tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post4287417882347552834..comments2024-03-28T19:11:42.225-05:00Comments on Marshal Art's: Poor GirlMarshal Arthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-44755776460470094582011-11-03T01:39:00.268-05:002011-11-03T01:39:00.268-05:00"...you seem to have an excuse for everything...<i>"...you seem to have an excuse for everything you do."</i><br /><br />You confuse "excuse" with "explanation". Two distinctly different words. I offer no "excuses" for what I do, that is, offer no justifications for wrongdoing, especially to clinical idiots who wouldn't understand anyway. I will, as the case might demand, offer an explanation, as I do here, so as to be better understood, though I hold no such hope for you.<br /><br /><i>"Right now, you seem incapable of dealing with a DWTS contestant in an appropriate manner."</i><br /><br />Not right now, or ever, will I expect an explanation for this absurd accusation. There was absolutely nothing inappropriate with anything I've said regarding the post, which has to do with a person lying to themselves, to others and the enablers who will join in the lie. The point is a simple one, though a simp like you is incapable of understanding: This is a female pretending to be a man and hoping the world will join in the pretense.<br /><br /><i>"As for Mark, I think he doesn’t mind dropping the n-word. This could be the genesis of why I started calling him a racist."</i><br /><br />Two blatant lies here: 1st, that Mark "doesn't mind" dropping the "n-word". You couldn't know that even if he typed the words, "I don't mind dropping the 'n-word'". And you've never established anything that would prove he is in the least bit a racist. EVER. The second lie is that you pretend to use this to justify calling him a racist. There is no justification and you call him that because you're an asshole with no legitimate way to denigrate a person with whom you disagree.<br /><br /><i>"Going forward, when you make an inappropriate comment, I will be happy to point it out to you."</i><br /><br />Going forward, you won't be able to accuse anyone of making an inappropriate comment if you don't also provide a detailed explanation of what exactly makes it inappropriate.<br /><br /><i>"Just for fun, I did take a trip back in time. And it took you inside of a month to suggest that somebody you disagreed with was an idiot."</i><br /><br />And obviously, just to prove my point, and the fact that you're an incredible asshole (it may have been you I was talking about), you have once again accused without proof, no link, no nothing. To that I say, "typical".<br /><br />And thus ends Parkie the troll-boy's presence at Marshall Art's. I hope no one has suffered too much nausea.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-79104241068546904642011-11-03T01:24:29.281-05:002011-11-03T01:24:29.281-05:00"I fully expect you to delete everything I po...<i>"I fully expect you to delete everything I post."</i><br /><br />You should knowing that's the consequence of intentionally posting bad attempts at cleverness, substance-free drivel and baseless accusations.<br /><br /><i>"And just as you continue to delete, I will continue to comment."</i><br /><br />But you don't <i>really</i> comment, do you troll-boy? No. You post what I've described above, otherwise known as "worthless crap".<br /><br />I said:<br /><br />"Then it should be easy enough to provide evidence..."<br /><br />To which you responded:<br /><br /><i>"I have many many times."</i><br /><br />The trouble here is, are you the freakin' liar this suggests, or are you the clinical idiot such as I've commonly classified you and you simply don't know what "evidence" means. In the context of a blog discussion, it is to substantiate a claim, to explain why you believe the claim is accurate. Thus, to say "you said XYZ and that's homophobic" is insufficient. It's plain that you wish to believe that is so, but you make no effort whatsoever to explain just what makes the statement homophobic. In other words, it isn't homophobic merely because you say it is. Thus, no evidence has been presented. Only the claim of a fool has been presented. <br /><br />Furthermore, taking words out of context, such as, "We hate" without the words that follow, and then pointing to it as evidence that I am hateful is abject dishonesty (which means you're a freaking liar). It is not evidence that I am (or we are) hateful. Instead, it's a lazy, if not desperate, attempt to posture yourself as correct, when you're worlds away from it.<br /><br />So you've never explained how my position on the sinfulness and psychologically abnormal nature of active homosexual behavior is equal to any kind of phobia or hatred for the sad souls who pretend to believe there is nothing wrong with acting on their urges.<br /><br /><i>"But you have a nasty habit of calling people derogatory names."</i><br /><br />I call YOU derogatory names, because you insist upon it. So does feodor. Are you alluding to my use of a legitimate contraction of a word used accurately? "Homo" is not derogatory because activists and enablers say it is. This is merely a tactic employed to stifle legitimate debate. I'm not bound by such whining.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-87668070597471623732011-11-02T13:47:30.979-05:002011-11-02T13:47:30.979-05:00"comment deletion will resume"
Ma.. do ..."comment deletion will resume"<br /><br />Ma.. do whatever you want. I fully expect you to delete everything I post. And just as you continue to delete, I will continue to comment. Such is life.<br /><br />"Then it should be easy enough to provide evidence..."<br /><br />I have many many times. Honestly Im tired of posting about how you are homophobic. But you have a nasty habit of calling people derogatory names. Sure, you seem to have an excuse. But, you seem to have an excuse for everything you do. Right now, you seem incapable of dealing with a DWTS contestant in an appropriate manner. As for Mark, I think he doesn’t mind dropping the n-word. This could be the genesis of why I started calling him a racist. Going forward, when you make an inappropriate comment, I will be happy to point it out to you. Just for fun, I did take a trip back in time. And it took you inside of a month to suggest that somebody you disagreed with was an idiot. To that I say cheers.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-13835776778019967542011-11-02T13:02:38.877-05:002011-11-02T13:02:38.877-05:00Then it should be easy enough to provide evidence ...Then it should be easy enough to provide evidence to support the charge. Good luck with that. While you're at it, perhaps you could provide evidence that Mark is a racist. Or that I am. That's another baseless charge you like to throw about. Another is "homophobe". So rather than "LOL" one more time like a freakin' lunatic, perhaps you can prove an accusation rather than simply throw them out there. Until then, comment deletion will resume.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-12179115851211002902011-11-02T12:43:51.452-05:002011-11-02T12:43:51.452-05:00"nothing to support the charge of hate."..."nothing to support the charge of hate."<br /><br />This is a joke..Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-89717318976792668882011-11-02T12:35:26.455-05:002011-11-02T12:35:26.455-05:00And still, like usual, nothing to support the char...And still, like usual, nothing to support the charge of hate. Of course, troll, I'm sure you'll point to comments directed solely at you. But again, your own level of commentary is designed to provoke such responses, indeed, begging for them. Your job, but you're too dishonest to take it, is to provide evidence of hate toward anyone. But you know that's a fool's errand (which, ironically, would seem ideal for you) because you damned well know there can be no success. The fact is clear: I don't hate anyone and have never given any reason for anyone with the least shred of honesty and integrity to believe it is true. I don't even hate you, despite your every attempt to provoke. You're too pathetic to hate, for one thing, and for another, anyone worth hating does not deserve the effort required to expend that degree of emotion. <br /><br />No. There's no hatred here, except that brought by people like yourself. You're just too stupid to recognize it in yourself and way too hateful to know that it doesn't exist in those you hate.<br /><br />I am quite at peace, little troll-boy. That partly explains my continued welcome to you to actually engage in serious discussion despite your abuse of that welcome evident in every comment you post. Face it, small child. Your efforts are wasted here.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-55895963924977536172011-11-02T11:17:23.783-05:002011-11-02T11:17:23.783-05:00Ma.. your comment.. Im embarrassed for you.
The ...Ma.. your comment.. Im embarrassed for you. <br /><br />The amount of hate and vile that you manage to throw up on your own blog, on such a regular basis, is astounding. I sincerely hope that you find some sort of peace in your life. But, of course that is up to you.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-61921035016949852542011-11-01T14:15:22.005-05:002011-11-01T14:15:22.005-05:00Almost a good question, troll-boy, so I'll res...Almost a good question, troll-boy, so I'll respond to it.<br /><br />You are in no position to accuse anyone of treating others poorly, as you have been doing that since your first appearance. This is similar to feodor and why some thought the two of you might be the same person. (Still not certain that isn't true, but who cares?) That I treat shit-heels like you poorly is merely my response to the comments you post which beg for such replies. Thus, treating you poorly is actually doing what you insist upon. Ironic, isn't it? You'll note that I haven't gone through with comment moderation whereby I could delete your comments before they even appear on the blog at all. THAT is because I still entertain the very unlikely fantasy that you'll grow up, put on your big-boy pants and post a mature and thoughtful comment meant to seriously engage in the topic at hand. Instead, however, you prefer to act like a punk and make all manner of false statements about me and my guests, as well as completely stupid comments meant to suggest a cleverness of which you are most sadly devoid. You think you are making fun of me, but you don't seem to realize that the target of such antics is supposed to be the one who looks bad. But as you are so pathetic in your attempts, it is like you are purposely pissing in your own face. And that's so sad that deleting your comments is also a protection against rhetorical self-mutilation. It's obvious that if you must post something, it would be far simpler for you to type out, <i>"Hey everybody! Look at me! I'm a fucking idiot!"</i> for that is the effect your comments have on the reader.<br /><br />What I dislike, you putrid little prick, is your presence as you prefer it to be: a childish and sorry excuse for a human being. As such, I have no problem with the likes of you "calling me on" anything. You are irrelevant and seem to enjoy being so.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-17861836489632485852011-11-01T13:52:54.972-05:002011-11-01T13:52:54.972-05:00Ma.. which do you dislike more... knowing that you...Ma.. which do you dislike more... knowing that you treat people poorly or being called out on it?Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-55271733192962000152011-10-31T15:13:36.241-05:002011-10-31T15:13:36.241-05:00Parklife, you have just told a huge lie about me. ...Parklife, you have just told a huge lie about me. There is nowhere on my blogs where you will ever see me condemn any other culture unless it is for its immorality.<br /><br />And your spin on my kilt is nothing but lies also.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-28554518780009954962011-10-28T19:31:05.510-05:002011-10-28T19:31:05.510-05:00Just for clarification, in case someone just has t...Just for clarification, in case someone just has to chime in, it is indeed a skirt. A kilt is a type of skirt. And, the thought seems to be that it came to Scotland from the Roman soldiers when they were in Britain way back in the 2nd century. Of course Roman soldiers needed something besides the robes/togas, etc to be able to freely move about in combat, and they didn't have trousers back then!Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-5522419624196255592011-10-28T19:21:55.385-05:002011-10-28T19:21:55.385-05:00It's a kilt. If he wore something under it, it...It's a kilt. If he wore something under it, it would be a skirt.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15633208787250567256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-79318334796379142592011-10-28T19:18:25.044-05:002011-10-28T19:18:25.044-05:00Marshall,
I know, but I like to make points whic...Marshall, <br /><br />I know, but I like to make points which demonstrate his inability to think cohesively, intelligently, even in conjunction with his stated worldview. :oD<br /><br />He's the kind I end up banning from my blog because he adds nothing constructive in the way of debate.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-26351532254425284182011-10-28T19:11:46.430-05:002011-10-28T19:11:46.430-05:00Glen,
Don't waste your time with Parkie. You...Glen,<br /><br />Don't waste your time with Parkie. You're dealing with a head of lettuce, a dried pile in a cow pasture, a clinical idiot. He has no intention of actually discussing intelligently or in an adult manner because he isn't capable.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-67923094540874437542011-10-28T19:09:16.335-05:002011-10-28T19:09:16.335-05:00Reconstructing a face or cleft palate is no more a...Reconstructing a face or cleft palate is no more about vanity than fixing a broken arm. And you know better - you are being intentionally stupid.<br /><br />Wearing clothing of heritage - or in the example of me it is also a uniform when playing bagpipes - has nothing to do with immorality, which is the only thing we address in people's personal lives.<br /><br />We are indeed called to judge immoral behavior for what it is; we are called to expose error and proclaim truth. You have no moral standard by which to make any of your proclamations other than just your opinion.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-82948655391768383002011-10-28T18:43:42.969-05:002011-10-28T18:43:42.969-05:00Parklife,
I have no idea who the French lady is, ...Parklife, <br />I have no idea who the French lady is, but as John said, reconstructive surgery is for repairs - not vanity.<br /><br />Ah, so now you are denigrating one’s heritage? Typical bully; makes you feel good doesn’t it!Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-56792680845256550052011-10-28T18:36:25.911-05:002011-10-28T18:36:25.911-05:00Reconstructive surgery essentially fixes something...Reconstructive surgery essentially fixes something which is broken. It attempt to restore a bodily feature to as close to its original form as close to properly functional as possible.<br /><br />Sexual reassignment surgery is not reconstructive. It is not fixing something which is broken. What is (for lack of a better term) broken was her mind. There is something in there that tells Bono to alter a perfectly functioning body. What needs fixing is the part of her mind that has convinced her there is a problem with her body.John Bhttp://truthinreligionandpolitics.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-40598911662228479242011-10-28T15:15:32.380-05:002011-10-28T15:15:32.380-05:00What about that lady who had reconstructive surger...<i>What about that lady who had reconstructive surgery on her face.</i><br /><br />Plastic surgery done solely for vanity purposes is also wrong. But it does not fall into the league of total mutilation and sexual immorality associated with it. Your inability to see the difference just demonstrates the depth of your depravity.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-30936493602993107622011-10-28T14:49:59.775-05:002011-10-28T14:49:59.775-05:00Parklife,
You seem to lack common sense of any s...Parklife, <br /><br />You seem to lack common sense of any sort, and don't seem to be able to comprehend what you read.<br /><br /><i>must be nice to live in your world. Everything is black and white.</i><br />Well, according to God, everything morally is either right or wrong, "black and white." Do you have a better moral standard you follow?<br /><br />I don't understand your reference to wisdom teeth - what has removing them to do with sexual mutilation for fun?<br /><br /><i>Chaz never broke the law, yet you drone on and on..</i><br />Actually she broke God's moral law.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-70944372733779823862011-10-28T13:24:29.556-05:002011-10-28T13:24:29.556-05:00That body builder is a man, period. This is total...That body builder is a man, period. This is totally unfair to the women in this "sport." This is really, really perverted.<br /><br />These people are all self-focused. They don't care about anyone but themselves.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-87230599633721748952011-10-28T13:05:28.357-05:002011-10-28T13:05:28.357-05:00There was this story on the internet today. What&...There was <a href="http://www.aol.com/2011/10/28/transgender-bodybuilder-chris-bruce_n_1063585.html?1319810940&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl6%7Csec1_lnk2%7C108197" rel="nofollow">this story</a> on the internet today. What's worse with this story is the usual crap about "being me" after having drawn a lifelong commitment from a woman and with her, producing two kids, of whom he insists are dealing with it well. Yeah. Sure they are. What a selfish asshole. <br /><br />But now, the jerk wants to compete in bodybuilding competitions against actual women. This isn't the first time we've seen this type of thing, as there was that tennis player from some years back who did the same thing. <br /><br />Just think of how much worse the world would be if everyone was to give in to their urges rather than to transcend them in order to become as close to what God wants us to be as we possibly can. It's difficult to think that the world hasn't had enough of that already. But some here are in favor of justifying anything and demonizing those who see the error of doing so as "judgmental". <br /><br />It's quite clear that He cannot come too soon.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-69445468076262370022011-10-28T12:51:33.189-05:002011-10-28T12:51:33.189-05:00Really, Jim. If you want to make comparisons, the...Really, Jim. If you want to make comparisons, there are better examples in the area of cosmetic surgery rather than what you've tried to pass as in any way equal. But even there, though many would say that much of what Michael Jackson did wanders deeply into serious emotional issues, there is still much that is beneficial, like breast reduction to ease stress on the back, or even improvements on what are really birth defects. <br /><br />But a sex-change is an emotional issue, the result of dysfunction, not a true problem with the physical body. Her problem wasn't that her nose was huge.<br /><br />As if that wasn't enough....Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-23425588279734089402011-10-28T12:27:36.894-05:002011-10-28T12:27:36.894-05:00Jim,
So you compare necessary surgery with mutila...Jim,<br /><br />So you compare necessary surgery with mutilation to change external appearance from male to female? That demonstrates a real problem with YOUR thinking process - no absolute morality, let alone common sense. Typical for liberals.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-14756275215266117212011-10-28T12:16:52.286-05:002011-10-28T12:16:52.286-05:00We can judge that mutilating oneself demonstrates ...<i>We can judge that mutilating oneself demonstrates a person has some real emotional problems</i><br /><br />I was born with an appendix. I had it removed. Was that mutilating myself? I was born with wisdom teeth. I had them taken out. Mutilation?<br /><br />My brother had skin grafts. They took skin from his thighs and put it on the top of his feet after he had been scalded. Mutilation?<br /><br />Mastectomy. Mutilation? Implants. Plastic surgery. Mutilation? Gall bladder removal? Nose job?<br /><br />I may have knee replacements. Mutilation?Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149193.post-28688442641537649652011-10-28T11:52:22.128-05:002011-10-28T11:52:22.128-05:00Hi Glen,
Don't mind the troll. Parklife just...Hi Glen,<br /><br />Don't mind the troll. Parklife just enjoys making baseless accusations because he's a clinical idiot. He's never once engaged in anything akin to a meaningful conversation since he's fouled the site from his initial visit. I generally delete his inane comments as soon as I see them unless one is worthy of special derision and mockery, as the best manner of dealing with him is simply to point and laugh. He's like my personal village idiot. If you see a comment by him before I delete it and you wish to respond to it, copy and paste the section in question so that your response won't seem weird after I delete his comment.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.com