tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post7543064653685551003..comments2024-03-28T19:11:42.225-05:00Comments on Marshal Art's: Bubba/Dan-I'LL Answer The QuestionMarshal Arthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comBlogger495125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-14780970811161668142014-07-22T17:37:00.748-05:002014-07-22T17:37:00.748-05:00You're quite right about that. You're no ...You're quite right about that. You're no one.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-51528808597010638962014-07-22T13:15:28.182-05:002014-07-22T13:15:28.182-05:00I'm not the with a blog writing to no one.I'm not the with a blog writing to no one.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-20590782711338075942014-07-22T08:01:54.206-05:002014-07-22T08:01:54.206-05:00It's incredible how insecure you are.It's incredible how insecure you are. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-16043182229564806732014-07-21T21:05:19.431-05:002014-07-21T21:05:19.431-05:00"And considering I'm not responding to a ..."And considering I'm not responding to a feo who doesn't present complex commentary, but only bad examples of insults, how much time do you think I need."<br /><br />Maybe you spend lunch editing what you write during breakfast. And then post it.<br /><br />What do you eat for lunch? Chips and melted velveta?Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-70667930041440202652014-07-21T08:48:42.045-05:002014-07-21T08:48:42.045-05:00Maybe a hunter and pecker like yourself needs hour...Maybe a hunter and pecker like yourself needs hours to type a few hundred words. At thirty per hour, 300 doesn't take long. I believe I type faster than that. It isn't hard. Maybe it's even trickier for those like yourself who can't see the keyboard with your head so far up your ass. And considering I'm not responding to a feo who doesn't present complex commentary, but only bad examples of insults, how much time do you think I need. <br /><br />The thing is, for you, I could be doing absolutely nothing and still not want to take the time. You consistently show you're not worth it. It's what you do best.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-7669761434708320412014-07-20T23:37:51.851-05:002014-07-20T23:37:51.851-05:00"on a daily basis whilst eating breakfast or ..."on a daily basis whilst eating breakfast or just before I turn in. How often I can spend great amounts of time is another thing altogether."<br /><br />And then you go on for 3, 4 hundred more words?<br />Damn that's a big breakfast!<br /><br />"whilst" is pretty archaic. Maybe you write all this nonsense after "turning in."Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-91324017034977484752014-07-18T19:49:39.833-05:002014-07-18T19:49:39.833-05:001) I shudder to think what you might be "tea...1) I shudder to think what you might be "teaching" and to whom. The younger the person, the more likely they'll grow up to perpetuate the kind of crap people like you have foisted upon the good people of this nation. Please don't tell me you teach Christianity, because you've demonstrated an incredible lack of understanding about what it means to be Christian. That's because you're a fraud and a false priest.<br /><br />2) I never said I don't "show up" for any number of blogs (just a handful) on a daily basis whilst eating breakfast or just before I turn in. How often I can spend great amounts of time is another thing altogether.<br /><br />That I address Dan at any more than his or my own blog only means that we both frequent some of the same. So what? How is that stalking, especially since I only see your sorry ass showing up hear to pretend you have anything intelligent to say (you no longer disappoint, as I now expect nothing intelligent whatsoever from the likes of you, as this last comment of yours demonstrates)><br /><br />3) Only an asshole would think he's making points by suggesting that my comments mean anything less than "mankind". How foolish of me to forget with whom I am dealing. I'm dealing with a fake Christian who will take every opportunity to find fault with another in order to posture his own sorry self as worthy of the respect to which he pridefully feels entitled, but does nothing to warrant. <br /><br />You again make assumptions invented to assuage your own inferiority. You have no idea to what extent I contribute to the needs of my fellow man. None whatsoever. And certainly, you have no evidence at all to suggest that "the right to vote" is an issue with me, that I in any way do anything to infringe upon the right of anyone to do so. Therefore, I reject none of these policies at all. <br /><br />As the deceitful and fraudulent false priest you are, you suggest that history is not rife with one peoples taking from another land or power. When you support reparations from the blacks who sold other blacks into slavery, then you will demonstrate some honesty and consistency in your faux concern for the black people, as if they need YOUR freakin' help. <br /><br />There is no political structure that currently divests property or capital from those of other races. Thus, there are none to support. YOU, however, are doing exactly that by insisting that the people of today donate their own property and capital to those who have not had anything taken from them by the people of today because YOU feel guilt over what people of generations ago did to people of that time. Feel free to donate all that your imaginary rich black wife has received through no effort of her own (since you don't think the black race is capable). She likely won't miss it given how little you regard you have for the intelligence and ability of the black race. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-10113818167550457042014-07-18T12:13:17.434-05:002014-07-18T12:13:17.434-05:001) I do teach, however, which is like blogging. 1...1) I do teach, however, which is like blogging. 130 people every year. Who will grow up to keep us on the right side of morality - and so history. Glad to be the complete opposite of your example. <br /><br />2) You keep saying you have little time. And yet it sounds like you show up at four, five, six blogs, and about three of which you report addressing Dan. That's using up a lot of your time - according to your own words. And THAT'S stalking.<br /><br />3) To be a brother to men [and women, whom you forgot to mention] would be to help with food, shelter, and opportunity - and the right to vote. These are policies you reject for your brothers [and sisters whom you forgot].<br /><br />And theres nothing more deceitful and ignorant than turning a blind eye to the historic divestment of property and capital from the black, native, and brown communities and continuing to support structures that carried this out run political hate and evil.<br /><br />You win those prizes. Deceitful and willfully ignorant. That's you hands down.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-30167737803101593382014-07-12T14:20:56.005-05:002014-07-12T14:20:56.005-05:00By the way, speaking of stalkers, look in the frea...By the way, speaking of stalkers, look in the freaking mirror. Always projecting, aren't you?Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-8986530262418354432014-07-12T14:19:23.192-05:002014-07-12T14:19:23.192-05:001. You couldn't have one without anyone carin...1. You couldn't have one without anyone caring to read it. So good for you for being smart enough to know your aren't smart enough to attract readers.<br /><br />2. You have no idea about my personal life and how busy I might be. Your insecurity dictates that you assume the worst about one who betters your every attempt to belittle. But note my comment of June 2, where I inform Dan, who you need to believe I stalk, that it might take time to respond to him. Then follow the comment stream until my next comment ten days later, you idiot. Even to your unique idiocy, I don't always respond immediately. But even with that, I demonstrate far more insight, thought, logic and understanding of the issues than any of your self-pleasuring comments ever have. <br /><br />3. Coates makes abundantly clear that <i>in his opinion</i> "white guilt" is the racist defensiveness. It is a concept put forth by a black man to describe and explain people like yourself, but it does indeed speak to your own latent racism. Coates does nothing regarding any healing of the racial wounds of this country. People like him, and yourself, pick at the scabs to keep the blood flowing for the purpose of self-promotion and power. Self-respecting, honorable men of character, regardless of their race, don't waste their time with such nonsense and merely get on with living as brothers among men. There's nothing anti-American about that. But there most certainly is when anyone seeks to force attention upon one race over another, especially in the guise of "healing". That's far worse than ignorance. It's willful deceit and self-interest. All because you read the wrong people and can't think beyond leftist masturbatory drivel.<br /><br />Gotta go. Always too busy for you, even when I'm wasting time doing nothing, as if that happens much. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-74541560165055687012014-07-12T09:29:39.540-05:002014-07-12T09:29:39.540-05:001. Don't have a blog.
2. You're not that ...1. Don't have a blog.<br /><br />2. You're not that busy. You stalk Dan at two sites and participate in a 484 comment thread here.<br /><br />3. As Ta-Nehisis Coates makes abundantly clear, "white guilt" is the racist defensiveness. It's about fully healing the nation of some wrongs that keep us from truly attaining stability, security, and progress as a nation. <br /><br />Thus, you're arguing for an anti-American stance. From ignorance and denial. All because you don't read and can't think very well.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-69047027931756764332014-07-11T02:25:33.786-05:002014-07-11T02:25:33.786-05:00So, like your irrelevant link to a picture of Jesu...So, like your irrelevant link to a picture of Jesus and symbols of America, and your worthless comments stemming from it, you again take liberties you don't possess to dictate topics, as if it should be my problem that you cannot generate interest in your own blog. <br /><br />And you also seem to think that I am obliged in any way to you as regards past topics, such as Sotomayor's idiocy. As it happens, life has distracted, and at this point I have no interest. It's a long slog through her pile of crap you regard as brilliance and I may yet take it up again. But feel free to point out the salient points of "brilliance" you're so sure lies within her dissent. I'm betting you haven't the capability of doing so.<br /><br />Until then, you've yet to put before me anything that any normal, rational and reasonable person could call "best". But I too hope for the Holy Spirit's power over your wickedness. He has thus far chosen to give you over to it.<br /><br />As to your "offerings", such as they are, I can respond without wasting my time reading them, though I likely will at some point: <br /><br />1) There <i>is</i> no case for reparations that isn't just another racist attempt by lazy people to force producers to redistribute their wealth. Real men of character make their own way. But you wouldn't know about real men of character.<br /><br />2) What need is there to "revisit" racism when there are baiters like you so willing to keep it alive?<br /><br />It's pathetic enough that you wallow in white guilt without continually demanding that others do as well. Give your own money to those who use any excuse for their own failures and leave the rest of us alone to do with our money as we see fit. There are far more worthy causes than the covetous unjustifiably seeking reparations from those who did nothing to themMarshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-61677322101776724992014-07-09T09:39:29.705-05:002014-07-09T09:39:29.705-05:00I know you won't be able to deal with these, m...I know you won't be able to deal with these, much less be able to read them - like Justice Sotomayor's brilliant dissent, which you were sure to post about. But in a continuing project to put the best before you, I'll hope in the Holy Spirit's power over wickedness.<br /><br />1) http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/the-case-for-reparations/361631/<br /><br />2)<br />http://www.americamagazine.org/issue/revisiting-racismFeodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-48433080072623518382014-07-08T16:06:25.901-05:002014-07-08T16:06:25.901-05:00"And I mean, really. For you, Marshall."...<i>"And I mean, really. For you, Marshall."</i><br /><br />Then that makes you superfluous as well. In the meantime, I'm not about to waste time with another futile expectation that you'll explain yourself. You're just an asshole in your own life. You are you're real problem.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-89433045664626220262014-07-08T14:44:53.807-05:002014-07-08T14:44:53.807-05:00"Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those ..."Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless. What will you do on the day of reckoning, when disaster comes from afar? To whom will you run for help? Where will you leave your riches?"<br /><br />Now there's a real asshole for you.<br /><br />And I mean, really. For you, Marshall.<br /><br />I'm just the shadow of an asshole in your life. He's your real problem.<br />_____________________<br /><br />Cooked salmon with a honey mustard glaze last night. My rich black wife loves that - one of her favorites.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-56452138162749783612014-07-08T08:49:12.707-05:002014-07-08T08:49:12.707-05:00"I live into the role."
Yeah. You'...<i>"I live into the role."</i><br /><br />Yeah. You've tried to run that crap before. What makes you think it will play better now? It is childish in its deception. As is well known, from your very first visit here, you've been a pompous, pretentious, condescending and arrogant asshole, trying feverishly to impress us with what for you passes as intellectual sophistication. In other words, you've always been and continue to be an asshole. It's not because of us, because anyone who isn't an asshole would know that we do not trash talk anyone who doesn't first expose himself, as you have, to be undesirable in some way. And even then, it is usually long after we've reserved our contempt for the ideas and opinions expressed. But YOU, you had immediately exposed yourself as an asshole and it wasn't as if you tried to hide it. <br /><br />As for your dining and travel, you once again offer what can only be a "hey look at me---see how cool I am" reference to Brazil, as if anyone would be impressed. This makes you not only an asshole, but a boorish asshole as well. You bore me, and you're boorish. <br /><br />And what kind of "Christian" believes there is justification for an attitude of acting like an asshole because one believes he is amongst assholes. It's bad enough you have the audacity to presume you <i>are</i> amongst them from your first visit...hardly a Christian attitude at all. But I can't recall what passage of Scripture leads you to believe that is Christian behavior. Even if, like Paul, you feel you must become like others in order to bring them to Christ, when will we see that sort of "bringing" from the likes of you? It won't happen because you are indeed a false priest. You are a fraud. You have no redeeming qualities that you've ever felt compelled to display. Thus, my use of the term "asshole" in reference to you has never been an epithet, but the most accurate word to describe one of your character. Your behavior here over the years can compel no better term. That's on you. Own it and it will be a first step to repentance. Until then, I don't much care what you think or do. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-80381546570069028142014-07-08T08:37:48.555-05:002014-07-08T08:37:48.555-05:00"I see. So it's entirely irrelevant to an...<i>"I see. So it's entirely irrelevant to any point about what Jesus' name was to his family and friends."</i><br /><br />You were the one who said there is no "J" sound in the Hebrew language. I found what contradicts it and now you're trying to say that you were only speaking of ancient tongues of which you also said we can't for sure since we have no one from that period? <br /><br />Yet if the modern language acknowledges the sound, what is to say that the ancients did not, either? Just because they didn't have an "official" letter for the sound, doesn't mean they were without their own slang, or influenced by the many cultures with which they came in contact. <br /><br />Bottom line here is that I never said they called Jesus "Jesus" in the first place, but only that they called Him that in their own language. Glenn never made that comment, either. Try to pay attention.<br /><br /><i>"Let me see if I understand you."</i><br /><br />You don't. You never did and have proven incapable of doing so. Better for you to simply ask for clarification and the use of smaller words.<br /><br />I didn't ask for evidence that one thing made you think of something entirely idiotic and unrelated to the first. I asked you to explain it. It's your small mind. A genius like yourself should be able to handle the chore. Normal people also have thoughts pop up whilst engaged in other things. Normally, because I'm talking about normal people, there is some connection and usually, if not always, the jump is to something similar. <br /><br />In other words, if I look at something that suggests solid and honorable character, I don't think of you. Even after your initial irrelevant and pointless comment, I could not see how the picture would provoke in even such as yourself, thoughts of Nazis, much less thoughts of a theology that doesn't exist. <br /><br />For normal people, any compulsion to think of Nazis generally leads to thoughts of other assholes. So for me to view a picture of Nazis, thinking of you makes some sense, whereas thinking of Glenn or Bubba or Mark or Neil or any of my like-minded bloggers doesn't at all. There is no similarity. <br /><br />So since you don't have the balls to explain your unnecessary initial comment, I'll do it for you: You're an asshole. Only an asshole would make such a disparate connection in his asshole mind. What's more, the mere posting of that initial comment is another validation of my assessment of your character, because one would have to be an asshole to even post it, as if anyone here would care or find it compelling or profound or anything of more value than the provocative crap it was meant to be. <br /><br />So no, idiot. I do NOT think any fleeting thought of my own is an argument. That's quite an asshole leap of logic. I simply hoped some explanation would be forthcoming for why one thing could possibly in your feeble mind lead to another. I hope in vain for too much from the likes of you, and you never disappoint. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-54220372280220938202014-07-08T01:14:33.456-05:002014-07-08T01:14:33.456-05:00"This is not ancient language to which I refe..."This is not ancient language to which I referred..."<br /><br />I see. So it's entirely irrelevant to any point about what Jesus' name was to his family and friends.<br /><br />You just wanted to throw something in there because... who knows.<br />____________<br /><br />"you continue to avoid and dodge your responsibility (not to mention any sense of honor) in supporting anything you say..."<br /><br />Except for the fact that you just inferentially - though forced to do so - agreed with me that no one called him Jesus because there was no J used then.<br /><br />Thank you.<br />_________________<br /><br />"I refer once again to your initial comment on this thread regarding how a picture provokes in you thoughts of a Nazi theocracy that never existed, and how THAT provokes thoughts of people like me. Provide some evidence for that..."<br /><br />Let me see if I understand you. You want evidence of the fact that may seeing a bizarre pictorial of Jesus healing the liberty bell made me think of Nazi theology (theocracy is your word, not mine). Surely the only evidence is that I wrote it down: "hey, I was just thinking that..."<br /><br />And you want evidence than upon thinning of Nazi theology, I then thought of you guys. Rigth? Surely the only evidence that these thoughts associated themselves in such a sequence is... that I wrote it down: "hey, that thought led to another of..."<br /><br />Exactly what kind of evidence do you want, Marshall?<br /><br />OH!!!! I see!!!!! You're under the impression that just any fleeing thought that you have is an argument, don't you? That's why you're asking for evidence for my thoughts! <br /><br />You don't have an idea of the vast difference between making a rational argument and the whizzing disconnected things that role into and out of your brain, do you Marshall?<br /><br />Wow. What a revelation of how stupid you are.<br />________________<br /><br />As for being an asshole, I've travelled through a good number of countries in my life. I've enjoyed reliving Brasilian cities I've been in via the World Cup. And when I'm in a different country, I really try to live into that kind of life. It's all part of educated the vast capacity for soul that we have.<br /><br />So, too, when I come here. To the land of assholes. I live into the role. Otherwise, no real understanding - and pity - would be possible with you guys.<br />______________<br /><br />Unbeatable ribs this weekend. My black father-in-law makes, hands down, the best ribs on the planet. So much so, there's no where I can eat in Texas or the south that compares. He's ruined me for restaurant barbecue.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-43660457527704341782014-07-03T00:44:49.672-05:002014-07-03T00:44:49.672-05:00Thank you so much for lending credence to my concl...Thank you so much for lending credence to my conclusion. Your first response to analysis of you as an asshole is to be an asshole. I guess you just can't help being what you are.<br /><br />I am not angry at the world, just angry at corrupt people like yourself pretending to be what you are not, supporting immorality and demonizing good people. But that's what assholes do and it is not unnatural or immoral to be angry with assholes. <br /><br />Like all other accusations from you, you couldn't possibly on your best day show how I compare with Dan White. But your every comment posted exposes you as an asshole. Well done. You're superior in your consistency.<br /><br />The third letter Gimmel with an apostrophe is used for the "J" sound. This is not ancient language to which I referred, nor did I even hint at such. In the meantime, while you demand support for things I say, you continue to avoid and dodge your responsibility (not to mention any sense of honor) in supporting anything you say. I refer once again to your initial comment on this thread regarding how a picture provokes in you thoughts of a Nazi theocracy that never existed, and how THAT provokes thoughts of people like me. Provide some evidence for that lest you fear mitigating your reputation as an asshole.<br /><br />See, asshole, when one asks "how can one be called Jesus when an alphabet has no 'J'", the logical question is why not having a letter would preclude the ability to make a sound. Nothing dense about that at all. A highly educated and well read intellectual surely has the means to make himself clear, does he not? But an asshole wouldn't take the time when trying to posture himself as superior. However, you simply look like an asshole, especially when presuming the point being missed is a result of the reader and not the failings of the writer. Just like a pompous asshole would presume.<br /><br />I never said I couldn't cook. I said you were a pretentious asshole. <br /><br />Feel free to continue being an asshole in your next comment, while I pray you'll someday repent and be the Christian you laughingly claim to be. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-83540960807128372002014-07-02T11:08:31.592-05:002014-07-02T11:08:31.592-05:00If you're eating chain food and drinking soda,...If you're eating chain food and drinking soda, no wonder you're angry at the world. But you can always use Dan White's defense. You're a lot like Dan White.<br />___________________<br /><br />"And apparently, there is a character in Hebrew that denotes a "J" sound, though not commonly used. As to the ancients, you first say we can't know and now pretend you do. Which is it?"<br /><br />Curious why you wouldn't go ahead and mention this seldom used ancient Hebrew letter. Pray tell us, Marshall, which is it?<br /><br />And as I said before, numnuts, we know their consonants. So..... no J, dipshit.<br /><br />We don't know with precision what the vowels were in their words. So..... we don't know how they sounded them out exactly. We only know variants, dickwad.<br /><br />Try to follow along. I know it's difficult for you.<br />___________________<br /><br />"But if your "point was that a Jew speaking Greek in Roman occupied Palestine would never utter a J when talking", you should have said so. Instead, as you are a pretentious and unjustified condescending asshole, we saw you say<br /><br />'How can the NT call him Jesus...'"<br /><br />See, Marshall, when someone talks about "calling" someone something, they are referring to speech.<br /><br />In this case, "a Jew speaking Greek."<br /><br />You can only miss this point by being a dense turd.<br />_________________<br /><br />Made tacos last night with Penzey's spices. A liquid rojo sauce added to the cooking meat. And a cabernet. Keeps one sane and civilized. The jealousy is on you. Who obviously can't cook.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-50562600389263996172014-07-02T09:57:14.153-05:002014-07-02T09:57:14.153-05:00I had two Egg McMuffins and a can of Dr. Pepper. ...I had two Egg McMuffins and a can of Dr. Pepper. Exquisite! Nobody cares about your dining and travel destinations, particularly because you lord it over as if we're to be impressed by it, rather than as a normal person, joyously reporting your good fortune. That's because you're an asshole. Never, since your first visit, have you displayed anything akin to what even a good false priest would publicly manifest to convince others he was indeed a Christian. Instead, you prefer to be an asshole, and all the time. <br /><br />This isn't anything more than statement of fact. <br /><br />And apparently, there is a character in Hebrew that denotes a "J" sound, though not commonly used. As to the ancients, you first say we can't know and now pretend you do. Which is it?<br /><br />But if your "point was that a Jew speaking Greek in Roman occupied Palestine would never utter a J when talking", you should have said so. Instead, as you are a pretentious and unjustified condescending asshole, we saw you say<br /><br /><i>"How can the NT call him Jesus, Gai, when there is no "J" in koine Greek?"</i><br /><br />...as if they couldn't say "J" because they didn't have a "J" in Greek. What's more, no one put forth that argument in the first place. It was only that His name in Jesus, regardless of how a given people pronounce it, or what version of the name their language has. But no. YOU have to try and pretend you're knowledgeable, more sophisticated in your understanding. You're not. You're nothing but an asshole. <br /><br />So, do you think you can ever visit here and discuss something like a human being who is interested in serious and honorable debate? Or are you only interested in being an asshole? Just state it one way or the other so I know. If you want to continue acting like an asshole every time you visit, making accusations you never support, pretending anyone is impressed by your obscure references, or wowed by where you eat, I'm not interested. You bore me. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-66020725458810517592014-06-30T21:37:50.350-05:002014-06-30T21:37:50.350-05:00Tonight I cooked, having a week and a day off. Bra...Tonight I cooked, having a week and a day off. Braised short ribs, cabbage, cornbread, and more Provencal rose. Perfection.<br /><br />To anyone but a rat's ass, my point was that a Jew speaking Greek in Roman occupied Palestine would never utter a J when talking. Nor to say someone's name. <br /><br />Your point that the possibility exists in the universe that an ancient Jew could was agreed to by me if that Jew was on the toilet and screaming something incomprehensible to his family and friends because of severe constipation.<br /><br />Which is exactly what you are.<br /><br />DENSE constipation.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-41537165945525148512014-06-30T17:33:30.467-05:002014-06-30T17:33:30.467-05:00feo,
Despite your delusions of grandeur, you don&...feo,<br /><br />Despite your delusions of grandeur, you don't have the mental capacity to differentiate between true wisdom in comments and...well...your comments. So, just like the failure of all like yourself who can't understand good from evil, you think all that opposes your "intellectualism" is "rat's ass". <br /><br />And your failure is evident in your inability to understand a simple explanation. YOUR statement implied that the lack of a "J" equivalent in ancient Hebrew prevents them from making a "J" sound. Don't pretend there is something wrong with my comprehension skills when you can't get a point across. <br /><br />What's more, I did indeed state a position on the English name of Jesus. That position is, "His name is 'Jesus'", and it doesn't matter the various versions of other peoples. It only does to the false priest with an inferiority complex as he again fails in an attempt to appear superior in knowledge. <br /><br />As to your newest pretentious boasting regarding dining, you the definition of lipstick on a pig. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-50661423335197474652014-06-30T09:22:04.786-05:002014-06-30T09:22:04.786-05:00I find that just about all you give us is a rat...I find that just about all you give us is a rat's ass.<br /><br />Like me, you've yet to state a position on the English name of Jesus.<br /><br />Except you did say that ancient Jews could have made the J sound. And I'm sure you're right. We all make sounds that aren't native to our language. But it's only when doing things that aren't really speech. Like sneezing. Or retching. Or giving birth. Or sex. Are you saying, Marshall, that the name Jesus is some kind of Tantric meditation?<br /><br />And this time, try a response that's better than your typical rat's ass. Raise your character!<br /><br />Ate a French place last night. A.O.C. Bistro. Roased Chicken with cauliflower gratin. The best.Feodorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02216659885831979653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-67893180875703951212014-06-28T22:57:30.938-05:002014-06-28T22:57:30.938-05:00"You guys get the nastiest when the precipice...<i>"You guys get the nastiest when the precipice of admitting that you've lost yet another argument on the merits of reason..."</i><br /><br />Again, you argue that which is not in evidence. This is especially true given the laughable suggestion that you've brought reason into any discussion in which you've ever entered here.<br /><br /><i>"I would not have reported, Marshall, my Friday night appointments if Glenn had not presumed that I avoided addressing his anachronistic analogy."</i><br /><br />Yet you had time in two comments immediately after his analogy to make two pointless and failed attempts to prove you have something akin to a bull's eye response. No. You saw a chance to pretend anyone would care about what restaurant you patronize. Normal people would have simply responded in kind or not responded at all or even simply said, "I ran out of time" or "I forgot about that analogy---here's my response now." <br /><br />And don't think I give a rat's ass about typos as a general rule. But we're talking about the false priest who prides himself on being superior (as if he is). You want to posture yourself as "all that", but make the same spelling mistake twice. How can that be? How can you live with it?<br /><br />Now, after 24 typically lame comments from you, you have yet to justify your first. That's a lot of dancing around just to avoid explaining the implication that anything connected to Nazis should in any way provoke thoughts of us. Apparently you're content to slander without reason. Typical. Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.com