So the debate centers around the question of what we can do to protect our kids from getting shot in schools. Of course, the reality is that we really want to prevent mass shootings of anybody regardless of where they take place, but most of what follows can be considered with schools in mind. It is my opinion that most of what can and likely should be implemented to achieve this goal does indeed include "common sense" solutions without resorting to any kind or level of "gun control"..."common sense" or otherwise. That's because not only is it unnecessary to enact more laws and regulations on the manufacture, sales and possession of firearms, but rather because guns aren't the problem. They never were.
So what is the problem? Bad people, either criminal or insane, getting their hands on weapons of one kind or another and using them to murder. The situation at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida (henceforth referred to as "Parkland") points to the first point of emphasis: adults doing their jobs.
Due to the largest arrest numbers of juvenile offenders in the state, Broward County, FL. School Board implemented their "PROMISE" program (Preventing Recidivism through Opportunities, Mentoring, Interventions, Supports & Education). This well-intentioned program sought to reduce the possibility of young people being burdened with a criminal record for what was often misdemeanors. The crime rate for teens did drop, and they report 70% of those in the program did not go on to commit other crimes (I would say "not yet" is the best that they can honestly say). But two major problems exist simply by a quick review: 1. Arrest numbers have to drop if fewer kids committing crimes aren't having their crime reported or recorded, and 2. The Parkland case is the second where the failures of this system led to a national news story, the first being the Trayvon Martin case. And as in the Martin case, Nikolas Cruz was a person who should have been arrested, and had that been the case, Martin would likely be still alive and Cruz would not have been able to purchase firearms.
As this story suggests, the program puts the schools over the cops in deciding whether or not an arrest is warranted. This is a problem if a school district is looking to improve their reputation as well as preserve their funding by keeping kids in school...maybe when a kid should instead be incarcerated.
In any case, Cruz stands as an example of the system failing in an epic manner. It is said that many people, from fellow classmates to federal law enforcement, were aware of this kid and no arrests ever took place, even after repeated visits by local police and numerous issues while he was a student at the Parkland school. Adults didn't do their jobs. Indeed, some of his actions constituted felonies which would not have fallen under the plan of the PROMISE program...he should have had a criminal record or some level of psychological record that would have denied him the liberty to purchase a firearm.
So when we really decide to dig deeply, we can see that before we talk about ANY regulations or laws, we must look first to enforcing what exists and doing those jobs as the seriousness of the ramifications dictates.
Naturally, the "adults must do their jobs" step must be a commitment of parents as well. This is much more difficult given how so many people reject traditional notions of right and wrong and also differing notions of what constitutes good parenting in the first place. But at its most basic level, good parenting demands close monitoring and guidance of one's children from their earliest years until they are legal adults. The idea of parents as "best friends" is a dismal failure and while in my case, the relationship between my kids and myself and the missus has been as friends to a great extent, there was always a distinct line drawn about who lays down the laws and who follows them. I've been blessed with great kids who, now as adults (with the youngest about to complete her senior year of college) though less than perfect as the best of us are, continue to make me both proud and humble with their fine, upright character. How typical is our case is another story.
But for some, the best efforts fail and the kids go bad, and can go bad early. It is then that other adults, teachers, counselors, law enforcement, must do their jobs as if lives depend upon them doing so...since we've seen that lives do indeed depend upon them.
So this is the first step of the solution, but only a first step. It is one that must be addressed before any other step is taken because without adults doing their job, no law, regulation, program or government theft of personal property (guns) or infringements upon liberties (possessing the weapons of one's choice) will make a difference. Where the criminal or insane have the will, there's a way. They'll find it.
Stayed tuned.
UPDATE!!
It occurred to me that I didn't mention a thing about what to do should adults continue to fail to do their jobs and future mass shootings occur as a result. Well, for those in positions of authority, such as law enforcement, at the very least, job loss is reasonable. In some cases, perhaps even charges of negligent homicide might be appropriate. There must be some threat hanging over the heads of those in whom we've put our trust...something that compels greater care in making sure the jobs are done properly given the possible tragic consequences of NOT reporting bad behaviors, or NOT transferring records of bad behaviors to others that might have need of them. I'll be thinking more about this as this series progresses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
What a radical idea, enforcing existing laws. Especially those requirements for states and the military to report information to the background check system.
I’d venture to say that virtually all of the shootings that get so much publicity were precede by at least one act that was already illegal or that would have prevented the shooter from legally purchasing a firearm.
But, just one more round of new laws will solve the problem.
Mandatory clear luggage and backpacks for everyone equals common sense gun control. Except the “children” who demand more government action don’t like this action.
The United States Postal Service processing center where I work requires their employees to use clear purses, handags and backpacks when entering the facility.
And, y’all haven’t protested this gross violation of your constitutional rights yet?
Well, as a contractor, my duties don't require that I bring any such bags in the building, so I don't much care. I believe the actual postal employees didn't like it, but even their unions didn't fight it as far as I know. Of course, it's not a Constitutional issue anyhow.
Really, if you listen to the David Hogg’s of the world you’d think it was a constitutional crisis.
Well, he knows, because after all, he's 17.
Yes, we’re supposed to trust the wisdom of a generation that eats Tide pods, snorts condoms, and thinks backpacks are a 1st Amendment issue.
You’ve already given more detail than Feo.
And I'm not done yet.
I know, but Feo is.
Gun bans don’t reduce murder rate (just look at London!)
https://hotair.com/archives/2013/08/28/harvard-gun-study-concludes-gun-bans-dont-reduce-the-murder-rate/
Does gun control reduce murder?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/03/gun-control-reduce-murder-lets-run-numbers-across-world/
Sorry, Glenn, but feo's not allowed to post comments unless they comply with the terms set forth for him in my comment of March 26, 2018 at 4:44 PM from the previous blog post. He knows which one it is. I'll just be deleting every and all comments from him until he complies with those terms to my complete satisfaction. I don't expect that he ever will because he's of such low character.
Snope is run by far-left liberals, meaning it is not trustworthy for anything regarding social issues.
I'm not debating with you Feo. YOU are WRONG about the FACT that an increase in legal firearms has reduced major crime. The increase of CCW permits has dramatically reduced crime. Those stats have been proven over and over and over again.
Your problem is that you believe all the LEFTIST anti-gun lies. But you're a LEFTIST, and so you never have an original thought. Just follow everything Soros tells you.
Enjoy your blue pill life.
Feo,
The only one around here who is anti-science is you and your LEFTIST ilk.
And nothing I posted is lies. You posted Snopes lies.
And I'm not a Republican.
Feo,
You are such a troll.
I am 100% pro bonafide science, not faux science like evolution, man-caused climate change, and all the fake studies by the LEFT.
You can't just tell someone they are Republican, you jackass. I am not a Republican, and not a member of the party.
Snopes is well-known as a bastion of LEFTIST ideology and promoting LEFTIST so-called research. They are not trustworthy for facts or truth, which is why you like them so much.
Post a Comment