tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post7652261875323300141..comments2024-03-29T04:17:43.875-05:00Comments on Marshal Art's: How Threatening Did He Have To Be?Marshal Arthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-24090397292791785642008-04-18T18:24:00.000-05:002008-04-18T18:24:00.000-05:00On the contrary. I believe it is the Bush-bashers...On the contrary. I believe it is the Bush-bashers who don't understand the word. This guy was not contained if he was supporting terrorism inside and outside Iraq. He was not contained if he was embezzling funds from the "Oil for Food" program. He was not contained if Iraqis went missing due to Sadam and his sons kidnapping, torturing, raping their own people. Heck, you can't even say some of our own domestic criminals incarcerated for years are totally contained if they are directing operations on the street from their cells. Hussein had his whole country in which to move about directing his minions in furtherance of his agenda. <BR/><BR/>In any case, Dan, regarding the sentence of mine you have highlighted, it speaks of those like yourself.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-36417719210136692802008-04-18T08:26:00.000-05:002008-04-18T08:26:00.000-05:00It is inconceivable that anyone would look at Sada...<I>It is inconceivable that anyone would look at Sadam as having been "contained" to an extent that would make our actions unwarranted.</I><BR/><BR/>I don't think that word means what you think it means...Dan Trabuehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14303597141397042669noreply@blogger.com