While I will often cite articles from elsewhere to provide context or support for a point or position I present, I don't think I've used one for the text of any post. But what follows is about as accurate and assessment of the Democrat Party and "progressivism" as one could hope to find. I'm especially pleased to have found it at AmericanThinker.com given recent disparaging comments about such sites by one who hasn't better to provide better insights into current events and the culture in general. Soon I hope to do a post on the cruel joke we call the current president of the United States of America. The same tone as what I've had in mind for that post is present in this link. It's a tone which is the result of the reality we suffer today:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/06/the_democrats_vs_morality.html
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
Dem Immorality---A Mere Taste
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
You cite a hateful raving lunatic to "prove" that Democrats/liberals are immoral and the BIG REVEAL - the evidence for this is an "openly lesbian DA" said that "Drag queens make everything better..."??
THAT is your evidence of immorality?
The actual deviant goes on to spread false claims about "grooming" with no support for it because it's a stupidly dangerously, bigoted false claim.
For this person, having drag queens reading to children (I have to wonder if the pervert writing this piece of trash has EVER taken the time to volunteer at schools and libraries to read to children) is "staging degenerate spectacles for children."
HOW? HOW in the name of all that is holy and good is a person reading stories to children "degenerate..."? Are you not able to see how very indecent and perverted and bigoted this stupidly false and unsupported claim?
Look, I GET it that for bigots like you, the mere presence of a man in a dress (except for Uncle Miltie) is "indecent," but your bigoted thinking just doesn't match reality. And normal people without a predilection to your perverse thinking recognizes your perversions for what they are: Empty-headed religious bigotry and hatefulness.
This J. Robert Smith is just as immoral and indecent as you and that you two think in your little bigoted heads that drag queens reading stories to children is somehow indecent or wrong - SIMPLY READING STORIES TO CHILDREN - just goes to show how very far from decency or facts of public morality you two and bigots like you have gotten.
Shame on you. Shame. You should repent of passing on such hateful, deranged (and seriously - look at his pathetic writing - he's just raving nonsensically with NO evidence of anything) and irrational and emotionally over-the-edge words and think it proves anything other than shaming you for all of history.
God have mercy on bigots. THAT is precisely the language and prayer that I hear from drag queens and others who are more decent than you.
Yep. Just go through the 10 Commandments and see how Dems live to oppose them all. And they take them to extremes: Not only will they murder, but they'll murder their own children and shout their pride about it. Adultery is just a warm-up for them, as they'll go full-on LGBTQX to really stick it to God. They steal on the largest scale imaginable, begging "Caesar" to take wealth by force from the populace to benefit them or to "give" in their name. They covet 24x7. They lie as a native tongue. And so on. Yes, we are all sinners, but the American Left turns it into an art form.
June 21, 2022 at 10:08 PM
"You cite a hateful raving lunatic to "prove" that Democrats/liberals are immoral and the BIG REVEAL - the evidence for this is an "openly lesbian DA" said that "Drag queens make everything better..."??
THAT is your evidence of immorality?"
That's so Dan. Attacking the messenger as a "hateful raving lunatic" for speaking truthfully about the moral bankruptcy of Democrats and "progressives". He cited more than one incident to back up his premise. Indeed, his entire piece is merely a taste of Dem decadence, the tip of the iceberg of moral depravity.
"The actual deviant goes on to spread false claims about "grooming" with no support for it because it's a stupidly dangerously, bigoted false claim."
I especially enjoy Deviant Dan, who spends so much time defending deviancy, perversion and depravity referring to someone like J. Robert Smith as an "actual deviant" for speaking on the actual deviancy, perversion and depravity of Dems and "progressives". The left has been grooming kids for decades. It's simply gotten worse and more a matter of party policy than ever before. Indeed, Dan has been groomed so successfully, he believes homosexuals and lesbians can be considered "saintly" despite engaging in that which God calls detestable.
"For this person, having drag queens reading to children (I have to wonder if the pervert writing this piece of trash has EVER taken the time to volunteer at schools and libraries to read to children) is "staging degenerate spectacles for children.""
It's not just Smith who justly regards this perversion as the horror it is. The vast majority of parents...and by "vast majority", I would wager most who vote Democrat...feels exactly as he does. How many have the courage to say in today's cancel culture is a question for another day. Dan goes on to imply that were there no one to volunteer to read to children in schools or libraries, then it would be just fine to recruit degenerates to do it, so dismissive is Dan of our nation's children. But then, if a kid is lucky enough to avoid being murdered by his own mother while still in her womb, he shouldn't bitch about being subjected to perversion in schools and libraries.
"HOW? HOW in the name of all that is holy and good is a person reading stories to children "degenerate..."? Are you not able to see how very indecent and perverted and bigoted this stupidly false and unsupported claim?"
This is special. A rank pervert like Dan daring to speak of what's holy and good; questioning the character of those who put the best interests of our children over the desires of reprobates. Dan is unable to see how very indecent, perverted and abusive it is to subject kids to such depravity. One needn't get physical to molest a child.
"Look, I GET it that for bigots like you, the mere presence of a man in a dress (except for Uncle Miltie) is "indecent," but your bigoted thinking just doesn't match reality."
I personally am not the least bit concerned when a reprobate refers to me as a bigot for defending truth, morality and more importantly here, what's best for children. What's best for them is to protect them from exposure to craven immorality of the type Dan champions, enables and promotes as moral good. And BTW, Uncle Miltie was creepy doing his drag thing, just as are the cretins Dan loves so much.
"And normal people without a predilection to your perverse thinking recognizes your perversions for what they are: Empty-headed religious bigotry and hatefulness."
Dan has long ago lost his ability to recognize Christian decency and morality. His rejection of God is affirmed and he is given over to his corruption. To call Christian decency and morality "bigotry and hatefulness" is rich, but oh so Dan. He not only lost his way long ago, he now no longer wishes to find his way back, so enamored of perversion has he become!
"This J. Robert Smith is just as immoral and indecent as you and that you two think in your little bigoted heads that drag queens reading stories to children is somehow indecent or wrong - SIMPLY READING STORIES TO CHILDREN - just goes to show how very far from decency or facts of public morality you two and bigots like you have gotten."
Here's just how far Dan's warped mind has become. It hasn't even occurred to him that if these sick bastards really cared about reading to kids, they could more easily do so without parading before them as the immoral monsters they are. And it's not like they're reading only traditional children stories. They're often reading stories meant to indoctrinate kids in perversion and depravity of the kind that really, really turns Dan on.
"Shame on you. Shame. You should repent of passing on such hateful, deranged (and seriously - look at his pathetic writing - he's just raving nonsensically with NO evidence of anything) and irrational and emotionally over-the-edge words and think it proves anything other than shaming you for all of history."
Dan dares try to shame us for rejecting his perversity. He believes we should repent of adhering to God's morality in favor of his cravenness. Not gonna happen, Deviant Dan. In the meantime, Dan tries to criticize Smith's writing style, doing what he always does with better people...overstating what possible flaws might exist in order to deflect from the absolute and unassailable truth Smith presents in his essay.
"God have mercy on bigots. THAT is precisely the language and prayer that I hear from drag queens and others who are more decent than you."
Defending and promoting morality is not bigotry. But Christophobes like Dan and those he defends are deep into bigotry against those who refuse to abide their love of immorality.
What we have here, is Dan protesting too much. He sees himself in the truths Smith presents and it pisses him off to be exposed for the reprobate he is. Dan tries to hide behind claims of Christianity, but we know him by his rotted fruit. He is no Christian. He is not a moral person. He is a fraud, a liar, an unrepentant sinner in open rebellion against God and all that's holy. He fools no one, not even himself.
Read closely and try to understand:
There is NOTHING immoral about being a drag Queen. God has never told you that drag queens are immoral. There is nothing immoral about wearing a dress. There's nothing Deviant about it. There's nothing immoral abouthing being loving and happy and fun and flamboyant.
These are all YOUR hangups. Lord have mercy, you're such a dried up lifeless, loveless old hag devoid of appreciation for humor and joy.
God has never said anything like what you're saying. Period. it's your graceless, ham-fisted imagination, not from morality, not from the Bible and not from God.
Open your eyes. Look around you. Find some room in your heart for grace and love and joy and decency.
And as my dear sainted conservative Old mom used to say, if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.
You look at a man in a dress and call him an "immoral monster," just based on that alone.
Never mind that they're simply being fun and reading stories to children as innocent and pure as a grandmother's love. Never mind that they're not harming anyone. Never mind that they are performing a public service.
Never mind that they're doing so KNOWING (from experience) that there are perverts like you who will look at them and attack them... knowing that some would gladly attack them physically, given the chance. While other cowards would merely attack them with their evil, hateful, unsupported words and by lending support to those who'd actually physically harm them by providing justification (after all, if these are "evil monsters" in the presence of children, hoping to "groom" them, then such "monsters" need to be stopped, some perverts will decide).
Never mind that they are loving and kind and helpful and more graceful towards people like you than you would be towards them.
Never mind ALL of that. YOU have appointed yourself the Accuser and decided that these kind, loving, playful, caring, giving adults need to be literally demonized because... why? WHAT "sin" have they committed?
Oh, that's right. You haven't pointed out any harm or sin they're engaged in. It's enough to cast the accusation and to attack and to demonize, with NO evidence or support.
"Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
“Now have come the salvation and the power
and the kingdom of our God,
and the authority of his Messiah.
For the Accuser of our brothers and sisters,
who accuses them before our God day and night,
has been hurled down.
They triumphed over him
by the blood of the Lamb
and by the word of their testimony;
they did not love their lives so much
as to shrink from death."
We see who is on the side of the grace-less Accuser and how is engaged in pure acts of love and kindness.
May your eyes be opened and the chains binding you to that Dragon, the Accuser, be broken and you find freedom, love and grace that you are not willing to extend to others.
June 22, 2022 at 3:03 PM
"Read closely and try to understand:"
I don't need to "try", Danny-girl. You're corruption is obvious.
"There is NOTHING immoral about being a drag Queen."
Yeah. There is. Overwrought depiction of sexuality is the point. They act as tramps looking to get laid. That's the bulk of them. Though I have seen depictions of them simply lip syncing female entertainers they were impersonating. That's different, though. They're female impersonators pretending to be specific female entertainers.
"God has never told you that drag queens are immoral. There is nothing immoral about wearing a dress."
That's funny. I would have thought someone who dares claim to have "seriously and prayerfully studied Scripture" would be well aware of Deut 22:5. Since you must have been talking about someone else with that "seriously and prayerfully" bit, here is for you:
"A woman must not wear men's clothing, nor a man wear women's clothing, for the Lor you God detests anyone who does this."
Maybe you just forgot because He doesn't repeat Himself on this point over and over and thus if He only says something once, "progressives" like you think it doesn't mean anything.
"There's nothing Deviant about it."
Well, that's certainly not true! And never more true as when they purposely strut around in front of small children and encourage them to participant in their vile deviancy.
"There's nothing immoral abouthing being loving and happy and fun and flamboyant."
There's nothing about your understanding of "morality" which has any relation to God's Will, so...
"These are all YOUR hangups."
Yeah, I have a real hangup about things like the Will of God, what's in the best interests of kids, particularly shielding them from perversion and deviancy.
"Lord have mercy, you're such a dried up lifeless, loveless old hag devoid of appreciation for humor and joy."
Uncle Milty was humor. Flip Wilson was humor. Drag Queens are perverts. And just so you know, when reprobates like you choose to call me names, I take it as blessing, as in Luke 6:22. I rejoice and am glad as in Matt 5:10-12.
"God has never said anything like what you're saying. Period. it's your graceless, ham-fisted imagination, not from morality, not from the Bible and not from God."
Except for that Deuteronomy bit. "Detestable" isn't exactly what I said, but it's in the same vein for sure.
"Open your eyes. Look around you. Find some room in your heart for grace and love and joy and decency."
My eyes are never closed, little Danny. They see perfectly, even at my age, how those like you pervert truth for your perverse ends. I'm not obliged by Scripture to have room in my heart for those like you. It bids me to fell sexual immorality such as that which you promote, celebrate, defend and enable. There is no grace, love, or decency in it at all.
"And as my dear sainted conservative Old mom used to say, if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all."
Says the morally bankrupt hypocrite who called me "a dried up lifeless, loveless old hag", "graceless", with a "ham-fisted imagination" (whatever that's supposed to mean), to say nothing of "bigot" and other such pejoratives. But I would say this to you: if you can't say something intelligent, which seems so unlikely, shut the hell up.
It's particularly galling to hear someone so incredibly in rebellion against God invoke His Holy Name, Words or Scripture in order to defend your ungodly cravenness.
June 22, 2022 at 8:19 PM
"You look at a man in a dress and call him an "immoral monster," just based on that alone."
Not at all. A man in a dress is just immoral for dressing like a woman. "Detestable" God calls it. The "monster" part comes in when he intentionally parades himself in such dress before small children to legitimize the practice in their easily malleable minds
"Never mind that they're simply being fun and reading stories to children as innocent and pure as a grandmother's love."
You ARE given over to your corruption, as well as a liar. I'm beginning to get the idea this is something you do in your free time.
"Never mind that they're not harming anyone."
Liar. They're clearly a corrupting influence and as such are child abusers and molesters.
"Never mind that they are performing a public service."
Liar. If they cared about the children, they could read to them wholesome stories which have existed for generations instead of corrupting them with the notion their perversion is moral. They are performing to service their own desire to pervert those children into accepting their deviancy. It clearly worked on you.
"Never mind that they're doing so KNOWING (from experience) that there are perverts like you who will look at them and attack them..."
Typical leftist tactic...pretending it's those who oppose perversion are the perverts. Lying is like a full time job for you now, isn't it?
"...knowing that some would gladly attack them physically, given the chance."
Mostly only the fathers of the kids they are abusing and molesting by their presence parading their perversion. It's the chance they take being perverts in front of little kids. I would be more than willing to donate to any defense fund of a father...or just a concerned citizen...who physically assaulted anyone who dares act in a deviant manner in front of kids. They're the good guys, even if their passionate concern for the innocent kids being so molested carries them away.
"While other cowards would merely attack them with their evil, hateful, unsupported words and by lending support to those who'd actually physically harm them by providing justification (after all, if these are "evil monsters" in the presence of children, hoping to "groom" them, then such "monsters" need to be stopped, some perverts will decide)."
I wouldn't call myself a coward to simply express the truth about these deviants. I don't keep track of when they show up to engage in their child molesting at libraries and schools. It's probably a good thing for both them and me. And yes, these perverts...and those like you...need to be stopped and kept a mile away from small children. You deviants corrupt children. Matthew 18:6
"Never mind that they are loving and kind and helpful and more graceful towards people like you than you would be towards them."
A "nice" pervert is still a pervert. Leading little ones to sin in a "loving, helpful and graceful" manner is still leading little ones to sin. Stop doing that, Dan.
"YOU have appointed yourself the Accuser and decided that these kind, loving, playful, caring, giving adults need to be literally demonized because... why? WHAT "sin" have they committed?"
I'm pretty certain I covered that comprehensively above. Re-read the truth and be edified.
"Oh, that's right. You haven't pointed out any harm or sin they're engaged in. It's enough to cast the accusation and to attack and to demonize, with NO evidence or support."
I'm pretty certain I covered that comprehensively above. Re-read the truth and be edified.
I chose not to re-post your offering from Revelations, given how repugnant it is when you so willingly pervert Scripture to defend perversion. Of all the perversions you defend, this is one which would be easy for these particular pervs to reject in favor of God's Will. Simply don't dress like women anymore! Thus, they care so little for the Will of God that even something this simple to overcome is not something they care to do. They are not the "brothers" referenced in Revelations or are you. I certainly can't see how you could be called a child of God when you clearly don't love Him enough to reject all of your many heresies and reprobate beliefs. The rebellion is strong in you and you love it.
"We see who is on the side of the grace-less Accuser..."
That is clearly you as you attack me for standing up for God's Will and Moral teaching. You need to re-read Rev 12:10-12 because you are that accuser.
"May your eyes be opened and the chains binding you to that Dragon, the Accuser, be broken and you find freedom, love and grace that you are not willing to extend to others."
You're basically imploring me to side with those to whom you've bound yourself, again like a typical "progressive", projecting onto me the craven sin in which you indulge and promote. I follow God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. May I be more tightly bound to Him than I already am. May you one day consider Him above the world. It may be too late for you, so given over to your corruption you are!
Don't abuse Scripture defending your kind. Use is accurately and appropriately. Find that which you think contradicts the passages and verses I've supplied to prove my point and destroy yours. You don't have a chance of succeeding. You can only misapply verses as you always do. Sad.
Marshal exposed his ignorance by saying...
"Overwrought depiction of sexuality is the point. They act as tramps looking to get laid. That's the bulk of them."
You have NEVER attended a Drag Queen Storytime, am I right?
You LITERALLY are ignorant of what happens at them and have NO data on which to base such a vulgar and perverse opinion, correct?
Tell us then, WHY would any rational people listen to deviants like you who are literally ignorant of the topic and think it is acceptable for perverts like you to pervert the truth in attempt to attack and demonize?
You have a sick, perverted notion of human sexuality, in general and of drag queens specifically. Stop being a bad person speaking from ignorance and bigotry.
And I'm not calling you names. I'm accurately assessing your unhealthy, bigoted opinions for what they are. Calling you bigoted is no more name-calling than calling a dog a mammal.
re: ONE verse in Deuteronomy 22 means nothing. It literally means not a damned thing. That same chapter says that if a virgin is raped, the rapist must be fined and marry the rape victim.
This is a case of rules RIPPED out of context that would be a great evil atrocity if we embraced them today.
"If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,
he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."
Presumably even a pervert like YOU would recognize how very evil it would be to take this as a literal moral rule for all times and places, when clearly it would be a great and horrible evil, not a morally or justly sound "rule."
Don't talk to me about one rule ripped from context from an ancient set of rules as "proof" that God opposes Drag Queens. Hell, even you don't consider cross-dressing evil, insofar as you find Milton Berle and others humorous. You're just using this one verse ripped from context to further malign and oppress a group of people who've historically been oppressed. You want to know God's opinion? God is on the side of the oppressed, not the oppressor.
Stop using the Bible as a cherry picking source for oppression. You only demonstrate your great ignorance of God and the Bible.
Marshal...
"The "monster" part comes in when he intentionally parades himself in such dress before small children to legitimize the practice in their easily malleable minds"
How often have you called Milton Berle a monster? How is what he did (for low-grade humorous affect) different what these people do for the love of children and to take a stand with the oppressed? You DO know that this is the reason for it, if you ask them? It has NOTHING to do with "grooming" and such stupidly, diabolically false claims are from the father of lies and his hateful gang of accusers.
Marshal...
"need to be stopped and kept a mile away from small children. "
Fortunately, YOU don't get to make that decision. Get the hell out of people's bedrooms, pants and business. Stay away from libraries. Those who threaten violence have no business being around children.
Actual Pervert.
June 23, 2022 at 7:45 AM
"Marshal exposed his ignorance by saying...
"Overwrought depiction of sexuality is the point. They act as tramps looking to get laid. That's the bulk of them.""
Then Dan demonstrated his moral perversion by asking...
"You have NEVER attended a Drag Queen Storytime, am I right?"
My attendance or lack thereof is irrelevant. I've seen enough pics and vids of these cretins to validate my position. Yet I don't even need to have seen either for my position to be that which is more attuned to what's in the best interest of the children so perversely exposed to deviants like these. The lives of those kids are in no way improved by having been exposed to these creeps, and many of them likely will be negatively impacted to one degree or another...from cringe-worthy dreams to their own gravitation toward perversity, the latter a great likelihood given the low quality of parenting which put them in the presence of these pervs.
"You LITERALLY are ignorant of what happens at them and have NO data on which to base such a vulgar and perverse opinion, correct?"
Only their own testimony, you sick f**k. To pretend this one perv is an outlier and not representative of every cretin who dares expose children to their twisted crap is just more evidence of what a liar you are.
"Tell us then, WHY would any rational people listen to deviants like you who are literally ignorant of the topic and think it is acceptable for perverts like you to pervert the truth in attempt to attack and demonize?"
You ask this as if a sick f**k like you is representative of "rational people". Call me what names you like because I dare speak the truth about your perversion, Dan. I consider the source and so do actual rational people.
"You have a sick, perverted notion of human sexuality, in general and of drag queens specifically."
Mine is a logical, science and Christian based understanding of human sexuality and depravity...the latter of which you celebrate and falsely promote as moral. Stop being a twisted f**k and speaking from your love of depravity and perversion.
"And I'm not calling you names. I'm accurately assessing your unhealthy, bigoted opinions for what they are. Calling you bigoted is no more name-calling than calling a dog a mammal."
No. You're lying about me. What's more, you've once again exposed your double-standard nature. I refer to Stormy Daniels as a whore and a slut because doing so is no more than an accurate description of a woman who traded sex for money and has affairs with married men. My opinions are not only healthy, they're Christian with Biblical support. You're a lying heretic who anti-Christian and in rebellion against God and nature.
June 23, 2022 at 7:59 AM
"re: ONE verse in Deuteronomy 22 means nothing. It literally means not a damned thing. That same chapter says that if a virgin is raped, the rapist must be fined and marry the rape victim."
And just as I predicted, the liar who lies about being a Christian rejects a clear and unequivocal command of God because God only said it once. And no, I will not re-litigate your perversion of God's commands dealing with virgins.
"This is a case of rules RIPPED out of context that would be a great evil atrocity if we embraced them today."
God's Will is always an atrocity to unbelievers like yourself. Between the two of us, it is you who consistently "RIPS" verses and passages out of context, as well as completely and intentionally perverting the message they teach in order to validate your moral corruption...because you're clearly and unmistakably a twisted f**k.
"Presumably even a pervert like YOU would recognize how very evil it would be to take this as a literal moral rule for all times and places, when clearly it would be a great and horrible evil, not a morally or justly sound "rule.""
Off topic.
"Don't talk to me about one rule ripped from context from an ancient set of rules as "proof" that God opposes Drag Queens."
Of course you don't want me to talk about the one rule which totally and completely destroys your fervent wish that this form of perversity is not prohibited by God as "detestable", even though He said it and there exists no way to pretend God changed His mind on it. No perversion by you of other passages surrounding this verse changes a thing. It was and still is immoral, most particularly given how you do it when you're doing your drag queen performances and story hours.
"Hell, even you don't consider cross-dressing evil, insofar as you find Milton Berle and others humorous."
Hell, I most certainly do, but simply pointed out a clear difference between how Berle and Wilson did it, compared to the cretins who turn you on. For the record, I never saw a Berle bit, but only pictures of him dressed up, and a very brief snippet with someone narrating over it. I've seen Flip Wilson portray his Geraldine Jones character many times and he also was not doing what the deviants you defend are doing. But I was not particularly fond of the notion of either of them dressing as women. It's creepy. Your attempt to compare these two to the reprobates you defend is typical Dan bullshit...dishonest and morally perverse.
"You're just using this one verse ripped from context to further malign and oppress a group of people who've historically been oppressed."
No. I produced it to counter your lying-assed claim cross-dressing isn't a sin.
You want to know God's opinion? God is on the side of the oppressed, not the oppressor."
I know God's opinion. It's clearly revealed in Scripture. He's on the side of those who do His Will and not on the side of those who lie about what it is, like you do.
"Stop using the Bible as a cherry picking source for oppression. You only demonstrate your great ignorance of God and the Bible."
Says the reprobate who perverts God's Word as if he's paid to do it. I don't "cherry-pick" nor do I cite Scripture to "oppress". That's just another lie you tell as you seek to defend perversion and immorality. You only demonstrate your great hatred of God's Truth by daring to accuse me of ignorance every time I prove you wrong.
June 23, 2022 at 8:48 AM
"How often have you called Milton Berle a monster?"
I've no need to do so. He wasn't trying to groom kids toward accepting perversion when he dressed up to entertain adults. I'm not sure he ever sought to entertain kids as his purpose for getting into the entertainment world.
Your pervs aren't taking a stand for "the oppressed". They're fighting to legitimize perversion and deviancy, just as you do. I've provided evidence of the desire of these bastards to groom children toward their immorality. There are other examples I could produce if I thought you'd be honest in admitting how wrong you are on that aspect of their intentions. But you're a liar devoted to all the most immoral aspects of the world you worship above the One True God. You reject the accurate and factual charge of grooming because you're a groomer of children yourself.
June 23, 2022 at 11:18 AM
""need to be stopped and kept a mile away from small children. "
Fortunately, YOU don't get to make that decision."
Not at all fortunate for the small children you corrupt with your perversions.
"Get the hell out of people's bedrooms, pants and business. Stay away from libraries."
The welfare of children IS my business. Prohibiting twisted f**ks like you from indoctrinating them into a life of perversion, deviancy and all the suffering and misery it's brought to everyone who already lives that life is sound policy and true concern for what in the best interest of our nation's youth.
"Those who threaten violence have no business being around children."
Those who expose children to sexual immorality and perversion invite violent responses from those concerned for the welfare of children. Were cops willing to respond with violence did so in Uvalde, most of those dead kids would be alive. You're a horror of a reprobate.
You're an "Actual Pervert."
https://youtu.be/KGxp64MeQ6A
Post a Comment