him there, it appears Trump would not have done a damned thing a "grace embracing" fake would hope to see.
Is Trump fond of hot babes? He'd be perverse if he wasn't. So would 99% of the male population. Does he like to be around them? He'd be perverse if he didn't. So would 99% of the male population. You know what would be perverse? If Trump had the hots for Billy Bush.
I was at the beach today. I ogled, leered and possibly drooled. At the same time, my wife was enjoying the sight of handsome males. According to Dan, we're a couple of pervs.
May I obey all your commands with equal pleasure, sire!
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood
May I obey all your commands with equal pleasure, sire!
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood
May I obey all your commands with equal pleasure, sire!
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=the-adventures-of-robin-hood
24 comments:
Ogling and leering at women on the beach doesn't make a man a pervert: it makes him a creep.
Acting like a gentleman in front of women while bragging about assaulting them behind their backs also makes a man a creep.
Entering a female locker room in the hopes of seeing a teenage girl in a state of undress also makes a man a creep.
"Ogling and leering at women on the beach doesn't make a man a pervert: it makes him a creep."
Typical of a lefty, you totally ignore the point made in the post for the purpose of demonizing. I'm not going to entertain the notion that when confronted by the sight of a hot babe, you'll avert your gaze. No. If you're a normal man, you'll take in the vision of loveliness up to the point someone might suspect you of being creepy for doing what is natural.
"Acting like a gentleman in front of women while bragging about assaulting them behind their backs also makes a man a creep."
"Acting" like a gentleman is what is expected of all men in the presence of women. It doesn't require one actually be a gentleman. But in reality, even gentlemen have their desires, urges and close friends with whom they will joke about fantasies they would never live out because they're moral.
"Entering a female locker room in the hopes of seeing a teenage girl in a state of undress also makes a man a creep."
As this is most likely based on Trump's comments expressed on the Howard Stern show, it requires one to presume they know without proof that he actually intended to walk in in order to catch teenage girls in stages of undress, rather than consider the possibility he walked in accidentally (this is the guy lefties like to claim is an unintelligent idiot) and only claimed on the show he did so purposely (this the guy lefties like to claim is an inveterate and compulsive liar). And keep in mind, this is the Howard Stern show, where guests feel inclined to join in his salacious, locker room discussions. Stern, by your definition, is definitely a creep given how often his talk defaults to the sexual.
Only Trump knows for sure if he walked in intentionally to that dressing room. I've heard no one give testimony that he intended to. Maybe such a person exists. It would be nice to have some Trump-hater provide such when accusing him of such things.
Typical of a lefty, you totally ignore the point made in the post for the purpose of demonizing. I'm not going to entertain the notion that when confronted by the sight of a hot babe, you'll avert your gaze. No. If you're a normal man, you'll take in the vision of loveliness up to the point someone might suspect you of being creepy for doing what is natural.
I'm not ignoring your point: I simply don't buy it. As much as I enjoy the sight of an attractive woman, I don't stare or ogle because I never want to take in a vision of loveliness in such a way that I make a woman feel self-conscious or uncomfortable. The attractive women I have known enjoy being appreciated, but they don't like being leered at. I think that a normal man can enjoy the sight of a beautiful woman without drooling.
"Acting" like a gentleman is what is expected of all men in the presence of women. It doesn't require one actually be a gentleman. But in reality, even gentlemen have their desires, urges and close friends with whom they will joke about fantasies they would never live out because they're moral.
So Billy Bush and Trump are close friends? And Howard Stern and Trump are close friends. I've been an agnostic for a long time, but I was raised in a Christian home, and I was taught that the true test of character is what a person does when he doesn't think anyone is watching.
As this is most likely based on Trump's comments expressed on the Howard Stern show, it requires one to presume they know without proof that he actually intended to walk in in order to catch teenage girls in stages of undress, rather than consider the possibility he walked in accidentally (this is the guy lefties like to claim is an unintelligent idiot) and only claimed on the show he did so purposely (this the guy lefties like to claim is an inveterate and compulsive liar). And keep in mind, this is the Howard Stern show, where guests feel inclined to join in his salacious, locker room discussions. Stern, by your definition, is definitely a creep given how often his talk defaults to the sexual.
Trump's comments on Howard Stern's merely confirm what multiple pageant contestants have said Trump did. Personally, I do find Stern to be somewhat creepy.
Only Trump knows for sure if he walked in intentionally to that dressing room. I've heard no one give testimony that he intended to. Maybe such a person exists. It would be nice to have some Trump-hater provide such when accusing him of such things.
I agree that Trump is the only one who knows for sure what his intent was when he walked into those dressing rooms. Trump says that his intent was to catch the pageant contestants in a state of undress. What more evidence could I possibly supply?
"As much as I enjoy the sight of an attractive woman, I don't stare or ogle because I never want to take in a vision of loveliness in such a way that I make a woman feel self-conscious or uncomfortable."
First of all, you've perhaps not read all the comments in the previous thread wherein Dan once again sought to portray me as some kind of pervert for defending the natural inclination of men in general to be possessed of lurid thoughts at the sight of a hot babe. In Dan's mind, and apparently yours, some unspecific time is allowed to lapse enjoying the vision of a given hot babe before some pseudo-sanctimonious asshat lefty dares presume to have the authority to dictate just how long is enough. I say it can be indefinite. Who the hell are the likes of you guys to insist I must turn away from looking at anything I find enjoyable to witness for as long as I choose to witness it??
So this post was in response to that, and my little beach story was a yanking of his pretentious, insincere chain.
Second, what makes you asshats think I would gaze upon a fine chick while she grows more uncomfortable with my doing so? You assholes are so keen on assuming the worst of your ideological opponents without basis. You want right-wingers to be the monsters you so desperately need them to be so as to make your claims to the moral high ground valid.
"So Billy Bush and Trump are close friends? And Howard Stern and Trump are close friends."
Only a lefty would presume some connection which doesn't exist in order to disparage. Though the full video of Trump and Bush clearly demonstrated him acting like a gentleman when meeting the actress right after where he spoke about how gold-diggers will let celebrity men do anything...right after saying how when he sees a hot babe he just starts kissing them, and can't help himself. Well, he saw this hot babe and what does he do? He shakes her hand and did nothing more until Bush encouraged her to give Trump a hug. No groping, no kissing, just a quick hug he didn't initiate. No Trump-hater felt the need to speak of that while pretending he said he grabs women by the crotch, and what's more, it's an example of what I've been saying. Admitting one is turned on by a good looking woman doesn't mean one is beyond self-control, even if the lust provokes lurid thoughts. You lefties are so full of shit.
"I've been an agnostic for a long time, but I was raised in a Christian home, and I was taught that the true test of character is what a person does when he doesn't think anyone is watching."
So, you've never engaged in ribald humor with friends of yours? Never? "I simply don't buy it." One would think you guys believe women never do so with regard to men.
"Trump's comments on Howard Stern's merely confirm what multiple pageant contestants have said Trump did."
Not disputing he walked into their dressing area. I'm disputing he did so on purpose. How can you possibly prove it? Because of what he said on the Howard Stern show, where that kind of talk is routine and celebs tend to join in for the fun of it? And of course, whatever he says, you guys insist he's a compulsive liar, but this you choose to take as gospel truth. Typical.
"Personally, I do find Stern to be somewhat creepy."
That's only because he is.
"Trump says that his intent was to catch the pageant contestants in a state of undress. What more evidence could I possibly supply?"
Again, that you choose to take as gospel truth from a guy you otherwise regard as a liar. Typical.
Not disputing he walked into their dressing area. I'm disputing he did so on purpose. How can you possibly prove it?
I suppose if I had Trump on tape before he entered, saying that he knew that it was the girl's locker room and that he was entering in the hopes of seeing young girls with their clothes off, that would be even stronger evidence. However, I have no doubt that you could come up with an innocent explanation even for that.
Because of what he said on the Howard Stern show, where that kind of talk is routine and celebs tend to join in for the fun of it?
I've never listened to Howard Stern enough to know whether middle-aged celebs routinely brag about things like their ability to barge in on teenage girls while they are undressed, but I would consider anyone who did so to be a creep.
And of course, whatever he says, you guys insist he's a compulsive liar, but this you choose to take as gospel truth. Typical.
So he either he's a creep or he's lying because he wants people to believe he's a creep.
Marshal... "Second, what makes you asshats think I would gaze upon a fine chick while she grows more uncomfortable with my doing so?"
Because SO MANY guys do it ALL the time. It's not an uncommon experience, just ask women. They FEEL the threat and the leers and the insinuations all the time, every day, any time they're in view of men. This is common knowledge.
And because YOU are the one defending guys leering, ogling at women and even teen-aged girls.
THEY FEEL that threat of the ever-pervasive leer and not just at the beach when they wear a swimsuit that YOUR type think is "enticing" or "inviting" the leers and ogles of men like you.
The thing that I learned from my wonderful conservative men and women mentors and teachers growing up is the same thing I hear from liberals and others who are just decent people: MEN are not animals. They/we can choose to ogle or leer in ways that make women and children uncomfortable AND they/we can choose NOT to do that.
My conservative Christian teachers expected me to be in the latter group. As do my liberal pagan friends. Just be not a creep/pervert.
" you've never engaged in ribald humor with friends of yours? Never? "
Not in any way that I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing with my sweet grandmother, no. Not when I was a conservative lad/young man because my conservative mentors expected better of me. And not later, amongst my liberal, pagan and Christian feminist friends expect better of me. And just because, why would I?
Look, I TOTALLY get that this is normative for many, many men. Just like rape and slavery used to be normative for many people. Doesn't mean that we can't grow out of that rape culture (and that's what that leering, ogling is, you know? Part of the rape - "women are for men's visual titillation" ownership patriarchal culture.)
And understand: This does NOT mean that we don't acknowledge sexuality in healthy ways. Of course, we do! It's just the difference between healthy and respectful and leering and pervy practices that make women and children uncomfortable.
That 15 year old (or 12 year old!) who you would say "has an adult body" is not wearing that bikini for YOUR sick titillation and perverse enjoyment. You can be a better person than that.
August 22, 2022 at 11:46 AM
"Because SO MANY guys do it ALL the time."
I see. So because "SO MANY guys" do it all the time, I do it all the time. Nice, you grace embracing asshole.
"They FEEL the threat and the leers and the insinuations all the time, every day, any time they're in view of men."
Only the snowflake feminists among whom only a small percentage are targets of such behavior. Strong, conservative women aren't ignorant of it, but don't wet themselves over it every time it might happen...that is, unless they're into demeaning manhood like moronic feminists and leftists (same thing).
"And because YOU are the one defending guys leering, ogling at women and even teen-aged girls."
And here you go lying again. I wasn't defending the behavior. I was explaining the reality of it and now natural and common to manhood it is, even among the best of us (you're not among the best of us...not by a long shot).
"THEY FEEL that threat of the ever-pervasive leer and not just at the beach when they wear a swimsuit that YOUR type think is "enticing" or "inviting" the leers and ogles of men like you."
Way to overstate it...unless all you know are frightened little snowflake women. "MY" type? You mean those of us who take our cues from Scripture which preaches against immodest dress? The way too many women and girls dress is meant to entice and invite attention, which unfortunately includes ill intent. You defend that type of dress so that you can continue to leer along with the rest of us, you lying hypocrite. There's no other reason to defend provocative clothing. If you truly cared about the welfare of women threatened by the attention they dress to incite and invite, you'd encourage modest clothing choices. You don't, because you're a liar and a far worse lecher than Trump, who is at least honest about it (imagine that).
You're a fraud and you're an asshole for daring to suggest a clear explanation for the behavior of men confronted with hot babes is a defense of bad behavior. Typical leftist bullshit posturing.
August 22, 2022 at 11:54 AM
"Not in any way that I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing with my sweet grandmother, no."
So, you're saying there are ways you'd share risque humor with your sweet grandmother? Don't revere her all that much really, do you?
"Not when I was a conservative lad/young man..."
Liar. You were never a conservative, ever. This is evidenced by your false understanding of what conservatism is.
" And not later, amongst my liberal, pagan and Christian feminist friends expect better of me."
Far less compelling given the blatant and overt perversion and moral corruption of leftists of all stripes.
"And just because, why would I?"
What a childish case of expecting accolades for doing something unremarkable: not telling one's grandmother dirty jokes. Congratulations on your superior restraint. Asshole.
"Look, I TOTALLY get that this is normative for many, many men."
More like every damned one of them. Even your homosexuals do it, except being pervs, they do it towards other males.
" Just like rape and slavery used to be normative for many people."
So now you try to make a parallel between enjoying the view of a hot babe to raping her. Nice. More grace embracing by the fake Christian. Even feeling the lustful desire to have sex with her is a far, far cry from rape, you asshole. Stop trying to pretend you're something you're not: a Christian man who cares about moral behavior.
"(and that's what that leering, ogling is, you know? Part of the rape - "women are for men's visual titillation" ownership patriarchal culture.)"
No. That's bullshit pussy leftist nonsense. The reality that women are God's gift to men isn't the same as supposing they're for ownership by men. Only a leftist asshole would suggest such a thing is common to better men who are too moral to be "progressive".
"And understand: This does NOT mean that we don't acknowledge sexuality in healthy ways."
You don't. If you did, you wouldn't support LGBT lies, abortion or women dressing in a provocative fashion despite the attention it draws to make them uncomfortable.
"That 15 year old (or 12 year old!) who you would say "has an adult body" is not wearing that bikini for YOUR sick titillation and perverse enjoyment."
Let's see your polling data. What father wants to see their daughter dressed in a manner which arouses the prurient interest? I mean, what father who isn't a lefty perv? A good father understands the fallen nature of mankind and encourages his daughters, wives, sisters and female friends to act accordingly. And while those girls and women may not have my attention in mind when they don so little material, they'd be morons to suppose they're not gonna get it from me and every other normal and morally corrupt man.
You don't have the moral high ground here, Dan. You're still in the pit. At this point I don't at all believe you have the capability of being better than that. You're too given over to your sinfulness.
Vinny,
"I suppose if I had Trump on tape before he entered, saying that he knew that it was the girl's locker room and that he was entering in the hopes of seeing young girls with their clothes off, that would be even stronger evidence. However, I have no doubt that you could come up with an innocent explanation even for that."
Well, you see, Vinny...here's just one more area where those like you and Dan go wrong. You're suggesting defending or dismissing bad behavior from Trump. I don't do that and never have. I've clarified it, explained it but never tried to defend or justify it, as you defend and justify the many sins and crimes of your own.
"I've never listened to Howard Stern enough to know whether middle-aged celebs routinely brag about things like their ability to barge in on teenage girls while they are undressed, but I would consider anyone who did so to be a creep."
Good for you, but again, try to tell me you've never...and possibly might still...engaged in ribald discourse with others. In the meantime, again, I don't make excuses or try to minimize the bad behaviors of Trump. I just don't let it mean I'll let the nation suffer because I'm too church lady to vote again for a guy who did so much good for so many Americans and seeks to do so again.
"So he either he's a creep or he's lying because he wants people to believe he's a creep."
It's an indictment of the likes of you and other Trump-haters. Most of those who vote for Trump are well aware of his character flaws and indeed, understand which of them are real or imagined by the likes of you and yours.
This occurred to me later:
"They FEEL the threat and the leers and the insinuations all the time, every day, any time they're in view of men."
There are millions of females who would kill to command the kind of attention which gives pearl-clutching Dan the vapors. Not the criminal attention Dan would falsely attribute to conservatives, but the kind Dan thinks makes hot babes live in constant fear. But Dan doesn't really care about women. He only cares about demonizing better people who opposes his evil.
"There are millions of females who would kill to command the kind of attention..."
Do you ever even listen to yourself?
"The women want it," is the argument of the rapist, creep.
{B}ut again, try to tell me you've never...and possibly might still...engaged in ribald discourse with others.
When I was in grade school, I thought fart jokes were funny, but I outgrew it. It's hard to remember all the topics I made tasteless jokes about in high school, but I'm glad that social media wasn't around to record all the dumb things I said. I think it was probably in college that I put most of that behind me, but that was more than forty years ago and it's hard to be precise.
I don't think I ever bragged about assaulting women.
August 23, 2022 at 8:41 AM
"Do you ever even listen to yourself?"
Hard not to, asshole, given the close proximity of my mouth to my ears. What I hear is truth. What I hear from you are lies and cheap attempts to demonize better people.
""The women want it," is the argument of the rapist, creep."
Nice try, you lying asshole. So nice that you dismiss the sorrow of unattractive women and girls as an invitation to rape and other unwanted behaviors. ALL women wish to be desired by men, to be regarded as desirable. The absence of it has a lot to do with how many females turn to lesbianism and feminism. Many women would welcome the risk inherent in unwanted attention, just to have the attention. And you want to make it about rape. You're such an inveterate scumbag. "Embrace grace"? Another lie you tell, you contemptible fraud.
Vinny,
Like Dan, you seek to elevate yourself with your comments. I speak of what's natural and wildly common among even the best of men, and you two fakes like to pretend you're pure as the driven snow. You might want to make more visits to Dan's blog, where leftist fantasy like that is glorified as reality.
I honestly don't see the "problem" with Marshal's comments about males being attracted to females. I do not understand certain people. But I would say that a number of Trump's statements he made in the past about women are indeed perverse (things I would be too embarrassed to say in public).
It's not so much a question as to the character of Trump's every comment, as much as it is how assholes try to make more of them than is reasonable. What the assholes can't stand is that a guy like him is so good at being president. While his character made his candidacy for GOP nominee in 2016 hard to swallow, his record as president makes focusing on his past comments desperate and hollow, especially given how badly the nation has fared since he was unjustly and unfairly denied a second term. Assholes like Dan would rather spend time whining about the insignificant than to admit cheating him out of a second term has greatly harmed the nation.
I speak of what's natural and wildly common among even the best of men, and you two fakes like to pretend you're pure as the driven snow.
(WOW! I get it now! This entire blog is a false-flag operation. You're not really a conservative Republican. You're actually an Antifa provocateur saying the stupidest things you can think of in order to make Trumpers look bad. Well done! Don't worry. I won't blow your cover. I'll just play along.)
Oh no! You're wrong. It's not wildly common among the best of men to brag about being a lecherous voyeur who assaults women with impunity. Indeed, that's the kind of thing that the worst of men might do.
I am particular fascinated by the notion that a person is making himself out to be as pure as the driven snow simply by asserting that he refrains from bragging about assaulting women and invading their privacy. That seems to be setting the bar for purity pretty darn low. I wouldn't consider such a person to be making himself out to anything more than minimally civilized.
I'm particularly fascinated by the notion lefties will corrupt anything to make their point, will demonize a person they don't know as a liar and then believe outrageous things he says as gospel truth because it serves them to do so, rather than simply considering the source. Even the Billy Bush situation used to "prove" Trump is all the lefties say he is doesn't demonstrate what he said is what he actually does. And to accept crude joking about what might have been a mistaken entry into a girls' dressing area is just an opportunity for lefties to again "prove" their hateful and self-serving portrayals of a man they don't know.
So let's keep this to what it is...your desire to smear Trump by whatever means available...and not this constant misrepresentation of my personal reasoned, logical and factual position on typical male behaviors about which you two fakes pretend you're above.
This is my last comment. I think. You're wholly given over to a childish hyper-emotional-driven irrationality.
Marshal...
"Trump is all the lefties say he is doesn't demonstrate what he said is what he actually does."
You don't get it. JUST SAYING that sort of perverse attacks on women IS an attack on women and children and humanity. It's not okay to boast and laugh about raping/sexually assaulting women. THAT is deviant. The boast itself.
But you can't see that. Your partisanship has blinded you.
That, and it's blinded you to the likelihood that Trump DOES act on his perverse rapey words, because he is a privileged man-boy who thinks he can take whatever he wants. He is a narcissist and likely a sociopath. There is no signs of any understanding of decency or truth or morality in him. We have no reason to believe that he isn't exactly the sexually assaulting pervert he presents himself as. There just is NO data to give this deviant any benefit of the doubt that he isn't exactly as he presents himself in his own words when people aren't looking and when he can get away with it.
But even if not, the words are too much.
And you appear unable to recognize that.
I am done trying to point that out on this blog full of people committed to believing the best about a clearly amoral, corrupt narcissist, all the while you attack actually decent people who by all signs are living lives of loved poured out for the oppressed and marginalized, women and children.
Just don't leave any children, women or pets you love in the presence of this man. And stop sending this self-proclaimed billionaire any money. You've been duped by a very dumb pervert.
August 24, 2022 at 7:57 PM
"This is my last comment."
Don't make promises you've no intention of keeping.
"I think."
No. You really don't. Or more accurately, you don't do it very well at all.
"You're wholly given over to a childish hyper-emotional-driven irrationality."
HA!! That's hilarious coming from the guy who seeks to make every utterance from the other side some form of evil incarnate in place of rational thought and intelligent argument against something actually substantive. The idle, sophomoric chat of people in private (or thought to be by participants) is not substantive or threatening to anyone. Normal women aren't the least bit concerned over such and shrug it off as men being immature. Liars of the left pretend it's serious shit.
""Trump is all the lefties say he is doesn't demonstrate what he said is what he actually does."
You don't get it. JUST SAYING that sort of perverse attacks on women IS an attack on women and children and humanity."
No. It isn't, except that you need it to be so when it's coming from Trump or any other ideological opponent, because it's easier than arguing against the truly important stuff.
"It's not okay to boast and laugh about raping/sexually assaulting women."
No one is saying it's "OK", but only that it's not the horror you need it to be so that you can avoid dealing with more substantive matters of which you have no intelligent objection...but only that you oppose.
"THAT is deviant. The boast itself."
No. It's not. It's simply childish, unless you can prove that the person making such boasts actually is guilty of of rape or sexual assault. In the meantime, true deviancy is inherent in the LGBT community and their agenda of lies and your SCDE of it.
"But you can't see that. Your partisanship has blinded you."
I see truth. I find none in you, especially in your fake outrage over sophomoric behavior and false concern for the welfare of women and girls.
"That, and it's blinded you to the likelihood that Trump DOES act on his perverse rapey words, because he is a privileged man-boy who thinks he can take whatever he wants."
Your fake Christian bullshit compels you to choose to believe the worst about better people because they don't act in a particular way. Moral people await evidence and proof of wrongdoing before supposing guilt. It's a bedrock principle of our judicial system (or is supposed to be) that one is innocent until proven guilty. It's blatantly unChristian to presume guilt of one not proven guilty.
"He is a narcissist and likely a sociopath."
You're not qualified to say so, and no citation of any professional who hasn't actually examined him is qualified to say so, either.
"There is no signs of any understanding of decency or truth or morality in him."
Says the pervert who SCDE abortion and LGBT propaganda.
"We have no reason to believe that he isn't exactly the sexually assaulting pervert he presents himself as."
Without evidence, you had no reason to believe he is, especially since you regard him as an inveterate liar who's word can't be trusted...unless you want to use his words against him because of your own corruption.
"There just is NO data to give this deviant any benefit of the doubt that he isn't exactly as he presents himself in his own words when people aren't looking and when he can get away with it."
There needn't be any for actual Christians who actually live as if they are Christians. There IS evidence for YOUR being a deviant and it's in your testimony and insistence of your SCDE of LGBT behaviors and desires.
"But even if not, the words are too much."
His words are of far less concern than are yours and those like you. I recognize that truth and reality quite well.
"I am done trying to point that out on this blog full of people committed to believing the best about a clearly amoral, corrupt narcissist, all the while you attack actually decent people who by all signs are living lives of loved poured out for the oppressed and marginalized, women and children."
You mean you're done lying here about people you don't know personally, who's words you don't believe unless it serves your corrupt purpose to do so, while at the same time referring to those who live in blatant contradiction of God's moral law as "actually decent". I don't believe this will be the last time you engage in such behavior, because it's not in you to abide truth.
"Just don't leave any children, women or pets you love in the presence of this man."
I'd feel children are safer in his presence than in yours given the evil you defend as goodness. You intentionally preach perversion.
"And stop sending this self-proclaimed billionaire any money. You've been duped by a very dumb pervert."
I've never sent him a dime. But you've still not explained how he's duped anyone. Nor do you have any way of doing so without more lies. It's how you roll.
I'm not sure what you mean by “a person they don't know.” Are you suggesting that I need to know Trump personally in order to know that he was lying when he claimed that “[o]ne day, it’s like a miracle, [the coronavirus] will disappear,” or when he claimed that “[w]e’re going to produce phenomenal health care and we already have the concept of the plan,” or when he claimed that the crowd at his inauguration was the biggest, or when he claimed that windmill noise causes cancer, or when he claimed that he passed Veteran's Choice?
It wouldn't surprise me at all if Trump was lying about his ability to assault women with impunity. I always take men's boasts about their sexual exploits with a grain of salt. On the other hand, I suspect that Trump was telling the truth about intentionally invading women's privacy. Had he accidentally entered the Miss Teen USA dressing room, the non-creepy thing to do would have been to apologize, turn around, and leave.
"...he claimed that windmill noise causes cancer"
What he claimed is that other people said it. You can tell when you read the quote of him saying “And they say the noise causes cancer.” His opposition to wind farms is hardly based exclusively on this one additional point of concern. However, who are "they"?
https://stopthesethings.com/2015/10/20/irish-wind-farm-study-proves-turbine-noise-causes-disease/
That has to do with noise. Others speak of EMF causing health issues, though there is nothing conclusive with that emanating from windmills. I'd say it's about as concerning as that which is said to be caused by cell phone use. Somehow mentioning the possibility along with more obvious negatives associated with wind mills is a horror to you lefties.
"he claimed that he passed Veteran's Choice"
"In 2017, Trump signed a bill that eliminated the program’s expiration date and twice signed legislation (in August and December) that authorized funding to keep the program afloat.
Trump also has used executive orders to advance veterans-specific policies, including one aimed at increasing accountability at the VA and adding protections for whistleblowers. Another extends mental health coverage to all veterans during the first-year transition back to civilian life."
-factcheck.org
It's clear you lefties aren't all that concerned with truth and honesty when you're so willing to believe every accusation regarding Trump's concern with truth and honesty. Here's a few links fleshing out (no pun intended) the dressing room stories:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/25/viral-image/no-president-trump-didnt-say-about-miss-teen-usa-p/
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/miss-arizona-donald-trump-walk-half-naked-contestants/story?id=42759541
https://nypost.com/2016/10/12/former-teen-beauty-queens-say-trump-barged-into-their-dressing-room/
I'm particularly fascinated with leftist hatred of this guy, who in part invites it to some extent from the worst of us. Note how one women speaks of the high level of security in dressing areas of the Teen pageants, which makes his "barging in" less likely and also how no one suggests anything worse than him being in too close proximity with a few of them, while more said they had no recall of him doing it at all.
Unlike you lefties, I like evidence and proof, especially when the subject of an accusation is a guy who likes to shoot his mouth off. You low class fakes jump at every tale as if there is no possibility it's wrong or made up bullshit. "It's Trump!!! It has to be true!!!" ...unless it's something positive, beneficial, kind or compassionate. Then it's not even mentioned. Shit...he's more honest about his flaws than lefties are!!
Post a Comment